Satanists - both sides of the Diabolic rationalism of Atheist totalitarianism - both are idolaters of mammon

The roots of Freemasonry -

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: Secret sects of Syria and the Lebanon part I

Secret sects of Syria and the Lebanon part I

{In the public domain} Part II here: God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: Secret sects of Syria and the Lebanon part II

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: Communism is Satanism




(Wurmbrand is not recommended, see instead Jews called in Christ)

KARL MARX AND SATAN IS A CORRECT STATEMENT FOR MARX WAS A TOOL OF SATAN WILLINGLY AND COMPLETELY AND THEREFORE DAMNED AS ARE ALSO ALL THE WORKS OF COMMUNISM. The Black Book of Communism is a correct condemnation of Communism. 

The Justice of God: The Black Book of Communism

The Justice of God: The Black Mass is the Abomination of Desolation

KARL MARX AND SATAN.

INFO - www.barruel.com - INFO

---

KARL MARX AND SATAN.

http://www.barruel.com/karl-marx-et-satan.html

You will read a small book whose title is very clear ... written in 1976 by ​​Pastor Richard Wurmbrand.
Small size - 11.5 cm x 18 cm - and a few pages - 95.
But first, a few words.
A priori, Marxism is fashionable, with communism socialism AND : Olympic Games in China in 2008, among the friends of Nicolas Sarkozy, major crimes against humanity ...
For info, I recommend only 1 - a - book, The Black Book of Communism, crime, terror, repression, published in 1997 by Robert Laffont. You "read" by yourself.
But Marxism is sacred, you touch it.
More than 100 - one hundred - million dead past and present, it's nothing, just "subraces".
Republicans good, untouchable, at ease here in France.
"YOU MUST FOLLOW THE MARXIST THEORY ..." declaration of the end of 1999, rhetoric, screaming our dear little ears, made ​​during the 21 Congress of the Socialist International by the Prime Minister at the time, Trotskyist, Mr. Lionel Jospin November 8, 1999 ... ( READ )
"We are openly calling for Marxism, Leninism and the early years of the Russian Revolution of trotzkysme."
Dixit Laguiller, December 3, 2007. (Source material facts-and- No. 247 of 15 December 2007).
Not to mention Olivier Besancenot, the postman Trotskyite Gulag, with its Revolutionary Communist League and other Krivine, who would do better to go ... the gulag.
A believe that nobody has read and Alexander Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago.
, but it is true that the TV control ...
Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and their "brothers" were great admirers of the coup d'état of a sect that was the "revolution" French, and always took an example, consider themselves all as his "children" (read B. and O. Nicolaïevski Maenchen-Helfen, Karl Marx, Gallimard, 1937).
That all politicians are "Republicans" of 1789 children, children of the widow, the sect called Freemasonry, as Nicolas Sarkozy, who has repeatedly said to be a Jacobin Freemason in good it is .
And finally, Marxism is updating a system of violent and tyrannical government already pronated by Adam Weishaupt, grand master of the Masonic sect order illuminati of Bavaria destroy religion, abolish property, destroy family, completed the destruction of all morality, labor conscription, steeply progressive tax (Law French Masonic lodges output) ... preferably by all the violence and crushing his enemies ... (Read Nicolaïevski B. and O. Maenchen-Helfen, Karl Marx, Gallimard, 1937).
Destroy entirely the old order of things, and re-build their way, they know very well done.
Genuine "workers" of the coup violent and bloody of the civil war, that was the French Revolution, they, members of cults: freemasons, enlightened of Bavaria, Rosicrucian, Martinist Theosophists Luciferian or Satanic sects - ditto -.
The same ideologies practiced during the Russian Revolution with Freemasonry, occultism, Martinism, Maitre Philippe, Papus, Rasputin, Madame Blavatsky and Theosophy, among others, who said: "lucifer is divine and terrestrial light, the Holy Spirit, and Satan at the same faith. " (The Secret Doctrine t IV, his family theosophical, Paris 1925, p 83).
Marxism, Freemasonry and sects are inseparable, socialism and Freemasonry complement proudly ...
Just read the book Fred Zeller, former Grand Master of the sect version "great east of France," and former secretary of Levi Braunstein said Trotsky, entitled: three points is all published in 1976 by ​​Editions Robert Laffont.
In Spain today, while it gives the "title" of religion a cult - Scientology - founded by L. Ron Hubbard, notorious Satanist student of Crowley, govern good "Republicans" socialist, communist Marxist buddies to the "belle époque" ...
See below a "great work", among many others, made ​​by those that you present as "good Republicans" ... Marxist Barcelona, ​​July 20, 1936.
sadism, necrophilia, violence, terror, widespread massacres ...
Similar Techniques in Russia during the Marxist revolution, applied by the brothers Lenin and Trotsky.
Marxism and demonic horrors merge.
It is " Republican. "
Not to mention the National Socialism of Hitler, who wanted to found her too "new world order" with Alfred Rosenberg and his worship lucifer, freemasons, "illuminated Bavaria" golden dawn, Theosophy, Rosicrucians, Skull and Bones, Vril, Thule, black magic and ... global banks ... (Read Hitler and the secret societies of René Alleau Hitler and the black order of André Brissaud, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony Sutton).
And finally, the continuity is ensured today by the order "para-Masonic" rituals "tinted" of Satanism, the order of Skull and Bones in the United States, with its "outer circles" that are CFR the Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg, among other sects.
Are all these people, these criminal ideologies, these dark characters cult members, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, Theosophists, Martinist, Skull and Bones, and "enlightened" that grow in this new world order ... to enslave all peoples ... under the reign of their god satan lucifer or - ditto-.
"We will have ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, whether we like it or not.
The only question is whether it will be created by conquest or by consensus. "
Dixit James Paul Warburg, a director of the bank Kuhn, Loeb and Co., Financial "revolution" and its Russian massacres, addressing the U.S. Senate on 17-02-1950.
Jacob Shiff, bank employee "global" Kuhn, Loeb and Co., gave $ 20 million in gold to both Marxist criminals Levi Braunstein said Trotsky and Vladimir Ilich Lenin Ulyanoff said ... better to kill ...
It is worth noting that the "hot dish" Al Gore ... married a descendant of Jacob Schiff.
Gorbachev, in good Marxist, another promoter of the "new world order", with its "green cross international," is a member of the Lucis Trust - ex lucifer trust - ... at the UN.
And you already know that "the United Nations (such as UNESCO) is almost entirely composed of Masons of all countries" ... (Pierre Mariel, The Free Masons in France, Biblio. Marabout - Paris, 1969 - page 204.)
Not to mention the fact that all these people vérouillent publishing, print and television, radio, called national education ... and national thought ...
EVERYTHING.
fact is.
Finally, look at the two images below, the first in 1974 and the other 1980 ...
An "Invitation" box version "Grand Lodge of France", the "HIGH GRADES are imbued with the spirit of ROSE-CROIX, "on behalf of Giscard, the" father "of the" European Masonic design. "
The Rosicrucians are followers of sexual magic - with children - and occultism.
It includes "the Scottish Rite and former accepted MORIN and reformed by PIKE. " ( READ )
Simple reminder, Albert Pike was the "reformer of Luciferian cult - or satanic - of modern times" (Dictionary of the occult), and founder of the Ku Klux Klan. Grandmaster universal Freemasonry in Charleston, author of Morals and Dogma - the "Masonic Bible", he said: "What we must say to the crowd is: We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition.
To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General (33e. ..), we say that you repeat it to the brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees (and not to the brothers of inferior grades ): The Masonic religion should be, for all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine. "
They also model as Eliphas Levi, the great master of the world ... Satanism.

And still the "father" of European design, Giscard, in good Republican, a member of the Trilateral Commission, bowing with great reverence at the grave of one of the greatest criminal in history, that of "brother" Marxist Lenin.

Giscard, Europe, Euro, UN, Lenin, Marxism, socialism, communism, freemasonry, even "ideology" Republican.
It's just the shape that is different, but the "thought" is unique.
Facts you mention, there has "tons" ...
That which governs France and the world ...
The Luciferian or Satanic sects - ditto -: Freemasonry, Rosicrucian, OTO, illuminated, theosophy and other criminals.
You will believe for a second that these "elites" will think of you, your children, the poor?
No!
Misfortune will be generalized.
But back to the book ...
The original Karl Marx and Satan is published by Diane Glendale (USA) under the title: Was Karl Marx a Satanist?

Good read.January 2008.

---

INTRODUCTION Before becoming a renowned economist and communist, Marx was a humanist. Today a third of the planet is Marxist. Indeed, in one form or another, lots of people are Marxists, even in a capitalist country. To Christians, even clergymen - some high ranking - are convinced that, just as Jesus gave the key to how to go to heaven, Marx gave the key on how to help the hungry, the poor, the oppressed of the earth.
Marx was profoundly human. An idea haunted him: How rescuing the exploited masses? Which routes them to impoverishment, he said, is capitalism. According to him, once abolished the rotten system and after a transition period under proletarian dictatorship, the state would wither and paradise for the worker. In communist society everyone would work, each according to his ability, in factories or farms belonging to the community, and everyone is rewarded according to his needs. There would be more the state to govern individuals, more wars, more revolutions, but only a perpetual and universal brotherhood.
However for the masses access to happiness, it takes more than the outright abolition of capitalism. Marx wrote: "The destruction of religion as the illusory happiness of men, is essential for their real happiness. The call to abandon their illusions about their condition is a call to abandon a condition which needs illusions. The criticism of religion is the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo. " (Introduction to the Critique of the Philosophy of Right, Hegel).
Marx was anti-religious because, for him, religion is an obstacle to the realization of the ideal communist he considered the only solution to world problems.
Thus Marxists explain their position. Some men of the Church are based in the same way. Reverend Osterreicher (UK) said in one of his sermons: "Communism - whatever its various current forms of expression - is behind a movement to liberate man from his farm by humans. But the sociological point of view the Church has been and still is to a large extent on the side of "exploiters". Karl Marx, whose theories poorly veiled genuine passion for justice and brotherhood rooted in the prophets of Israel, hated religion because it served as an instrument for maintaining the status quo where children were treated as slaves and worked to death so that others get richer. And it happened right here in Britain. One hundred years ago, when it was said that "religion is the opium of the people", it was not a baseless criticism ... As members of the Mystical Body we must make amends and to recognize that we have a just debt to all famous communist. " (Sermon delivered at St. Mary's, Fontana, London, 1968).
As for me, I am a Christian. I love humanity and I want her well. This is why I would accept without scruple anarchy, communism, democracy or fascism if it would bring happiness to men. For a long time I looked at the work of Marx to understand his mind. I discovered during this study a number of surprising things that i would like to share with my readers.
Marxism impact is mainly because of its success, but the substance of the success they prove something? The witch healers also. The success confirms the error as well as truth and also the failures we are of inestimable value: it opens the way to a deeper truth. We will also analyze some works of Marx regardless of success or they did not.

1THE HUNTING OF GOD. In his early youth, Karl Marx was a Christian. The first of his written works - at least those that have survived - the Union is entitled faithful to Christ. There is this beautiful word: "For the love that we love Christ, we focus at the same time our hearts to our brothers who are closely linked and for which He gave Himself in sacrifice" (Marx and Engels, collected works, Vol. 1, International Publishers, NY 1974).
Marx thus knew a way for men to become brothers to one another: it is Christianity.
He continues: "Union with Christ is able to obtain exaltation inner comfort in pain, quiet confidence and a heart capable of loving all that is humanly noble and great, not by desire or ambition glory, but for Christ's sake. "
At about the same time he wrote his thesis Reflections of a young man on choosing a career: "The religion itself teaches us that the ideal towards which all their efforts tend sacrificed Himself even for humanity. Who would dare oppose him a denial? If so we chose a situation where we can do for him the maximum, we can never be crushed by the burden, since it will not be anything other than sacrifices for the sake of all. "
It is conversion or apostasy can transform her man one hundred percent. Often, later, his former beliefs or disbeliefs back to the field of consciousness, thus proving that they were not completely erased from his mind but only repressed in the subconscious. The former complex is implicit in Christian writings of Marx long after he became an activist against religion.
Even in this dense book, devoted to political economy, what Capital, a book in which reflections on religion are completely displaced, Marx, cold opponent of religion, writing, completely out of him: " Christianity with its cult of abstract man, especially in its bourgeois forms as Protestantism, Deism, etc.., is the form of the most perfect religion "(Chapter I, Section IV).
Do not forget that Marx was primarily a devout Christian. On leaving the school, the certificate holder under "Religious Instruction" this assessment: "His knowledge of the faith and Christian morality is lucid and well founded. He also has a degree in History of the Church "(Archives for the History of Socialism and the Workers' Movement, 1925, in German).
Shortly after obtaining this certificate it happens in his life something mysterious. Indeed, long before Moses Hess brings in 1841 with socialist convictions, he had already become deeply and passionately antireligious.
During his graduate years, another Marx had arisen. Himself wrote in a poem: "I want to avenge Him who reigns above us." He is convinced that "someone up there reigns" and he has a grievance against him. Yet this has not anyone done any harm. Marx belongs to a family relatively easy. He has not experienced hunger in his childhood, and he is more fortunate than many of his classmates.What has been aroused in him implacable hatred against God? His personal reasons escape us. Should we conclude that Marx in this statement is simply the spokesperson of another?
At an age when normal young man feeds the beautiful dream of doing good to his neighbor and to prepare for his career, why he wrote the following verses in his poem "Invocation of a desperate"

"So I ripped a god" My Everything "
in curses and blows of fate.
All his worlds have vanished
without hope of return,
and it only remains for me now than revenge. "
"I want to build a throne on high,
its summit is icy and gigantic
bulwark It will terror of superstition,
to marshal the darkest pain. "
"Whoever bears to the throne a healthy look,
divert the pale and silent as death,
Fell into the clutches of death indiscriminate and shivering.
happiness May dig his grave! "
(Karl Marx, Selected Works, Vol. I - New York, International Publishers, 1974) The words "I want to build a throne" and the confession of Him who sits on can come and anguished terror they evoke Lucifer and not the program I will ascend into heaven, above the stars God I will erect my throne (Isaiah 14:13)?
Why Marx is he such a throne? The answer lies in a little-known drama also composed during his years of study, entitled "Oulanem." To explain the title, we must digress.
There is a Church of Satan. One of the rites the black mass is celebrated at midnight by a priest of evil. The candles are placed on the candlesticks upside down. The priest is coated ornaments, lining outside. He says all that is prescribed in the prayer book, but in reverse, starting from the end. The holy names of God, Jesus and Mary are read backwards. A consecrated host stolen from a church receives the inscription "Satan" and serves as a communion ridiculous. During the Black Mass, a Bible is burned by fire. All assistants swear to commit the seven deadly sins listed in the Catholic catechism. The ceremony ends with an orgy.
A deliberately "Oulanem" is the inversion of a sacred name, which is an anagram of Emmanuel, the Biblical name of Jesus in Hebrew means "God is with us." Such names have reversed their effectiveness in black magic.
And now we will not be able to understand the drama of "Oulanem" if we listen first strange confession of Marx in his poem "The Minstrel"

"The hellish vapors come into my brain
and fill it until I went mad
and my heart is completely changed.
Viewing this sword:
The Prince of Darkness has sold me. " In initiation rites upper satanic cult, the candidate receives an enchanted sword which ensure success. He buys at the price of a pact signed in blood taken her wrist, that after his death his soul will belong to Satan. Here is an excerpt of Oulanem:

"It beats and gives the signal.
increasingly boldly I play the dance of death.
Oulanem And they are also, Oulanem.
name sounds like death,
then continues until a turn off miserably.
Stop ! I got him he now stands in my mind
as Clear air as consistent as my own bones. "
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
But I have the power, with my arms,
From you crush and grind you ("you" = humanity personified)
With the force of a hurricane,
While for us both the abyss yawning opens in darkness.
You will sink to the bottom,
I follow you, laughing,
whispering in my ear You "Descend, come with me, my friend!" The Bible that Marx had studied during his high school years and he had not forgotten his maturity says that the devil is chained by an angel and thrown into the abyss (abyssos in Greek Apoc. 20.3) . It is in this abyss reserved for the devil and his angels that Marx wants precipitate humanity.
To whom Marx ready he his voice in this drama? It is not devoid of common sense to expect from a young student to pursue it as his lifelong dream of such a vision of humanity drawn into the abyss of darkness (the darkness external biblical expression equivalent to hell) while himself shaking with laughter bad, follows those that led to unbelief? Not found anywhere in the world looking for that ideal, if it is' in the initiation rites of the Church of Satan, and even in the higher levels.
But when death came to Oulanem. Listen to his last words:

"Lost. Perdu. My hour has come.
's time clock has stopped,
the pygmy house has collapsed.
Soon on my breast I embrace eternity,
Soon I proférerai on humanity
Horrible curses. '
Marx liked the word Mephistopheles in Faust: "In life everything deserves destruction." "Everything", including the proletariat and the comrades. Marx in the 18th Brumaire, quoted these words.Stalin took them to the letter, up to destroy his own family.
The cult of Satan is not materialistic. She believes in eternal life. Oulanem, Marx character who lends his voice, no contest. He says his life, but it is a life of hate thrust climax.
Incidentally, for the devils, is synonymous with eternity of torment. Thus Jesus heard reproach: "Hast thou come hither to torment us before the time?" (Mat 8:29)
Marx continues:

"Ah eternity, our eternal torment,
A death unspeakable and immeasurable,
abject, artificially designed to taunt us,
We, blindly mechanized machinery,
Made to absurd schedules
of Time and Space,
No other object be there
to be destroyed. " We begin to understand a little of what had happened to the young Marx. He had Christian beliefs, but he had not led a life consistent with these principles. His correspondence with his father is evidence of large sums of money wasted in the pleasures and perpetual disputes with the authority of his parents for that reason and others. It was then, presumably, what could take place in the church's indoctrination highly secret and that Satan was initiated rites. Satan speaks through the mouths of his worshipers who see hallucinations during orgiastic. And so it is that Marx is not anything other than his spokesman when he says: "I want to avenge Him who reigns on high."
Listen rather late Oulanem:

"If there is something capable of destroying,
I throw myself headlong,
Exit to lead the world to ruin.
Yeah, this world that creates a barrier between me and the abyss
I fracasserai into a thousand pieces
A strength of curses;I étreindrai in my arms its brutal reality,
he dies in my embrace without a word
and nothing will collapse in a total
Liquidated without existence:
Yes, life is what it really! ' (These quotes are from the book by Robert Payne, The Unknown Karl Marx - Karl Marx unknown - New York University Press, 1971).
In Oulanem Marx exactly like the devil: he delivers to damnation whole human race. This is probably the only drama in the world where all stakeholders are fully aware of their own corruption, they fear not spread elsewhere and they report with conviction. Not black and white. There is here neither Claudius and Ophelia, or Iago and Desdemona, everything is black and reveals the features of Mephistopheles. All characters are fiends, corrupt, damned.
At the time he wrote this, Marx, precocious genius, not twenty years. He has already made the program of his life. Not a word about the service of mankind, the proletariat nor socialism. He wants to lead the world to ruin. He wants to build a throne "which will thrill the bulwark of men."
From that time also date some passages in veiled terms of the correspondence between Karl Marx and his father. The son wrote: "The curtain fell. My Holy of Holies was torn and had to install new gods." These lines are from November 10, 1837 a young man who, hitherto, had made a profession of Christianity. He had previously stated that Christ was in his heart. It is more so now. Who are the "new gods" installed in its place? His father replied, "I failed to insist on an explanation of a very mysterious, although it seems to me very doubtful." What was this mysterious question? None of the biographers of Marx has not yet given the interpretation of these strange words.
Blumeberg Werner in his book Portrait of Marx cites a letter from Marx's father to his son. It is dated March 2, 1837: "Your advancement, the hope of one day seeing your name and your highly reputed well-being in this world are not the only desires of my heart. These are, it is true, long-cherished dreams, however, I can assure you that their achievement would not have made him happy. But if your heart remains pure, he fights with humanity and if no demon succeeds in depriving it of its noblest sentiments, Only then I will be perfectly happy. "What has suddenly pushed the father to express his fear of demonic influence on his young son Christian right so far? Was it the poems he had received it as a birthday present for his fifty-five years?
Another quote that Marx, in his poem On Hegel reveals his own thoughts inspired by Hegel: "I teach in a tangled jumble word diabolical, so everyone can believe in the truth of what he chooses to think."
Elsewhere in the poem The pale virgin, he admits:

"So I lost the sky,
I know very well.
My soul once true to God
Was marked for hell. " This happens a comment.
At the beginning, Marx had ambitions as an artist. But his poems and dramas, without literary value, knew no success, they are nevertheless useful for us to reveal the state of his heart.
The failure in painting and architecture gave us Hitler. The failure in the drama, a Goebbels. The failure in philosophy and painting respectively brought us two war criminals, Rosenberg and Streicher.As for Marx, forced to abandon poetry, it comes in the name of Satan in a revolutionary career against a company that did not appreciate his works. Obviously there is a pattern where - among other things - his absolute revolt. Another cause: he was despised as a Jew.
Two years later the young Marx wrote "The difference between the philosophy of nature in Democritus and Epicurus home" where he makes his own, in the preface, the declaration of Aeschylus: "I fed the hatred of all the gods." This somewhat mitigates this statement by saying that it is against all the gods on earth and in heaven who do not recognize as supreme deity consciousness of man.
Marx was the declared enemy of all gods - who had bought him his sword to Prince of Darkness. He had set a goal to lead all mankind into the abyss of perdition and join them with a grin.
Marx he actually bought his sword Satan?
In a book entitled "The moor and the general. Remembrances about Marx and Engels" (Editions Dietz, Berlin 1964) daughter Eleanor tells us that when they were little, she and her sisters, their father was fond of telling them stories. There was one in particular she loved of all, there was about a certain Hans Röckle. But let him speak: "The narrative lasted for months and months because it was a very long history and no end. Röckle Hans was a wizard ... he had a toy store ... and a lot of debt! ... Notwithstanding his sorcerer, his treasury was always empty, so he was forced to sell to the devil, piece by piece, all the pretty things that belonged to him ... Many of these adventures were terrific and we made your hair stand on end. "
Is it normal that a father speaks to young children and horrible things pertaining to the sale of this demon they more expensive? Robert Payne Marx (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1968) alludes to this with plenty of details like those provided by Eleanor. He insists that Röckle the magician was very unhappy and that he is reluctantly ended up agreeing to sell its toys, until the last moment seeking to retain. But his pact with the devil was signed and there was no way of escape.
The author adds: "These stories were endless, in all probability, an autobiography ... Marx's worldview own Satan, he also had malignancy. Indeed it sometimes seems to be aware of the implementation of Evil. "
When he finished Oulanem and other early writings where he admits he made a covenant with the devil, Marx did not socialism at all. He even fought. He was editor of a German journal, "Rheinische Zeitung", "who does not even give the theoretical value communist ideas in their present form and wish them much less practical realization, finding, in any case, impossible .. . Attempts by masses to promote these communist ideas are welcomed by a cannonade as they become a danger ... "
Reached this stage, Marx met Moses Hess, the man who played the role in life the most important person who made him embrace the socialist idea. But this is not what Hess says about it: "Dr. Marx - my idol - which will kick fatal to religion and politics of the Middle Ages." "Give a kick to religion" is indeed its main purpose. Another friend of Marx at that time, George Jung wrote an even more clearly in 1841: "Marx will surely chase God from his heaven and it itself will stand trial. He argues that the Christian religion is the one of the most immoral "(Conversations with Marx and Engels. Insel publisher, Germany, 1973). Surprising since Marx believed that the early Christians were slain of men and even ate their flesh.
These forecasts were therefore those who initiated Marx into the mysteries of satanism. It is absolutely wrong, so he fed the great social ideal to help humanity and that religion is in his eyes an obstacle to the realization of this ideal, he adopted an attitude that anti-religious . This is just the opposite. Marx hated all gods without exception to the notion of god. He had volunteered to "hunt God kicked." Socialism is for him a bait to attract proletarians and intellectuals ideal diabolical. When the Soviets initially took as its slogan: "Away with the capitalists of the idol - which will kick fatal Ala religion and politics of the Middle Ages." "Give a kick to religion" is therefore its main purpose. Another friend of Marx AThis time, George Jung writes in an even clearer in 1841 "Marx will surely chase God from his heaven and will his own trial. He argues that the Christian religion is one of most immoral "(Conversations with Marx and En gels. Insel publisher, Germany, 1973). Surprising since Marx believed that the early Christians were slain of men and even ate their flesh.
These forecasts were therefore those who initiated Marx into the mysteries of satanism. It is absolutely wrong, so he fed the great social ideal to help humanity and that religion is in his eyes an obstacle to the realization of this ideal, he adopted an attitude that anti-religious . This is just the opposite. Marx hated all gods without exception to the notion of god. He had volunteered to "hunt God kicked." Socialism is for him a bait to attract proletarians and intellectuals ideal diabolical. When the Soviets initially took as its slogan: "Away with the capitalists of the God of heaven and earth," they were simply faithful to the inheritance from Marx.

* I spoke earlier of the inversion process names like black magic. But inversions are so ingrained in the thinking of Marx used it everywhere. Proudhon's book "Philosophy of Poverty" he replies with another he called "Poverty of Philosophy". "We need to use, he said, instead of the weapon of criticism, the criticism of weapons," etc..
The aspect of Marx with his shaggy hair and beard do he ever asked question? Men of his time were generally beard, but not like hers! or as long hair. The appearance is typical of Marx followers of Johanna Southcott, priestess of a cult who claimed to be extravagant relations with the demon Shiloh (Conversations between Marx and Engels). It is curious to note that in 1814, some sixty years after his death, "the group of Chatham Southcottians had in its ranks a soldier, James White, who, after his service in India, returned direct the local group, still spreading the doctrine of Johanna giving him a communist coloring "(James Hastings, Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. York Charles Scribner's Sons, 1921, XI, 756).
Karl metaphysical hardly spoke in public, but we can reconstruct his thought with reference to the men to whom he was associated. Among them Bakunin, a member of the First International, wrote: "Satan is the first free thinker and savior of the world. He frees Adam and prints on his brow the seal of humanity and liberty by disobedience" ( God and the State citations Anarchists, edited by Paul Berman, editor Praeger, NY 1972).
Bakunin not only to the panegyric of Lucifer, it also has a concrete program of revolution - but not to liberate the poor from exploitation. "In this revolution, he writes, we must awaken the devil in people and excite him the most vile passions" (Quoted in Dzerzhinsky R. Gul, "Most" Pub. House, New York, Russian ).
It is precisely with this Bakunin whose program is so strange that Karl Marx created the First International. It is he who tells us that Proudhon, another major socialist thinker and friend at the time of Karl Marx, "loved Satan", too. Proudhon was presented by Hess Marx, he also had the same hair style, typical of the beard of Johanna Southcott satanic cult in the nineteenth century (Conversations with Marx and En gels, Insel Verlag, 1973, Germany).
In his book "On Justice in the Revolution and in the Church," Proudhon declares that God is the prototype of injustice. "We reach the knowledge spite of himself, we obtain the well-being despite himself, we come to the company despite him again. Every step forward is a victory when we win the divine."
It exalts "God is stupidity and cowardice, hypocrisy and duplicity God is, God is tyranny and poverty, God is evil. Wherever humanity bows before an altar, a slave of kings and priests, will be condemned I swear ..., O God, hands to heaven, you are nothing other than the executor of my reason, the scepter of my conscience ... God is essentially anti-civilization, anti- Liberal anti-human. "Proudhon declares that God is evil because man, his creation is bad. But such thoughts are not original: they are usually found in the sermons of worship Satan.
When later he quarreled with Proudhon, Marx wrote a book to refute his "Philosophy of Poverty" where the quotes above. It contradicts its economic doctrine on minor points but he has no objection to his demonic rebellion against God. It should be emphasized strongly that Marx and his followers, even if they were anti-God did not make them atheists argue as though the Communists today. In other words, they proved their hatred for God in whom they believed in openly denouncing and insulting. This is not the life they were questioning, but his supremacy.
During the uprising of the Paris Commune in 1871, Flourens communard said: "Our enemy is God. Hatred of God is the beginning of wisdom "(Philosophy of Communism, Introduction by Charles Boyer, Fordham University Press, NY)
Marx praised highly the Communards who openly proclaimed that goal. But what does this have to do with a fair distribution of goods and better social institutions? This is where a mask to conceal the true purpose: the total annihilation of the faith in God and his worship. The proof is now countries like China (red), Albania and North Korea where all the churches, mosques and temples have been closed.
Marx wrote poems very interesting on this topic. The general opinion they have no literary value, but the thoughts expressed are revealing. In "The prayer of a desperate" and "human pride" the supreme prayer of man is for his own greatness. If man is condemned to die because of his own greatness, it will be the cosmic catastrophe, but he died in a divine being, crying demons. In his ballad "The Minstrel" he celebrates the singer's complaint against a god who neither knows nor respects his art, which emerged from the dark abyss of hell, "bewitches and seduces the mind heart - and his dance is a dance macabre. " The minstrel drew his sword and plunged into the heart of the poet.
"The art emerging from dark abyss of hell bewitching the mind," it evokes the words of the American Revolutionary Jerry Rubin in "Do it": "We have combined youth, music, sex, drugs, revolution with treason is is something very difficult to overcome. '
In another poem he admits that his goal is not to improve the world, not more than reforming or put in a state of revolution, but to simply rush to ruin for enjoyment, Marx declared:

"I will throw my glove dismissively
In the face of the world
and see it collapse pygmy giant
Whose fall will not extinguish my fire.
then as a victorious god I will randomly
among the ruins of the world
And, giving my words power of action,
I feel equal with the Creator. " (The translation of D. McLellan of "Marx before marxism" McMiIlan)
It is not without inner struggle, in fact, he chooses Satan. His poems were completed during a severe illness caused by the storm raging in his heart. He then notes how he feels annoyed having to make an idol of an idea he hates. He falls sick (ibid.).
The main reason for the conversion to communism Marx is clear in a letter to his friend George Jung to Ruge. There is no question of the emancipation of the proletariat or a better social order. Read more: "If Marx, Bruno Bauer and Feuerbach associate to found a political-theological review, God would do well to surround himself with all his angels and indulge in complaining because those three will certainly succeed in the chase the sky ... "(Quoted in McLellan, see above).

2LIBERAL THEOLOGY OF COMMUNISM IN All followers of Satan militants have tormented private lives. This is also the case of Marx. Kunzli Arnold in his book "A psychogram Karl Marx" (Europa Verlag, Zurich, 1966), tells of his life that led to the suicide of his two daughters and a son. Three children died of malnutrition. His daughter Laura, wife of Socialist Lafargue, also lead to the cemetery had three of her children after which she committed suicide with her husband. Another of his daughters, Eleanor and her husband decided to do so, she died but he, at the last minute, renounced his project. Families followers of Satan are cursed. Marx felt no obligation to work to earn bread for his family. He could easily do so, as it was gifted to the study of languages, but he preferred to live off Engels. He had his home an illegitimate child whom he later attributed the authorship to Engels. The latter agreed to play comedy. He drank a lot. David Ryazanov, Institute Director Karl Marx in Moscow, alludes in his book Karl Marx the thinker, the man and wrestler. (International Publishers, NY, 1927).
Because we have a word of Engels, we can add that it was raised in a pious family. In his youth he had even written some beautiful poems Christians. We do not know how he lost his faith, but here are his first impressions after meeting with Marx: "Who among wild chase with ardor? - A dark man of Trier (birthplace of Marx), a remarkable monster. It does not work nor short, he turns on his heels full of rage and anger as if to catch the huge tent of heaven, and cast upon the earth. It beats the air with his arms, stretching high. His fists are clenched, threatening, and it does not stop rage as if ten thousand devils had seized him by the hair "(M. Engels, Selected Works in German, additional Volume II, p. 301).
Engels began to doubt his Christian faith after reading a book by liberal theologian Bruno Bauer. His heart had been the scene of a great battle. He wrote at the time: "I pray every day and even all day long since I started to doubt, but I can not go back yet. Tears come to my eyes as I write "(quoted in Karl Marx Franz Mehring, G. Allen & Unwin, London, 1936). In fact Engels did not find the way back to the word of God and began to follow that he called "the monster possessed by thousands of devils." It was the experience of a cons-conversion.
What was this stuff Bruno Bauer, liberal theologian who played a decisive role in the destruction of the Christian faith and Engels also managed to give confidence to Marx to move forward in its new path to anti- Christianity? He case, too, the demons? Listen to what he says himself in one of his letters to Arnold Ruge, a mutual friend of all three, December 6, 1841:
"I'm trying to give a series of lectures here at the University, and there is a crowd. I do not recognize myself when I utter profanities at the top of my chair! They are so strong that these young people - that should shock no one yet - have the hair stand on end. While I decide, I can not help thinking how piety at home, I made an apology of Scripture and revelation. In any case, this is a very evil demon who seizes me whenever I ascended the pulpit, and I am so weak that I can not help but give him ... My mind will not let me blasphemy truce if I get permission to preach openly as an atheist professor System "(Marx-Engels; Historic critic Complete Edition - Archiv Verlags-gesellschaft, Frankfurt a. Main, 1927 vol I, 1).
The man who convinced him to become communist Engels was the one who had convinced Marx before. Hess recounts following his meeting with Engels in Cologne: "He left me a communist militant super. That's how I exercise havoc! "(Moses Hess, chosen Oeuvres, ed. Melzer Joseph, Cologne 1962). "I practice havoc" (Moses Hess, OEuvres chosen, ed. Melzer Joseph, Cologne 1962). "I practice havoc" was this then the supreme goal of life Hess? This is certainly one of Lucifer.

* The traces of Christian he was not taken away never mind Engels. In 1865, he expressed his admiration for the anthem of the Reformation: It is a mighty fortress is our God. He says it is a hymn of triumph, a kind of sixteenth century Marseillaise "(Introduction to Dialectics of Nature). Could find about other similar pro-Christian character Engels.
His tragedy is overwhelming and still more poignant than that of Marx. Listen to this beautiful poem of youth, Christian inspiration, made by the same people who would later become the right arm of Marx's destructive struggle against religion:

1. "Jesus Christ, Lord, only-begotten Son of God,
come down from Deign Thy throne of heaven
to come and save my soul.
Descend with all thy blessings,
Thou Light of Holiness of the Father!
Allow me choose You.
Oh she is kind, beautiful without a shadow of sadness,
the joy with which, O Savior,
to Thee We get our praise.2. When I will make the last sigh
and suffer the pangs of death,
That I'm holding firm to You!
voileront When my eyes
And my heart stops beating,
let my body cool down between your arms.
In the heights of heaven ,
Let my spirit praise Your name forever,
While based security in You.
3. At this time of joy when, however near,
Where, born in Your Tenderness,
I can warm myself a new life?
Then, O God, but You saying my thanksgiving,
I can also embrace my arms ,
And always, those who are dear to me.
Yeah, alive, alive forever
Living in Your contemplation,
let my life unfolds relentlessly, always new!
... You came to liberate humanity
from death and evil,
for there are blessings and a happy fate everywhere.
And now with Your Back on Earth,
Everything will be different;
Every man, you lay his hand. ' When Bruno Bauer had sown confusion in his soul, he traces these lines with some friends: "It is written: Ask and you shall receive. For me, I seek truth wherever I hope to find, even one chip. But so far I have not been able to recognize your truth eternal truth. Yes, it is written: Seek and ye shall find. And again: What a man would give a stone to his child asks for bread? So what if it is your Father who is in heaven? Tears come to my eyes as I write this, I am deeply moved, but I feel I will not be lost. I come to God after which my whole soul sighs. This, too, is a testimony of the Holy Spirit. I saw this testimony, and I will die with the same conviction ... The Spirit of God shows me that I am a child of God. '
He was well aware of the danger posed Satan ...
In his book, Schelling, the philosopher in Christ, we find this in the writings of Engels: "Since the terrible French Revolution, an evil spirit, completely new, penetrated a large part of humanity and atheism rears its threatening head in a subtle way and shamelessly so one might think that the time announced by the prophecies of Scripture are fulfilled. See, indeed, that the Bible tells us about the "godless" in the last days. First and Jesus in Matthew 24.11-13: "From many false prophets will arise and deceive many. As a result of increasing lawlessness, the love will grow cold in the many. But he who endures to the end, the same shall be saved. '
"This gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations face. And then the end will come. '
And in verse 24: "He indeed arise false Christs, and false prophets who will produce great signs and wonders, so as to deceive, if possible, even the elect. "In the Second Letter to the Thessalonians 2, 3 et seq. ". . . Prior to coming apostasy and be impious Man, Being Lost, the Adversary, who rises above all that is called God or is worshiped ... His coming to him, Wicked, was marked by the influence of Satan, of all kinds of works of power, signs and wonders as all the deceptions of evil, to address those who are doomed to perdition for not having received the love of the truth which would have resulted in his being saved. Therefore God sends them an influence that leads them astray, which leads them to believe the lie, so that all will be condemned who have refused to believe the truth and sided with evil. "Engels cites Scripture passages as would the theologian knowledgeable.
He continues: "We can not adopt an attitude of coldness or indifference towards the pay of the Lord. No, it's an open and declared hostility it is and instead of so many sects and parties we do not, ultimately, only two camps: Christians and non-Christians. .. We see the false prophets at work among us ... They travel in Germany and trying to penetrate everywhere to spread their satanic doctrine squares and float the banner of Satan from town to town, seducing the hapless youth to drive to the deepest depths of hell and the death. "And he ends his book with the words of the Apocalypse" Behold, I am coming soon. Take care of what you have so that no one can snatch your reward. Amen "(Marx-Engels, Historic critic Complete Edition I, cf. Above).
So this man who wrote such poetry and such warnings against Satan, the man who shed tears asking to be saved from this danger, who admitted that Marx was "possessed of a thousand demons," the same man well became his closest collaborator in the fight to abolish evil until the last vestige of religion and ethics (The Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels).
This is the liberal theology that led so far, it is what Marx and Engels shared with the responsibility of tens of millions of innocent lives killed by Communism.
After this sad interlude long but informative about Engels, let us return to Marx.

* Rolf Bauer, in his book, Genie und Reichtum, describes the extravagant life of Marx as finance report: "When he was a student, a true son to dad, he received 700 thalers a year as pocket money."This was a considerable sum at the time because only 5% of the population had an income greater than 300 thalers. And during his life Marx Engels received the equivalent of six million French francs (figures Marx-Engels Institute).
He kept covet inheritances. One of his uncles being in agony, Marx wrote: "If the dog dies, it will draw me much embarrassment. "What Engels replied:" I am delighted for you to prevent the disease inheritance and I hope that the event will not immediately fatal to occur. '
Finally, "the dog" dies. Read Marx March 8, 1855: "Great news! Yesterday we announced the death at ninety-year old uncle of my wife. The latter will affect about one hundred pounds and even more unless the old dog has left a part of his money to the lady who took her home. '
He had no feelings softer with respect to persons who were, however, much closer than this uncle. He was angry with his mother. In December 1863 he wrote to Engels: "Two hours, a telegram telling me that my mother has just died. It was fate that removes another member of my family. I myself had one foot in the grave, but in the present circumstances my health is more useful than the old woman. I have to go to Trier on inheritance. "... This is all that is to say for the death of his mother.
Any economist he was, Marx lost all the time - and large sums - the stock market.
As the cult of Satan is extremely secret we know only through allusions - often covertly - reports Marx believed her. His life disorders is it not a ring in the chain of elements that we have made in favor of this hypothesis?
It was an intellectual class. Engels also. Yet their correspondence is peppered with obscene in this unusual social rank. Profanity abound, but nowhere do these idealists mention their dream humanist or socialist.
All behavior and conversation were such satanic Marx. Jewish himself, he did not hesitate, however, to publish an anti-Semitic book: The Jewish Question. And he did not hate the Jews. Weitling tells his friend: "The usual topic of conversation Marx is atheism, the guillotine, Hegel stories, stories of rope or dagger. "He did not the Germans:" The only way to wake them, he claimed, is to beat them."And he spoke of the" stupid German people. " And again: "The Germans, Chinese and Jews can be compared to hawkers and small traders. "He spoke of the" daunting pettiness and national Germans "(Kunzli, Psychogram).
He regarded the Russians as sub-human (K. Marx on Russia, Publishing House Zaria - Canada, in Russian). "The Slavic peoples are ethnic trash" (quoted in the New York Times of 25 June 1963).
Just pass successively through several aspects that could lead us to conclude that Marx was really a follower of Satan, a man devoted to the devil. But to continue.
The favorite child of Eleanor Marx was. He called Tussy and often said, "Tussy, this is my portrait. "Let's see what Tussy in turn can teach us.
With the consent of her father, Eleanor married Edward Aveling, a friend of Mrs. Besant, a name in theosophy. Edward gave lectures on topics such as the perversity of God (quite satanic thought! They do not deny the existence of God as atheists - except to give voluntarily exchange. Instead be recognized that God exists, but calling it evil and bad). In his lectures, Edward tried to show that "God is in favor of polygamy and encourages theft. "He claimed the right to blaspheme (The life of Eleanor Marx, Chushichi Tsuzuki, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967).
Suffice it to listen to the poem Theosophical next reminding us that the son's favorite Marx was one of the keynote speakers of the movement. Writings of this kind favored at home and there will be an idea of ​​the spiritual climate that is breathed:

"To you my frantic and daring to
even go up, O Satan, king of the banquet.
hay your splashed, O priest, and thy chants,
For ever, O priest, Satan will stand behind you.Your breath, O Satan, my inspiration to
When the depths of myself I defy the gods.
pontiffs Kings Down, down Kings inhumane
Tien is the lightning that shook the minds.
O soul wander away from the right path,
Satan is merciful. See Heloise.
Like the whirlwind spreading its wings,
He passes, O people, Satan the great!
Hi, great defender of reason!
Towards you ascend the sacred incense and vows:
You have dethroned the god of the priest. ' cited in: The Prince of Darkness by F. Tatford - Advent Testimony Bible and movement).
The relationship between Marxism and Theosophy is not accidental. Theosophy has spread in the West the Hindu doctrine of the nonexistence of the individual soul. That theosophy succeeded by persuasion, Marxism is a whip: it depersonalized and men into robots slaves of the state.

* Another interesting fact. Jacob Riis Auguste had been a disciple of Marx. Sorry heard of his death, he went to London to visit the house where the master lived admired. The family had moved. The only person he could ask was his former maid. She told him about her amazing words: "It was a God-fearing man. When he was very ill he prayed alone in his room in front of a row of lighted candles - the front wearing a kind of meter tape. "This reminds phylacteries, talismans worn by Orthodox Jews for morning prayer. However, baptized in the Christian religion, Marx had never practiced Judaism.Become a bitter enemy of God, he wrote books against religion and raised all her children in atheism. What was just what the maid rite, in his ignorance, took to a prayer? When Jews pray, phylacteries on the forehead, they never have a row of candles before them. Would it be a magical practice? (Mr. Rus manuscripts are in the Library Russel Sage. Revisi View Jacob Riis-ted, Doubleday, 1968)
Found another clue in favor of this hypothesis in a letter to Marx by his son Edgar March 31, 1854 (ME Briefwechsel, Vol II. ME Lenin Institute, Moscow, p. 18) It begins with these words staggering: "My dear devil! " Has anyone ever heard a son to his father speak in these terms? Yet this is a follower of Satan and wrote to a friend. The son had been initiated it too?
Some biographers of Marx indeed had the intuition of the relationship between the "hero" of their book and devil worship, but spiritually unprepared, they could not understand what it was. Their testimony is not necessarily devoid of interest.
The Marxist Franz Mehring wrote in his book Karl Marx (G. Allen & Unwin Ltd., Lon-don 1936): "Although the father of Karl Marx died a few days after the twenty years of his son, he seems to have found with a secret fear the presence of the devil in his favorite son ... Henry Marx did not foresee - how could he? - The rich wealth of bourgeois culture which he had with his children as an inheritance price would only open a new career devil, he had a deep fear. '
Marx died in desperate like all the followers of Satan. On 25 May 1883 he wrote to Engels: "Oh that life is vain and empty, but at the same time how desirable too! '

* Marxism is behind a secret known only to a very small number of its members. Lenin was even able to write: "A half-century later, not a single Marxist can boast of having really understood Marx" (quoted in Hegel by Mr. Kaufman, Doubleday 1965).

3UNDER THE MASK OF ATHEISM I write all this in my random discoveries. Christian thinkers, as indeed every human being, often succumb to the temptation to stubbornly prove some preconceived idea. They do not usually satisfied in this case to present the truth they know they tend to multiply excessively arguments in favor of the thesis that they support.
For me personally, I do not claim irrefutable evidence of belonging to a sect of Marx and Satan worshipers, but I believe there is enough evidence to suggest. Or, at least, to detect an influence of the devil on his life and doctrine, while admitting that he is still missing rings in the chain of elements that would test the hypothesis. I opened fire on others, now to continue this important investigation on the relationship between Marxism and Satanism.
I can not myself undertake this work in the first place mostly because my time is taken within the organization Christian Action for the Church of Silence, whose goal is to help the innocent victims of satanic persecution under Communist domination. Secondly, I am not the saint it would take to widen such a subject. I contented myself before entering as I could in the mysteries of evil cult.
During the initiation ceremony of the third degree must take the following oath: "All in all I will never what I like. "This is deliberately refuse God's command:" Do not follow the desires of more your hearts and your eyes that have led you to prostitute yourself "(Numbers 15:39). Satan worship is very old, older than Christianity. Perhaps the prophet Isaiah alluded when he said: "All we like sheep have gone astray, each following his own way and the LORD has laid on Him (the Savior) crimes of us all" (Isaiah 53.6) .
When a man or woman is admitted to the seventh degree, they swear that their conduct is: "Nothing is true, everything is permitted. "It reminded me that Marx, completing a questionnaire for his daughter, answered the question" What is your favorite principle? "With these words:" The question in all things. "I also remembered what he wrote in the Communist Manifesto, namely, that his goal was not only to abolish all religion but all morality, which would make possible.
During the events of May 68, I was reading bou-leversé a closet at the University of Paris, the mystery of the seventh degree of Satanism synthesized in this pithy phrase: "It is forbidden to forbid" logical consequence of "nothing is true, everything is permitted." Young certainly did not realized the ridiculousness of this statement! Indeed, it is "forbidden to forbid", is equally the fact even ban it!If "everything is allowed", how would it be forbidden to forbid? For these students, permissiveness and freedom go together. But Marxists go further. For them "anything goes" is equivalent to saying that it is forbidden to forbid the old and cruel dictatorship Model Red China and the Soviet Union.
I myself brought by nature to dominate. In studying the great characters of history who have chosen to engage completely tyrannical influence of Satan, I felt bad these trends develop in me. So rather than endanger the most precious jewel of my own, my soul, I decided not to push my further investigations, even if their purpose, highly moral, is to highlight the springs Evil.
Satan is a fallen archangel, but he kept his intelligence archangel. Us men, we can not measure it, and I understood the advice given by a wise Carmelite Prioress: "So send the devil ... the devil, instead of trying to penetrate its secrets! '
I got really nauseated to discover the secrets of Satanism filthy, and I dropped all research in this direction. I thought of the words of Douglas Hunt in his book Researches in the sphere of the occult: "We must put everyone on guard against any participation whatsoever in black magic true or false. Do not touch these things and avoid like the plague all who are involved. Even if everything is fake - as is often the case - however repulsive and bestial things, even if the character is sometimes childish. This only leads to degradation and decay of the soul. When it comes to real power (as I noted, for Marxism) the consequences are not terribly less fatal to the participants. '
Communism is collective demon possession. Solzhenitsyn in The Gulag Archipelago precisely gives us an idea of ​​the disastrous results for the soul and life of human beings.
I am well aware that the arguments I make here are circumstantial evidence. Another faith, the problem should be studied more thoroughly by someone else. But what I have written enough to show me it seems that what the Marxists say Marx is merely a myth. He was not struck by the poverty of the proletariat for the revolution that was the only solution, he did not like the proletarians he called "crazy."
He did not his comrades for communism. Freiligrath he called "pig," Lassalle "the Jewish negro" Comrade Liebknecht "cow" and Bakunin "triple zero".
An activist of the Revolution of 1848, Lieutenant Tchechov, who was drinking with Marx all night, saying that his personal ambition had made him disappear until the last vestige of good.
And finally, he did no more humanity. Mazzini, who knew him well, said: "His mind and his heart overflows destructive more hate than love for men" (All quotes are from Karl Marx, Fritz Raddatz, published by the Hoffman House & Campe, Germany, 1975).
To my knowledge, no testimony from his contemporaries does not contradict the above. "Marx, the man full of love for humanity," is a myth developed only after his death.
He did not hate religion because it is an obstacle to human happiness; instead he wanted to make humanity miserable for time and for eternity. He proclaimed that it was his ideal. His real aim was the destruction of religion. Socialism, the proletariat concern, humanism are all false pretenses.
From reading The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection Darwin, he took pen to write a letter to Lassalle in which he rejoices because God - at least in the natural sciences - had received "the coup de grace. "(Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, by G. de Beer, Oxford University Press, 1974). What is it that actually prevailed in his mind? The desire to rescue the proletariat in misery?How Darwin's theory it could contribute for good or evil? Its primary goal was it not rather destroy religion?
The welfare of workers was only a pretext.
Wherever the proletarians do not fight for their socialist ideals, Marxists will exploit racial differences or conflicts between generations. The important thing for them is that religion is destroyed.

* Marx believed in hell and his program was to send men there. It would be interesting to note on this point in his biography that Bukharin - General Secretary of the Communist International and a leading Marxist theorists of the century - had, from the age of twelve, after a reading of the Apocalypse an irresistible desire to become the Antichrist. Having realized that according to Scripture it must be the son of the great prostitute apocalyptic, he insisted to her mother that she admits having engaged in prostitution (George Katkov, The Trial of Bukharin, Stein and Day, NY 1969).
Even Bukharin, who knew the subject, Stalin said that "it was not a man but a demon." Precisely the first pseudonym chosen by Stalin in his writings was Demonoshvili - which is roughly the equivalent of the devil emulates Georgian (Grani No. 90-4) and Besoshvili - the demonic (A. Avtorhanov - The provenience of Partocraty Posev, Germany)
Mao said: "From the age of eight I hated Confucius. He had his temple in our village and with all my heart I wanted one thing, the destruction of bottom "(Mao Zedong by Mr. Zach Berchtel edict. Germany).
Do you often meet a child of this age and wish nothing but the annihilation of his own religion? Thoughts of this kind can only come beings possessed of the devil.
Solzhenitsyn also in The Gulag Archipelago, says Yagoda, Minister of Internal Affairs in the Soviet Union as favorite occupation was to shoot images of Jesus and the saints. Another satanic ritual practiced in the higher levels of the Communist hierarchy. How does one men representing the proletariat have targeted the image of Jesus, a worker, or the Virgin Mary, a woman of the people?
Pentecostals relate a case which occurred in Russia during the Second World War. One of their preachers had exorcised a demon. The latter possessed before leaving, threatened revenge. But the Pentecostal preacher in question was executed for the faith. The officer who executed it said before: "And now we are quits! "... Agents of communism are they sometimes possessed by the devil and then they are instruments of revenge on the Christians, they are doing everything to overthrow Satan's throne?
In Russia, Dr. Profirevitch had a daughter he had raised in the faith, but she had to attend schools Communists. At twelve, she returned home and told his parents: "Religion is a superstition capitalists.It's completely exceeded our time! She abandoned Christianity altogether and later enlisted in the Communist Party, where she became an agent of the secret police. For parents, the shock was terrible.
In the following, we came to arrest his mother. Is that in communism, nobody has anything of his own, not even his children, nor his wife nor his freedom. The state can take if desired.
With the arrest of his mother, the son wept. A year later, he hung. Dr. Profirevitch found a letter addressed to him: "Father, you condemn me? I am a member of the Communist Youth organization. I had to sign that I would bring everything that is against the Soviet authorities. One day I was summoned by the police and my sister Varia asked me to sign a denunciation against my mother because she was a Christian. It was considered against revolutionary. I signed ... I am guilty of his imprisonment. I ordered spying on you now ... This would lead to the same result. Forgive me, Father, but I decided to kill myself. "The suicide of the son had resulted in the incarceration of the father" (Russkaia Misl, Paris, 13 March 1975).
During a strike organized by the French Communists in 1974 workers were invited to parade in the streets of Paris, chanting the slogan:

"Giscard d'Estaing is fucked up,
the demons are in the street! ' Why namely "demons" rather than "workers" or "the people"? Why this evocation of satanic powers? What do they do with the legitimate demands of the working class for higher wages?
I can understand the rigor Communists have arrested priests and pastors pretext that they were against the Revolution. But how to explain that priests were forced by Marxists to say Mass on feces and urine in Romanian prisons Piteshti? Why obscene mockery of religion? (I Cirja Hell and Back D. Bacu: Piteshti). Why Romanian Orthodox priest Roman Braga (current address is: Romanian Orthodox Bishopric, Jacksonville, Michigan, USA), when he was a prisoner of the Communists, he was seen breaking teeth one at a time beating with an iron bar to compel them to blaspheme? The Communists had explained - to him and others: "If we kill you, you Christians, you will go to heaven. But we do not want you to receive the palm of martyrdom! You must cursing God and you go to hell!"Marxists are so-called atheists who believe neither in God nor devil. In these extreme cases Marxism has just removed his mask atheism to show its true face of Satan.
The persecution of religion by the communists can be explained humanly, but the fury associated with it beyond all reason, according Obviously, satanic origin.
Vetchernaia Moskva Communist newspaper, has spilled the beans: "We do not fight directly believers, or even priests. We fight against God to snatch his followers "(quoted by the priest in Dudko" O nachem oupavaü "YMCA Press, Paris).
The Soviet newspaper Sovetskaya Molodioj of February 14, 1976 describes how under the Tsar Russian Communists entered the church to mock God. Here is their "Our Father" blasphemous and satanic

"Our Father who art in St. Petersburg
cursed be thy name,
Thy kingdom crumbles,
Your will is not done, not even in hell.
give us our bread that you have stolen,
and pay our debts, as we paid yours until now.
And lead us not into temptation more,
But deliver us from evil police Plehve (Prime Minister of the Tsar),
and annihilate the damned government.
But as you are weak and poor in spirit, power and authority,
Whether it is finished with you for eternity.Amen. ' If you want to learn more about the relationship of Marxism and the occult sciences, one can refer to the book by Ostrander and Lynn Cheila Chröder Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1970. We will discover with amazement that the Communist countries of Eastern Europe are much more advanced than the West in search of all the hidden forces manipulated by Satan.
Dr. Edward Naumov, a member of the International Association of parapsychologists, was arrested in Moscow.
Moscow physicist L. Regelsohn, Jewish convert to Christianity, who defended him, we learn the reason for his arrest attempt, from Naumov, to keep the field of psychic life free of absolute domination by the evil forces which failed interested in the science, ultimately, because they saw it as a new instrument of oppression of the human personality.
Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, etc.., The Communist Party invests huge sums in secret psychic research. There are twenty institutes in the Soviet Union, but an iron curtain prevents sealed the West have any idea what is going on (Russkoie Novoye Slovo, July 30, 1975).

* What was, precisely, the contribution of Marx to Satan's plan for humanity? An important contribution, can we say.
The Bible teaches us that God created man in his own image (Genesis 1:26). Until the advent of Marx, man had always been considered as completion, the crown of creation. But Marx was instrumental choice by Satan to lose man, along with his self-esteem, the belief that it is from a glorious past which he will return one day. Marxism is the first systematic and comprehensive philosophy that demeans the notion of man brutally. According to its author, man is essentially an empty stomach that must be met continuously. Its supreme interests are economic. It produces according to its needs and that he comes into contact with other men. This is the basis of society that Marx describes infrastructure. Marriage, love, art, science, religion, philosophy - anything that is not precisely satisfaction belly superstructures are determined ultimately by the state of the stomach.
No wonder therefore that Marx was greatly pleased to read Darwin's book was, in its way, a coup for the man to forget his divine origin and its end. He claims, in fact, that man descended from monkeys and has no other purpose than its mere survival.
The king of nature has been so cleverly dethroned by these two men. Can not directly deal with God, Satan has devalued man in his own eyes by lowering the condition of a slave to his instincts and offspring of animals.
Freud would later complete the work of these two giants of Satanism reducing man basically instinct sexual instinct sometimes sublimated in politics, art and religion. It was the Swiss psychologist Jung returned to the doctrine of the Bible that the religious instinct is fundamental in humans.

4THE CATECHISM RED To complete the picture, a word on Moses Hess, the man who converted Marx and Engels the socialist idea. There is a grave in Israel on which one can read: "Moses Hess, founder of the German Social Democratic Party. '
Red in his Catechism for the German people (political catechisms published by KM Michel, Insel Publ. Germany 1966), he wrote: "What is black? - Black is the clergy! ... These theologians are the worst aristocrats. The priest, in fact, teaches first princes to oppress the people in the name of God, and secondly, he learns to let people bully and exploit the name of God. Thirdly, and most importantly, it gives itself, the idea of ​​God, a comfortable life on earth, while advising people to wait for the sky ... '
"The red flag is the symbol of the revolution permanent until the final victory of the working classes in all civilized countries, ie the Republic Rouge ... The socialist revolution is my religion ... Workers, when they have conquered a country, will go to help their brothers in the world. '
Such was the religion of Hess when he published his Catechism. But in his second edition, he added a few chapters this time, the same religion - socialist revolution - using language to get credit from Christian believers. There is, at the same time as propaganda for the revolution, some kind words for Christianity, the religion of love and humanism. But it should make its message more clear: the hell should not be on earth or the sky beyond. Socialist society will be the fulfillment of true Christianity. Thus Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
Having convinced Marx and Engels the socialist ideal in not hiding from the outset that his aim was "to give the coup de grace to the religion of the Middle Ages" - (his friend Jung says pretty clearly: "Marx God surely succeed in driving his sky ") - there occurred an interesting event in the life of Hess. The man who founded modern socialism also became a proponent of a totally different movement a particular form of Zionism.
Personally, I am a supporter of Zionism. The State of Israel belongs to the Jews by divine right. God, creator of the earth, has repeatedly said by the prophets that gave the land of Palestine to the Jews.But that does not mean I agree with everything indiscriminately Zionists have thought.
Still, I am a Christian, but that does not mean that I agree with everything and are taught by Christians. It would be impossible because Christians are divided among themselves and profess contradictory things. It is the same with regard to the Zionists, there are more than one way: there is a socialist Zionism, religious Zionism and Jewish Zionism Jewish Christians, Zionism and another peaceful, aggressive. There's even a murderer and terrorist Zionism - the Stern group, for example, which has caused the death of many innocent people.
And within Christianity, there is what comes from God, that men have added, but there is also the influence of the devil. Jesus himself did-He not said to one of his apostles that he was a demon?
Zionism is also a mixture. While the fulfillment of a divine plan, it is also a human movement - with all the risks weaknesses and sins. There was even an attempt to create a kind of satanic Zionism fortunately aborted. Indeed Herzl Zionism gave a turn and reasonable in its modern form there remains no trace of Satanism.
Hess, the founder of modern socialism whose goal, just remember, God is chasing his heaven, was, in its time, a type promoter diabolical Zionism intended to demolish the pious Zionism, that of love, understanding and harmony with its neighbors.
This man who had learned the importance of Marx's class struggle, wrote these words in 1862 - that surprise us in his writings: "The struggle of races has priority classes that only comes second" (M. Hess, Rome and Jerusalem, Philosophical Library, New York). It was he who, for the class struggle, an unquenchable fire fanned instead to show how classes cooperate for the common good.
It is thus that the same Hess became the instigator of a deviation of Zionism - Zionism racial, imposing the fight against those who are not of the Jewish race. Just as we reject Marxism satanic, as any Jew or Christian who respects it must dismiss this demonic counterfeit of Zionism.
Hess claims although Jerusalem for the Jews, but "without Jesus, the King of the Jews." It has nothing to do with Jesus! "Every Jew, indeed, does he not in him the makings of a messiah and all Jewish, that of a Mater Dolorosa? "Why, then, did he not make the Jew Marx that was a messiah, an anointed one of God instead of being fully extended in an effort to expel hateful God of heaven?For Hess, Jesus is a Jew and the heathen have deified as their Savior. Neither he nor the Jews seem to need Him as personal Savior.
He does not want to be saved and claimed that the individual search for holiness is likely Indo-Germanic. The ideal of the Jews, he said, must be a "Messianic state" to make the world conform to the divine plan, which is equivalent - as he also recognizes himself in his Catechism Red - to the socialist revolution in Using it for the racial struggle and the class struggle.
Moses Hess, who assigned to Marx, his idol, the task of putting an end to the religion of the Middle Ages and substitute the religion of socialist revolution, wrote these words on his part are quite surprising: "I always was built by the Hebrew prayers. "What say prayers so those who see religion as the opium of the people? We have already seen that the founder of atheism praying before lighted candles and he wore phylacteries. Is that the Jewish prayers, like Christian prayers can be used for the blasphemous ritual of Satan.
Hess had taught Marx socialism inextricably linked with internationalism. Marx notes and well in his Communist Manifesto that the proletariat knows no borders. As for Hess, in his Catechism red, there is no shortage of mock chauvinism Germans.
It would have also done the same with the concept of homeland any other nation in Europe. He criticized the Erfurt program of the German Social Democratic Party because of its unconditional recognition of the national principle. But it is an internationalist exception because for him to remain Jewish patriotism. He writes: "Whoever denies Jewish nationalism is an apostate, a renegade - in the religious sense - is also a traitor to his people and his family. It should be established that the emancipation of the Jews is incompatible with Jewish nationalism Jews should unhesitatingly sacrifice their emancipation. "... "The Jews must, above all, be patriots. '
For my part I agree with patriotic ideas of Hess insofar as they apply to all. I am in favor of any patriotism indeed, whether Jews, Arabs, Germans, French, Americans. It is a virtue if it involves the concern to ensure the happiness of a nation in economic, political, spiritual and religious, provided of course that it is in friendship and cooperation with other nations.
However patriotism Jewish revolutionary socialist who rejects that of all other countries seems highly suspicious: it's like a diabolical plan to hate Jews from all other people. But fortunately no Jew to my knowledge has not accepted the plan of Satan.
The fight racial Hess became the protagonist is as flawed as the class struggle which he was the instigator.
He did not abandon socialism to move towards this particular form of Zionism, but after I wrote Rome and Jerusalem he continued his activity in the world socialist movement.
He does not express his thoughts clearly, so it is difficult to understand. Suffice it to note that, according to him, "the Christian world sees Jesus as a Jew became pagan saint. We, today, he argues in this book, we aspire to a much wider salvation that Christianity has never been able to offer us. " Recall that, according to the Catechism Rouge, salvation is much wider than other socialist revolution.
We might add that Hess was not only the original source of Marxism and who has attempted to create an anti-Zionism God, but he was also the father of the theology of revolution, news theme for World Council of Churches and also some new trends of Catholicism that he is a salvation issue today. Therefore the same single man remained almost unknown, was the spokesman of satanic origin three movements: communism, a hateful racist Zionism and called theology of revolution.
No one can be a Christian if he does not like Jews. Jesus was Jewish race, so the Virgin Mary and all the apostles. Our Hebrew Bible and the Lord himself said: "salvation is from the Jews. "Instead Hess exalts the Jews exactly as if trying to create a violent anti-Semitic reaction. He said that his religion was the socialist revolution and the clergy of all "other" religions was made of crooks. Yes, revolution is the only religion that professes great respect Hess. He writes: "Our religion (Judaism) has its starting point the excitement of a race which, from its appearance on the stage of history, provided the ultimate goal of humanity and urge Messianic times when the spirit of humanity that comes to fulfillment, not this or that particular individual, or only partially, but in the social institutions of all mankind. "(All quotes above are taken from Oeuvres chosen Moses Hess, Berchtel edict., Germany). This time Hess program "messianic" is the victory of the world socialist revolution. The idea according to which the Jewish religion had as its starting point the concept of a socialist revolution atheist is a bad joke and an insult to the Jewish people.
Continuously while speaking in religious terms, Hess does not believe in God. He claims that "our God is none other than our human race united in love." The path to such a union is the socialist revolution where tens of millions of members of this beloved mankind will be tortured and put to death. He does not hide, otherwise it will not accept domination of the sky or the powers of this world, because they have the common characteristic of oppression. There is no good in religion except in the socialist revolution. "It is absolutely pointless and ineffective to raise up the people and true freedom to engage in real life, he says, if we do not release from spiritual bondage, ie the religion. "In the same line, he refers to" the absolutism of heavenly and earthly tyrants over their slaves. "
It is only well including Moses Hess - the one who influenced both Marx, Engels and Bakunin, the three founders of the First International (D. McLellan, Marx before Marxism, Mc Millan), that we will be able to discover the satanic roots of Communism.
This long digression about Hess was therefore necessary because if you do not know, Marx remains impenetrable as he was dragged by her in-socialism.
Repeat here the words of Marx already mentioned above:
"I teach in a tangled jumble word diabolical, so everyone can believe in the truth of what he chooses to think. '
This is so, in fact, the style of Marx. As for books Hess is a more inextricable tangle and diabolical labyrinth where it is difficult to find his way, but must be analyzed to identify possible links with Marx Satanism.
The first book is called Hess: sacred history of mankind. It was, according to him, a work of the Holy Spirit of truth. The day of the launch, he noted in his diary (folio 101): "The Son of God has freed men from their personal slavery, Hess, in turn, the release of political enslavement. "And again:" I am known as John the Baptist to testify to the light. '
At this time, Marx, still opposed to socialism, Hess did not know personally and he even started a book to refute. But, for reasons that escape us, this book was never completed (MARX-ENGELS, full lips, UEO, Moscow, 1927-1935, Vol. 1). He later became the disciple of Hess.
Who is this Hess, the so-called messenger of the Holy Spirit? We have already seen that his avowed aim was to give the deathblow to religion and wreak havoc. In the introduction to his book Judgment, he does not hide his satisfaction that the German philosopher Kant, he argues, "the old beheaded Father Jehovah and all the holy family." Hess puts his own ideas under the guise of the great philosopher. But Kant had no such intentions! He wrote instead: "I have to limit my knowledge to allow the land to my faith. "Hess says that the Jewish religion is dead as well as the Christian religion (Journal No. 1, p. 288), which also does not stop in Rome and Jerusalem to discuss our scriptures, the holy language of our fathers, our worship and the divine law, the ways of Providence and the life of holiness ...
It is not that he has changed his mind at various stages of his life. He said himself in writing his book pseudo-Zionist, he disavows anything in his previous trials atheists (Nieder-Rheinische Zeitung, Volks-15-7-1862). This is a devilish muddle voluntary.
Hess was Jewish and precursor of Zionism. And it is precisely because Marx and others, it was Jewish race some believe that communism is hatched by the Jews. But these seem to forget that Marx wrote an anti-Semitic book, a disciple of his master Hess even on this point. This raises the Zionist Judaism to the naked said in his book On the monetary system (Rheinische Jarbücher, Vol. 1, 18-45): "The Jews in natural history and in the world of animal society had the task of developing humanity into a wild animal, acquitted themselves well in this task professionally. The mystery of Judaism and Christianity has been revealed in the Judeo-Christian modern mystery of Christ's blood as the worship of the ancient Jewish blood - is thus revealed, and this is the mystery of the beast of prey . '
Regardless of whether the meaning of these words is obscure to you: they were "entangled in a tangle evil", but they contain all the hatred is only too obvious. For the sake of argument Hess turn Jewish or anti-Semitic, in the spirit he calls holy and is the inspiration for his writings.
It is possible that Hitler drew his racism from Hess who had learned to Marx as belonging to a class is the decisive factor and also stated the opposite: "Life is the immediate product of the race (Rome and Jeru -salem). Institutions and social as well as religious conceptions are specific and original creations of the race. "" The racial problem is implicit in all the problems of nationalities and freedom.Any past history was a struggle between classes and races. Racial struggle comes first, the classes, second "(ibid.).
Hess how he succeed to overcome all his ideas and conflicting? "I'll go to the sword all citizens who oppose resistance to the forces of the proletariat" (letter to Lassalle, Correspondence Moses Hess, ed. Hague, 1959). Marx said the same thing in other words: "Violence is the midwife who helps the new company born from the bowels of the old" (Capital).

* The first master of Marx was the philosopher Hegel, who did that pave the road to Hess. Marx also took seed in Hegel. For this thinker, Christianity was pitiful compared to the glorious Hellenism."Christians have accumulated such a heap of good reasons for comfort in misfortune that ultimately we should be sorry not to have the possibility of losing a parent once a week, while the Greeks were really evil unhappiness and pain, pain "(Quotes McLellan, cf. above).
Christianity had not waited to be mocked Hegel in Germany, but Hegel was the first to make fun of the very person of Jesus.
We are what food we take makes us. Marx, fueled satanic ideas, could only make a satanic doctrine.

5MARX OF THE MARXIST BASE Usually the Communist organizations based in disguise. All indices above show that, in all probability Communist movements themselves are organizations disguised an occult Satanism. This would also explain that all weapons political, economic, cultural and military used to reduce communism are far proved ineffective. Ways to combat Satanism are spiritual and not a material nature. Otherwise, overwriting an organization like Nazism for example, at the same time contributes to the greatest victory of another organization shock of this family occult Satan!
Himmler, Minister of the Interior of Nazi Germany, thought he was a reincarnation of King Henry the Fowler. He believed possible to occult powers in the service of the Nazi army. Several Nazi leaders, in fact, dipped in black magic.
The founders of communism as well as the modern Nazism have been in contact with supernatural creatures endowed with intelligence, with fallen angels devoid of any moral principle. Marx received from them the stated mission "to put down all religion and morality."
However the simple Marxist base is far from being animated by the same spirit that Marx. He loves humanity and believes he enlisted in an army that fights for the sake of it. He did not intend to be the victim of a bizarre satanic cult. For such a Marxist these lines could be enlightening ...
As for Marxism satanic, it has a materialistic philosophy which makes its followers blind to spiritual realities. There are however more than matter. There is a whole world of the spirit of truth, beauty and ideals of justice ... There's also a world of evil spirits whose head is Satan. He fell from heaven because of his pride and he brought with him first a multitude of angels and the first human couple.Since the fall, his message is perpetuated and increased by every artifice. Thus we see the magnificent creation of God ravaged world wars, revolutions and cons, bloody revolutions, dictatorships, the exploitation of man, racism of all kinds, false religions, the agnosticism and atheism, by the crimes and scams, infidelity in love and friendship, divorce, rebellious children.
Humanity has lost the vision of God.
And what has replaced this vision? Something higher? A Commission of Inquiry into the Anglican Occult met in Australia submitted its report on 13 August 1975. It appears that half of the students in Sydney were involved in the occult and Satanism. In other Australian cities, even finding. Half of the youth involved in witchcraft and black magic. The situation is perhaps not so tragic in other countries of the free world, but anyway the intrusion of Marxism youth goes hand in hand with Satanism, although links between the two are not always apparent.
The creatures have abandoned God. God, Himself, never abandons his creatures. He sent into the world His only Son Jesus Christ. Incarnate love and compassion for all, Jesus lived on earth as a poor Jewish child, as a humble carpenter, and then as a teacher of life. A man trampled, it is evident, can not raise itself, no more than a man drowning can not get out of the water without help. This is why Jesus, fully understanding our inner conflicts, took upon Himself all our sins - even those of Marx and his disciples - and He suffered the punishment of evil we have done. He atoned for our sins by dying on the cross at Calvary after suffered the worst humiliations.
He told us and promised one who puts his faith in Him is forgiven and live forever with Him in heaven.
Even notorious Marxist can receive salvation! It is interesting to note that two Soviet Nobel - Pasternak and Solzhenitsyn - recorded after their criminal ends writings which led Marxism, confessed their faith in Christ.
Do not forget that the ideal of Marx was to go in person to the depths of hell and to bring with him all mankind. Let us not follow this path of destruction, but rather put in the footsteps of Christ, our Saviour to reach peaks with light, wisdom, love, and the sky a glory unspeakable.

CONCLUSION My brochure U.S. in its second edition, revised and enlarged.
The first gave rise to interesting reactions. Many have appreciated as a step forward in the understanding of Marx and gave me sound tracks where I can find other work materials.
More columns in a Dutch magazine theology sought to minimize the importance of this research. "Although the author says, it is quite possible that Marx steeped in black magic, but that ultimately matter. All men, indeed, are sinners, all men have bad thoughts. Do we not alarmed for so little. '
Yes, indeed, all men are sinners, but not all are criminals so far! Yes, all men are sinners, but among these, some are criminals and others are rigid judges that make them appear in judgment. Crimes of Communism are unprecedented. Any other political system could boast of having killed sixty million men in half a century, as is the case for the Soviets? (Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago, Threshold). Sixty million have been killed in Red China. There are degrees in sin and crime. The worst crime is the climax of Satanic influence on the founder of modern Communism. The sins of Marxism, such as Nazism, beyond the ordinary measure. They are evil!
I received letters from followers of Satan glorifying their religion. One of them wrote: "To defend his position, Satanism is simply the Bible as documentary evidence. Think of the thousands of people in this world created in the image of God and destroyed, remember, the fire and brimstone (Sodom and Gomorrah) to a series of terrible plagues, and to top it all, the drowning the entire population of the earth, except Noah's family. All these devastations they have not been caused by God "merciful," the Lord Jehovah? What would have been if it were a God without mercy? '
"On the other hand, throughout the Bible, we do not see anywhere a single death caused by Satan! Therefore, retain it for Satan! '
This emulates Satan probably has not studied the Bible closely. Death, in fact, come into the world because of Satan's deception that led Eve to sin. This emulates Satan draws perhaps too fast conclusions, because God has not yet said its last word with his creation ...
When we started, any table like a horrible mixture of points and lines of different colors and has no meaning. It took twenty years to Leonardo to bring forth his masterpiece, the Mona Lisa. God also takes time to create. In time, it shapes things at the right time he destroyed to give a new shape. The seed has neither beauty nor fragrance must first die state seed to become a flower beautiful and fragrant. Caterpillars should disappear as the chrysalis out of colorful butterflies. The same God allow that men go through the purifying fire of suffering and death. The new heavens and the new earth where justice will prevail will be the apotheosis of creation.
So, those who have followed Satan suffer for an eternity of regret. It is gravely mistaken in choosing Satan!
Jesus spent the flogging and crucifixion. But who wants to know God must look beyond the tomb of Jesus Christ's resurrection and ascension. Instead, Jesus' enemies who plotted his death made only bring their people and their temple destroyed, and they have lost their soul.
Our protest desired grasp God by his reason, but this is not the right way for a creature. You can not understand God, but only the host with the heart in faith.
A Jamaican wonder if America currently exploit his country is not a follower of Satan as well as Marx! No, she is not. Americans are sinners like the rest of mortals, it is true, but the name of followers of Satan can not be given to those who consciously make the devil a worship service. However, if America has a small group of such fans, the entire nation is far from having chosen Satan to God!
I also received letters of Marxists. The most notable of the pen of a Nigerian leader for twenty years of union labor. My writings have helped to see that he had been deceived by Satan. He became a Christian.
I run this French edition of my booklet with the hope that it will inform followers of Satan and Marxists in their search for Jesus.
Obviously it is impossible to make a comparison between Jesus and Marx. Jesus is not bigger or better: It belongs to a totally different category.
Marx was a man and, presumably, a worshiper of evil. Jesus, He is a God who humbled himself to the human condition to save humanity.
Marx proposed an earthly paradise. But when the Soviets tried to make it effective, the result has been a living hell.
Jesus' Kingdom is not of this world. It is a kingdom of love, justice and truth. He calls all men without exception, including Marxists and therefore followers of Satan: "Come to Me, all you who are burdened and weary and I will give you rest" (Matthew 11:28). Believe in Him and you will have eternal life in Heaven's sky.
No compromise possible, therefore, between Christianity and Marxism, and between God and the devil. Jesus came to destroy the works of the evil one (1 John 3:8). By making Its sequel, so Christians try to destroy Marxism, while keeping their love for Marxists individually and wishing win them to Christ.
Some Christians claim to be Marxists. They are wrong or they want to deceive other purpose. We can no more be a Christian and a Christian Marxist devil worshiper at the same time.
There is a chasm between Christianity and communism. A bridge can be built between the two the only condition that Marxists abandon their master inspired by Satan, they repent of their sins and begin to follow Jesus.
This book has no other purpose than to carry it.
Marxists are concerned with social and political problems. They must seek solutions outside of Marxist principles. Moreover, for Marx socialism was only a pretext. Its real objective was diabolical plan to annihilate mankind forever. But Christ wants our eternal happiness.

FIN.Pages 1-95 included the original French.

---

Launched in January 2008.

---

---

KARL MARX ET SATAN.

http://www.barruel.com/karl-marx-et-satan.html

Vous allez lire un petit livre dont le titre est très clair... écrit en 1976 par le pasteur Richard Wurmbrand.
De petit format - 11,5 cm X 18 cm - et peu de pages - 95.
Mais avant, quelques mots.
A priori, le marxisme est à la mode, avec le communisme ET le socialisme : J.O en Chine en 2008, chez les amis de Nicolas Sarkozy, grands criminels contre l'humanité...
Pour info, je vous recommande 1 seul - un - livre intitulé Le livre noir du communisme, crimes, terreurs, répressions, paru en 1997 aux éditions Robert Laffont. Vous "lirez" par vous même.

Mais, le marxisme, c'est sacré, on y touche pas.
Plus de 100 - cent - millions de morts passés et actuels, ce n'est rien, juste des "sous races".

De bons républicains, intouchables, bien à l'aise ici en France.

"IL FAUT SUIVRE LA THÉORIE MARXISTE..." déclaration de fin 1999, belles paroles, criardes à nos chères petites oreilles, prononcées lors du 21° congrès de l'internationale socialiste par le premier ministre de l'époque, trotskiste, monsieur Lionel Jospin le 08 Novembre 1999... (LIRE)

"Nous nous réclamons ouvertement du marxisme, du léninisme et des premières années de la révolution russe, du trotzkysme."
Dixit Arlette Laguiller, le 3 Décembre 2007. ( Source faits-et-documents n° 247 du 15 Décembre 2007).

Sans oublier Olivier Besancenot, le facteur trotzkyste du goulag, avec sa ligue communiste révolutionnaire, et autre Krivine, qui feraient mieux d'y aller... au goulag.
A croire que personne n'a lu Alexandre Soljénitsyne et son Archipel du Goulag.
Mais il est vrai que la télé commande...

Marx, Lénine, Trotzky et leur "frères" étaient de grands admirateurs du coup d'état d'une secte qu'a été la "révolution" française, et la prenaient toujours en exemple, se considérant tous comme ses "enfants" ( lire B. Nicolaïevski et O. Maenchen-Helfen, Karl Marx, éditions Gallimard, 1937).

Ce que sont tous les politiciens "républicains", enfants de 1789, enfants de la veuve, de la secte nommée franc-maçonnerie, tel Nicolas Sarkozy, qui a dit à plusieurs reprises être un jacobin, en bon franc-maçon qu'il est.

Et enfin, le marxisme est la mise à jour d'un système de gouvernement tyrannique et violent déjà proné par Adam Weishaupt, grand maitre de la secte maçonnique de l'ordre des illuminés de Bavière : détruire la religion, abolir la propriété, détruire la famille, complété par la destruction de toute morale, travail obligatoire pour tous, impots fortement progressifs (loi française sortie des loges maçonniques)... le tout de préférence par la violence et en écrasant ses ennemis... ( lire B. Nicolaïevski et O. Maenchen-Helfen, Karl Marx, éditions Gallimard, 1937).
Détruire en totalité l'ancien ordre des choses, et re-batir à leur manière, ce qu'ils savent très bien faire.
Les véritables "ouvriers" du coup d'état violent et sanguinaire, de cette guerre civile, qu'a été la révolution française, ce sont eux, des membres de sectes : francs-maçons, illuminés de Bavière, rose-croix, martinistes, théosophes, sectes lucifériennes ou satanistes - idem -.
Les mêmes idéologies pratiquées lors de la révolution russe avec la franc-maçonnerie, l'occultisme, le martinisme, Maitre Philippe, Papus, Raspoutine, théosophie et madame Blavatsky, entre autres, qui disait : " lucifer, c'est la lumière divine et terrestre, le saint esprit, et satan tout à la foi ". (la doctrine secrète t IV, la famille théosophique s.a, Paris 1925, p 83).

Marxisme, franc-maçonnerie et sectes sont indissociables, socialisme et franc-maçonnerie se complètent fièrement...
Il suffit de lire le livre de Fred Zeller, ex grand maitre de la secte version "grand orient de France", et ex secretaire de Levi Braustein dit Trotzky, intitulé : trois points c'est tout, paru en 1976 aux éditions Robert Laffont.

En Espagne de nos jours, alors que l'on accorde le "titre" de religion à une secte - la scientologie - fondée par Ron Hubbard, sataniste notoire élève de Crowley , gouvernent de bons "républicains" socialistes, potes aux marxistes communistes de la "belle époque"...
Voyez ci-dessous, une "grande oeuvre", parmi tant d'autres, réalisée par ceux que l'on vous présente comme de "bons républicains"... marxistes : Barcelone, 20 Juillet 1936.
Sadisme, nécrophilie, violence, terreur, massacres généralisés...
Techniques similaires en Russie lors de la révolution marxiste, appliquées par les frères Lénine et Trotzky.
Marxisme et horreurs démoniaques se confondent.
C'est "républicain".

Sans parler du national-socialisme d'Hitler, qui voulait fonder lui aussi son "nouvel ordre mondial" avec Alfred Rosenberg et son culte à lucifer, franc-maçonnerie, "illuminés de Bavière", golden dawn, théosophie, rose-croix, Skull and Bones, Vril, Thulé, magie noire et... banques mondiales... (lire Hitler et les sociétés secrètes de René Alleau, Hitler et l'ordre noir de André Brissaud, Wall Street and the rise of Hitler de Antony Sutton).

Et enfin, la continuité est assurée de nos jours par l'ordre "para-maçonniques" aux rituels "teintés" de satanisme, l'ordre des Skull and Bones aux états-unis, avec ses "cercles extérieurs" que sont le CFR, la Trilatérale et le Bilderberg, entres autres sectes.

Ce sont tous ces gens là, ces idéologies criminelles, ces sombres personnages membres de sectes, francs-maçons, rose-croix, théosophes, martinistes, Skull and Bones, et "illuminés", qui poussent à ce nouvel ordre mondial... pour asservir tous les peuples... sous le règne de leur dieu, satan ou lucifer - idem-.

" Nous aurons UN GOUVERNEMENT MONDIAL, que cela nous plaise ou non.
La seule question est de savoir s'il sera créé par conquête ou par consensus."
Dixit James Paul Warburg, administrateur de la banque Kuhn, Loeb and Co., financier de la "révolution" Russe et de ses massacres, s'adressant au Sénat américain le 17-02-1950.

Jacob Shiff, employé de la banque "mondiale" Kuhn, Loeb and Co., donna 20 millions de dollars en or aux deux marxistes criminels Levi Braustein dit Trotsky et Vladimir Ilich Ulyanoff dit Lénine... pour mieux massacrer...
Il est bon de noter que le "chauffe plat" Al Gore... est marié avec une descendante de Jacob Schiff.
Gorbatchev, en bon marxiste, autre promoteur du "nouvel ordre mondial", avec sa "green cross international", est membre de la lucis trust - ex lucifer trust -... à l'ONU.

Et vous savez déjà que " l'O.N.U (comme l'Unesco) est presque entièrement composée de maçons de tous pays "... (Pierre Mariel, Les francs-Maçons en France, Biblio. Marabout - Paris, 1969 - page 204.)

Sans parler du fait que ces gens là vérouillent tout : édition, presse écrite et télévisée, radio, éducation dite nationale... et pensée nationale...
TOUT.
C'est un fait.

Pour finir, voyez les deux images ci-dessous, la première date de 1974 et l'autre de 1980...
Une "invitation" en loge version "grande loge de France", dont les "HAUTS GRADES restent imprégnés de l'esprit des ROSE-CROIX", au nom de Giscard, le "père" de la "conception maçonnique européenne".
Les Rose-Croix sont adeptes de magie sexuelle - avec enfants - et d'occultisme.
On y retrouve "le rite écossais ancien et accepté de MORIN et réformé par PIKE." (LIRE)
Simple rappel, Albert Pike était le "rénovateur du culte luciférien - ou satanique - des temps modernes" (dictionnaire de l'occultisme), et fondateur du Ku-Klux-Klan. Grand maitre universel de la franc-maçonnerie à Charleston, auteur de Morals and Dogma - la "bible maçonnique", il a dit : "Ce que nous devons dire à la foule, c'est : Nous adorons un Dieu, mais c'est le Dieu que l'on adore sans superstition.
A vous, Souverains Grands Inspecteurs Généraux (33e...), nous disons, pour que vous le répétiez aux frères des 32e, 31e et 30e degrés (et non pas aux frères des grades inférieurs) : La religion maçonnique doit être, pour nous tous, initiés des hauts grades, maintenue dans la pureté de la doctrine luciférienne".
Ils ont aussi comme modèle Eliphas Lévi, grand maitre mondial du... satanisme.

Et, toujours le "père" de la conception européenne, Giscard, en bon républicain, aussi membre de la Trilatérale, s'inclinant avec grand respect devant la tombe d'un des plus grand criminel de l'Histoire, celle du "frère" marxiste Lénine.

Giscard, Europe, Euro, ONU, Lénine, marxisme, socialisme, communisme, franc-maçonnerie, même "idéologie" républicaine.
C'est juste la forme qui est différente, mais la "pensée" est unique.

Des faits à vous citer, il y en a des "tonnes"...
Voila qui gouverne la France et le monde...
Des sectes sataniques ou lucifériennes - idem - : franc-maçonnerie, rose-croix, OTO, illuminés, théosophie et autres criminels.
Vous allez croire une seconde que ces "élites" vont penser à vous, à vos enfants, aux pauvres ?
Non !
Le malheur va être généralisé.
Mais, retour au livre...

L'original de Karl Marx et satan, est paru aux éditions Diane de Glendale (U.S.A) sous le titre : Was Karl Marx a Satanist ?

Bonne lecture.Janvier 2008.

---

INTRODUCTION

Avant de devenir économiste et communiste de renom, Marx était un humaniste. Aujourd’hui le tiers de la planète est marxiste. En effet, sous une forme ou une autre, des quantités de gens sont marxistes, même en pays capitaliste. Jusqu’à des chrétiens, voire des hommes d’Eglise — certains de haut rang — sont convaincus que, tout comme Jésus a donné la clé sur la manière d’aller au ciel, Marx a donné la clé sur la manière de venir en aide aux affamés, aux pauvres, aux opprimés de cette terre.

Marx était profondément humain. Une idée le hantait : comment secourir les masses exploitées ? Ce qui les achemine vers l’appauvrissement, affirmait-il, c’est le capitalisme. Selon lui, une fois aboli ce système pourri et après une période de transition sous dictature prolétarienne, l’Etat dépérirait et ce serait le paradis pour le travailleur. Dans la société communiste tout le monde travaillerait, chacun suivant sa compétence, dans des usines ou des fermes appartenant à la collectivité, et chacun serait rémunéré en fonction de ses besoins. Il n’y aurait plus l’Etat pour gouverner les individus, plus de guerres, plus de révolutions, mais seulement une fraternité universelle et perpétuelle.

Cependant pour que les masses accèdent au bonheur, il faut plus que l’abolition pure et simple du capitalisme. Marx écrit : « La destruction de la religion, en tant que bonheur illusoire des hommes, est indispensable à leur bonheur réel. L’appel à l’abandon de leurs illusions sur leur condition est un appel à l’abandon d’une condition qui a besoin d’illusions. La critique de la religion est donc la critique de cette vallée de larmes dont la religion est le halo ». (Introduction à la Critique de la philosophie du Droit, de Hegel).

Marx était anti-religieux parce que, pour lui, la religion fait obstacle à la réalisation de l’idéal communiste qu’il considérait comme la seule solution aux problèmes du monde.

C’est ainsi que les marxistes expliquent leur po­sition. Certains hommes d’Eglise la fondent de la même manière. Le Révérend Osterreicher (Grande-Bretagne) déclarait dans l’un de ses sermons : « Le communisme — quelles que soient actuellement ses diverses formes d’expression — est à l’origine un mouvement destiné à libérer l’homme de son exploitation par l’homme. Or du point de vue sociologique l’Eglise a été et est encore pour une large part du côté des « exploiteurs ». Karl Marx, dont les théories voilent mal une passion authentique pour la justice et la fraternité prenant racine chez les prophètes d’Israël, haïssait la religion car elle servait d’instrument pour le maintien d’un statu quo où des enfants étaient traités en esclaves et travaillaient à en mourir pour que les autres s’enrichissent. Et cela se passait ici même, en Grande-Bretagne. Il y a cent ans, quand on disait que « la religion est l’opium du peuple », ce n’était pas une critique sans fondement... En tant que membres du Corps Mystique nous devons faire amende honorable et savoir reconnaître simplement que nous avons une fameuse dette envers tout communiste ». (Sermon prononcé à Ste-Marie, Fontana, Londres 1968).

Quant à moi, je suis chrétien. J’aime l’humanité et je veux son bien. C’est la raison pour laquelle j’accepterais sans scrupule l’anarchie, le communisme, la démocratie ou le fascisme si cela pouvait apporter aux hommes le bonheur. Pendant longtemps je me suis penché sur l'œuvre de Marx pour mieux comprendre son esprit. J'ai découvert au cours de cette étude un certain nombre de choses surprenantes que j 'aimerais maintenant partager avec mes lecteurs.

Le marxisme fait impact surtout à cause des succès qu'il remporte, mais au fond les succès prouvent-ils quelque chose ? Les sorciers-guérisseurs en ont aussi. Le succès confirme l'erreur tout autant que la vérité et d'ailleurs les insuccès nous sont d'un prix inestimable : ils ouvrent la voie à une vérité plus profonde. Aussi ferons nous l'analyse de certaines oeuvres de Marx sans tenir compte du succès qu'elles ont ou n'ont pas eu.

1A LA CHASSE DE DIEU.

Dans sa prime jeunesse, Karl Marx était chrétien. La première de ses oeuvres écrites - du moins de celles qui nous sont parvenues - s'intitule Union du fidèle au Christ. On y trouve ce beau mot : " Par l'amour dont nous aimons le Christ, nous orientons en même temps nos cœurs vers nos frères qui nous sont intimement liés et pour lesquels Il s'est donné Lui-même en sacrifice " (Marx and Engels, collected works, Vol. 1, International Publishers, N. Y. 1974).

Marx connaissait donc un moyen pour les hommes de devenir frères entre eux : c'est le christianisme.

Il poursuit : " L'union au Christ est capable de procurer l'exaltation intérieure, le réconfort dans la douleur, une confiance paisible et un cœur susceptible d'aimer humainement tout ce qui est noble et grand, non par désir d'ambition ou de gloire, mais à cause du Christ. "

A peu près vers la même époque il écrit dans sa thèse Considérations d'un jeune homme sur le choix d'une carrière : " La religion elle-même nous enseigne que l'Idéal vers lequel tous tendent leur effort s'est sacrifié Lui-même pour l'humanité. Qui oserait lui opposer un démenti ? Si donc nous avons choisi la situation où nous pouvons faire pour Lui le maximum, nous ne pourrons jamais plus être écrasés par le fardeau, puisque ce dernier ne sera pas autre chose que les sacrifices consentis pour l'amour de tous. "

Il n'est conversion ni apostasie qui puisse transformer son homme à cent pour cent. Il arrive souvent que, par la suite, ses anciennes croyances ou incroyances remontent au champ de sa conscience, prouvant ainsi qu'elles n'ont pas été totalement effacées de son esprit mais seulement refoulées dans le subconscient. L'ancien complexe chrétien apparaît en filigrane dans les écrits de Marx longtemps après qu'il soit devenu un militant acharné contre la religion.

Même dans ce livre touffu, consacré à l'économie politique, qu'est Le Capital, livre dans lequel des réflexions sur la religion sont parfaitement déplacées, Marx, le froid adversaire de la religion, écrit, complètement en dehors de son sujet : " Le christianisme avec son culte de l'homme abstrait et plus particulièrement dans ses formes bourgeoises comme le protestantisme, le déisme, etc., est la forme de religion la plus parfaite " (Chapitre I, section IV).

Il ne faut pas oublier que Marx a été d'abord un chrétien convaincu. A sa sortie du lycée, son certificat porte sous la rubrique " Instruction religieuse " cette appréciation : " Sa connaissance de la foi et de la morale chrétienne est lucide et bien fondée. Il possède également dans une certaine mesure l'Histoire de l'Eglise " (Archives pour l'histoire du Socialisme et le Mouvement des Travailleurs, 1925, en allemand).

Peu de temps après l'obtention de ce certificat il se passe dans sa vie quelque chose de mystérieux. En effet, bien longtemps avant que Moses Hess ne l'amène, en 1841, aux convictions socialistes, il était déjà devenu profondément et passionnément antireligieux.

Au cours de ses années d'études supérieures, un autre Marx avait surgi. Lui-même écrit dans un poème : " Je veux me venger de Celui qui règne au-dessus de nous. " Il est donc persuadé que " là-haut Quelqu'un règne " et il a un grief contre lui. Pourtant ce Quelqu'un ne lui a fait aucun mal. Marx appartient à une famille relativement aisée. Il n'a pas connu la faim dans son enfance, et il est plus favorisé que beaucoup de ses condisciples. Qu'est-ce qui a donc pu faire naître en lui cette haine implacable contre Dieu ? Ses motifs personnels nous échappent. Faut-il en conclure que Marx dans cette déclaration est simplement le porte-parole d'un autre ?

A l'âge où tout jeune homme normal nourrit le beau rêve de faire du bien à son prochain et de se préparer à sa carrière, pour quelle raison écrit-il les vers suivants dans son poème " Invocation d'un désespéré " :

" Ainsi un dieu m'a arraché " mon tout "
Dans les malédictions et dans les coups du sort.
Tous ses mondes se sont évanouis
Sans espoir de retour,
Et il ne me reste plus désormais que la vengeance. "
" Je veux me bâtir un trône dans les hauteurs,
Son sommet sera glacial et gigantesque,
Il aura pour rempart la terreur de la superstition,
Pour maréchal, la plus sombre douleur. "
" Quiconque porte vers ce trône un regard sain,
Le détournera, pâle et muet comme la mort,
Tombé entre les griffes d'une mortalité aveugle et frissonnante.
Puisse son bonheur creuser sa tombe ! "
(Karl Marx, Morceaux choisis, Vol. I - New York, International Publishers, 1974)

Les mots " Je veux me bâtir un trône " et l'aveu que de Celui qui y est assis ne peuvent émaner qu'angoisse et terreur n'évoquent-ils pas Lucifer et son programme J'escaladerai les cieux ; plus haut que les étoiles de Dieu j'érigerai mon trône (Isaïe 14,13) ?

Pourquoi Marx veut-il un tel trône ? La réponse se trouve dans un drame peu connu, composé également pendant ses années d'études, intitulé " Oulanem ". Pour expliquer ce titre, il nous faut faire une digression.

Il existe une église de Satan. L'un de ses rites est la messe noire, célébrée à minuit par un prêtre du Malin. Les cierges sont placés sur les chandeliers la tête en bas. Le prêtre est revêtu des ornements, doublures à l'extérieur. Il dit tout ce qui est prescrit dans le livre de prières, mais à rebours, en commençant par la fin. Les saints noms de Dieu, de Jésus et de Marie sont lus à l'envers. Une hostie consacrée volée dans une église reçoit l'inscription " Satan " et sert à une communion dérisoire. Au cours de cette messe noire, une Bible est consumée par le feu. Tous les assistants jurent de commettre les sept péchés capitaux énumérés dans le catéchisme catholique. La cérémonie se termine par une orgie.

A dessein " Oulanem " est l'inversion d'un nom sacré ; c'est l'anagramme d'Emmanuel, nom biblique de Jésus qui signifie en hébreu " Dieu est avec nous ". De tels noms inversés ont leur efficacité en magie noire.

Et maintenant nous ne serons à même de comprendre le drame d' " Oulanem " que si nous écoutons d'abord l'étrange confession de Marx dans son poème " Le ménestrel " :

" Les vapeurs infernales me montent au cerveau
Et le remplissent jusqu'à ce que je devienne fou
Et que mon cœur soit complètement changé.
Regarde cette épée :
Le Prince des ténèbres me l'a vendue. "

Dans les rites d'initiation supérieure du culte satanique, le candidat reçoit une épée enchantée qui lui assurera le succès. Il l'achète au prix d'un pacte, signé du sang pris à son poignet, selon lequel son âme après sa mort appartiendra à Satan. Voici un extrait d'Oulanem:

" Il bat la mesure et donne le signal.
De plus en plus hardiment, je joue la danse de la mort.
Et ils sont aussi Oulanem, Oulanem.
Ce nom résonne comme la mort,
Puis se prolonge jusqu a s'éteindre misérablement.
Arrêtez ! Je le tiens ! Il s'élève maintenant de mon esprit,
Clair comme l'air, aussi consistant que mes propres os. "
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mais j'ai le pouvoir, avec mes bras,
De vous écraser et de vous broyer ( " vous " = l'humanité personnifiée)
Avec la force d'un ouragan,
Tandis que pour nous deux l'abîme s'ouvre béant dans les ténèbres.
Vous allez y sombrer jusqu'au fond,
Je vous y suivrai en riant,
Vous susurrant à l'oreille " Descendez, venez avec moi, mon ami! "

La Bible que Marx avait étudiée durant ses années de lycée et qu'il n'avait pas oubliée dans sa maturité dit que le diable serait enchaîné par un ange et précipité dans l'abîme (abyssos, en grec : Apoc. 20,3). C'est dans cet abîme réservé au diable et à ses anges que Marx souhaite précipiter l'humanité tout entière.

A qui donc Marx prête-t-il sa voix dans ce drame ? N'est-ce pas dépourvu de bon sens de s'attendre de la part d'un jeune étudiant à ce qu'il poursuive comme rêve de sa vie une telle vision de l'humanité entraînée dans l'abîme des ténèbres (les ténèbres extérieures, expression biblique équivalent à l'enfer) tandis que lui-même, secoué d'un rire mauvais, suit ceux qu'il a conduits à l'incroyance ? On ne trouve nulle part au monde la recherche d'un tel idéal, si ce n'est' dans les rites d'initiation de l'église de Satan, et encore dans les degrés supérieurs.
Mais le moment de la mort est arrivé pour Oulanem. Ecoutons ses dernières Paroles :

" Perdu. Perdu. Mon heure est venue.
L'horloge du temps s'est arrêtée,
La maison pygmée s'est effondrée.
Bientôt j'embrasserai sur mon sein l'éternité,
Bientôt je proférerai sur l'humanité
D'horribles malédictions. "

Marx aimait ce mot de Méphistophélès dans Faust : " Dans l'existence tout mérite la destruction. " " Tout ", y compris le prolétariat et les camarades. Marx, dans Le 18 Brumaire, a cité ces paroles. Staline les a prises à la lettre, allant jusqu'à détruire sa propre famille.

La secte de Satan n'est pas matérialiste. Elle croit à la vie éternelle. Oulanem, personnage à qui Marx prête sa voix, ne la conteste pas. Il affirme son existence, mais elle consiste en une vie de haine poussée au paroxysme.

Notons en passant que, pour les diables, éternité est synonyme de tourments. C'est ainsi que Jésus s'entendit reprocher : " Es-tu venu ici pour nous tourmenter avant le temps ? " (Mat 8,29)

Marx poursuit :

" Ah ! l'éternité, notre tourment éternel,
Une mort indicible et incommensurable,
Abjecte, artificiellement conçue pour nous narguer,
Nous autres, rouages aveuglément mécanisés,
Faits pour être les calendriers absurdes
Du Temps et de l'Espace,
Sans autre objet que de se trouver là
Pour être détruits. "

Nous commençons un peu à comprendre ce qui était arrivé au jeune Marx. Il avait eu des convictions chrétiennes, mais il n'avait pas mené une vie conforme à ces principes. Sa correspondance avec son père fait foi des grosses sommes d'argent gaspillées dans les plaisirs et de ses perpétuelles disputes avec l'autorité de ses parents pour ce motif et pour d'autres encore. C'est alors, vraisemblablement, qu'a pu avoir lieu son endoctrinement dans l'église hautement secrète de Satan et qu'il a été initié à ses rites. Satan parle par la bouche de ses adorateurs qui le voient au cours d'hallucinations orgiaques. Et c'est ainsi que Marx n'est pas autre chose que son porte-parole lorsqu'il déclare : " Je veux me venger de Celui qui règne là-haut. "

Ecoutons plutôt la fin d'Oulanem :

" S'il y a quelque chose capable de détruire,
Je m'y jetterai à corps perdu,
Quitte à mener le monde à la ruine.
Oui, ce monde qui fait écran entre moi et l'abîme,
Je le fracasserai en mille morceaux
A force de malédictions ;J'étreindrai dans mes bras sa réalité brutale,
Dans mes embrassements il mourra sans un mot
Et s'effondrera dans un néant total,
Liquidé, sans existence :
Oui, la vie, ce sera vraiment cela ! "

(Ces citations sont tirées du livre de Robert Payne, The Unknown Karl Marx, - Karl Marx inconnu - New York University Press, 1971).

Dans Oulanem, Marx fait exactement comme le diable : il livre à la damnation toute la race humaine. C'est sans doute le seul drame au monde où tous les acteurs soient pleinement conscients de leur propre corruption, qu'ils ne craignent d'ailleurs pas d'étaler et dont ils font état avec conviction. Pas de noir et blanc. Il n'y a ici ni Claude et Ophélie, ni Iago et Desdémone, tout est noir et révèle les traits de Méphistophélès. Tous les personnages sont des suppôts de Satan, corrompus, damnés.

A l'époque où il écrit cela, Marx, génie précoce, n'a pas vingt ans. Il a déjà fait le programme de sa vie. Pas un mot sur le service de l'humanité, le prolétariat ni le socialisme. Il veut mener le monde à sa perte. Il veut se bâtir un trône " qui aura pour rempart le frisson des hommes ".

De ce temps-là également datent certains passages à mots couverts de la correspondance échangée entre Karl Marx et son père. Le fils écrit : " Le rideau est tombé. Mon Saint des Saints s'est déchiré et il a fallu installer de nouveaux dieux. " Ces lignes du 10 novembre 1837 sont d'un jeune homme qui, jusque-là, avait fait profession de christianisme. Il avait déclaré précédemment que le Christ était dans son cœur. Il n'en est plus ainsi désormais. Qui sont " les nouveaux dieux " installés à sa place ? Son père lui répond : " Je me suis abstenu d'insister pour avoir une explication sur une question très mystérieuse, bien qu'elle me paraisse fort douteuse. " Quelle était cette question mystérieuse ? Aucun des biographes de Marx n'a encore donné l'interprétation de ces mots étranges.

Werner Blumeberg, dans son livre Portrait de Marx, cite une lettre du père de Marx à son fils. Elle est datée du 2 mars 1837 : " Ton avancement, l'espoir de voir un jour ton nom hautement réputé et ton bien-être en ce monde ne sont pas les seuls désirs de mon cœur. Ce sont là, il est vrai, des rêves longtemps caressés ; je puis cependant t'assurer que leur réalisation ne m'aurait pas rendu heureux. Mais si ton cœur demeure pur, s'il bat avec humanité et si nul démon ne réussit à le priver de ses sentiments les plus nobles, alors seulement je serai parfaitement heureux. " Qu'est-ce qui a soudain poussé le père à exprimer sa crainte d'une influence démoniaque sur son jeune fils bon chrétien jusque-là ? Etait-ce les pièces de vers qu'il avait reçus de lui comme cadeau d'anniversaire pour ses cinquante-cinq ans ?

Voici une autre citation où Marx, dans son poème Sur Hegel, révèle lui-même sa pensée, inspirée de Hegel : " J'enseigne des mots enchevêtrés dans un embrouillamini diabolique, ainsi chacun peut croire vrai ce qu'il choisit de penser. "

Ailleurs, dans le poème La vierge pâle, il avoue :

" Ainsi j'ai perdu le ciel,
Je le sais très bien.
Mon âme naguère fidèle à Dieu
A été marquée pour l'enfer."

Cela se passe de commentaire.

Au début, Marx avait des ambitions d'artiste. Mais ses poèmes et drames, dépourvus de valeur littéraire, ne connurent aucun succès ; ils sont cependant utiles pour nous dévoiler l'état de son cœur.

L'échec en peinture et en architecture nous a donné un Hitler. L'échec dans le genre dramatique, un Goebbels. L'échec en philosophie et en peinture nous a valu respectivement deux autres criminels de guerre, Rosenberg et Streicher. Quant à Marx, obligé de renoncer à la poésie, il entre au nom de Satan dans une carrière révolutionnaire contre une société qui n'avait pas su apprécier ses oeuvres. Evidemment il ne s'agit là que d'un motif - entre autres - de sa révolte absolue. Une autre cause : il était méprisé en tant que juif.

Deux ans plus tard le jeune Marx écrit " La différence entre la philosophie de la nature chez Démocrite et chez Epicure " où il fait sienne, dans la préface, la déclaration d'Eschyle : " Je nourris de la haine pour tous les dieux. " Il atténue quelque peu cette affirmation en disant qu'il est contre tous les dieux sur terre et dans le ciel qui ne reconnaissent pas comme déité suprême la conscience de l'homme.

Marx était l'ennemi déclaré de tous les dieux - lui qui avait acheté son épée au Prince des ténèbres. Il s'était fixé comme but d'entraîner l'humanité tout entière dans l'abîme de perdition et de l'y rejoindre en ricanant.

Marx a-t-il réellement acheté son épée à Satan ?

Dans un livre intitulé " The moor and the general. Remembrances about Marx and Engels ", (Editions Dietz, Berlin 1964) sa fille Eleanor nous dit que lorsqu'elles étaient petites, elle et ses sœurs, leur père se plaisait à leur raconter des histoires. Il y en avait une surtout qu'elle aimait entre toutes ; il y était question d'un certain Hans Röckle. Mais laissons-lui la parole : " Le récit en durait des mois et des mois car c'était une histoire très longue et qui n'en finissait plus. Hans Röckle était un sorcier... il avait un magasin de jouets... et beaucoup de dettes !… Malgré sa qualité de sorcier, sa caisse était toujours vide, aussi fut-il contraint de vendre au diable, pièce par pièce, toutes ces jolies choses qui lui appartenaient... Plusieurs de ces aventures étaient terrifiantes et nous faisaient dresser les cheveux sur la tête. "

Est-ce normal qu'un père de famille parle ainsi à des jeunes enfants de choses horribles ayant trait à la vente au démon de ce qu'ils ont de plus cher ? Robert Payne dans Marx (Simon and Schuster, New-York, 1968) fait allusion à cela avec abondance de détails ressemblant à ceux fournis par Eleanor. Il insiste sur le fait que Röckle, le magicien, était très malheureux et que c'est bien à contrecœur qu'il finissait par consentir à céder ses jouets, cherchant jusqu'au dernier moment à les retenir. Mais son pacte avec le diable était signé et il n'y avait donc pas moyen d'y échapper.

L'auteur ajoute : " Ces histoires interminables étaient, selon toute probabilité, une autobiographie... Marx avait la vision du monde propre à Satan ; il en avait aussi la malignité. D'ailleurs il semble bien parfois être conscient de faire l'œuvre du Mal. "

Quand il terminait Oulanem et les autres écrits de jeunesse où il avoue avoir fait alliance avec le diable, Marx ne pensait pas du tout au socialisme. Il l'avait même combattu. Il était rédacteur d'une revue allemande, " Rheinische Zeitung ", " qui n'accorde même pas de valeur théorique aux idées communistes sous leur forme actuelle et qui souhaite encore moins leur réalisation pratique, la trouvant, de toutes façons, impossible... Des tentatives de la part des masses en vue de promouvoir ces idées communistes sont à accueillir par une canonnade dès qu'elles deviennent un danger... "

Parvenu à ce stade, Marx rencontre Moses Hess, l'homme qui jouera dans sa vie le rôle le plus important, celui qui lui a fait embrasser l'idée socialiste. Mais ce n'est pas ce que dit Hess à son sujet : " Docteur Marx - mon idole - qui donnera le coup de pied fatal à la religion et à la politique du Moyen Age. " " Donner un coup de pied à la religion " est donc bien son but principal. Un autre ami de Marx à cette époque, Georges Jung, écrit d'une manière encore plus claire en 1841 : " Marx va sûrement chasser Dieu de son ciel et il fera lui-même son procès. Il prétend que la religion chrétienne est l'une des plus immorales " (Conversations avec Marx et Engels. Insel éditeur, Allemagne, 1973). Rien d'étonnant puisque Marx croyait que les premiers chrétiens avaient même égorgé des hommes et mangé leur chair.

Telles étaient donc les prévisions de ceux qui avaient initié Marx aux arcanes du satanisme. Il est absolument faux, par conséquent, qu'il nourrissait le grand idéal social d'aider l'humanité et que, la religion étant à ses yeux un obstacle à la réalisation de cet idéal, il avait adopté pour cela une attitude anti-religieuse. C'est tout le contraire. Marx haïssait tous les dieux sans exception et jusqu'à la notion même de dieu. Il s'était porté volontaire pour " chasser Dieu à coups de pied. "Le socialisme ne constitue pour lui qu'un appât pour attirer prolétaires et intellectuels à cet idéal diabolique. Lorsque les Soviets, au début, prirent comme slogan: " Chassons les capitalistes de la idole - qui donnera le coup de pied fatal àla religion et à la politique du Moyen Age. "" Donner un coup de pied à la religion " est donc bien son but principal. Un autre ami de Marx àcette époque, Georges Jung, écrit d'une manière encore plus claire en 1841 " Marx va sûrement chasser Dieu de son ciel et il fera lui-même son procès. Il prétend que la religion chrétienne est l'une des plus immorales " (Conversations avec Marx et En gels. Insel éditeur, Allemagne, 1973). Rien d'étonnant puisque Marx croyait que les premiers chrétiens avaient même égorgé des hommes et mangé leur chair.

Telles étaient donc les prévisions de ceux qui avaient initié Marx aux arcanes du satanisme. Il est absolument faux, par conséquent, qu'il nourrissait le grand idéal social d'aider l'humanité et que, la religion étant à ses yeux un obstacle à la réalisation de cet idéal, il avait adopté pour cela une attitude anti-religieuse. C'est tout le contraire. Marx haïssait tous les dieux sans exception et jusqu'à la notion même de dieu. Il s'était porté volontaire pour " chasser Dieu à coups de pied. "Le socialisme ne constitue pour lui qu'un appât pour attirer prolétaires et intellectuels à cet idéal diabolique. Lorsque les Soviets, au début, prirent comme slogan : " Chassons les capitalistes de la terre et Dieu du ciel ", ils étaient simplement fidèles à l'héritage reçu de Marx.

*

J'ai parlé plus haut de l'inversion des noms comme procédé de la magie noire. Or les inversions sont tellement ancrées dans la pensée de Marx qu'il en fait usage partout. Au livre de Proudhon " Philosophie de la misère " il répond par un autre qu'il intitule " La misère de la philosophie ". " Il nous faut employer, dit-il, au lieu de l'arme de la critique, la critique des armes, " etc.

L'aspect hirsute de Marx avec ses cheveux et sa barbe ne vous a-t-il jamais posé question ? Les hommes de son temps portaient en général la barbe, mais pas comme la sienne ! ni des cheveux aussi longs. L'allure de Marx est typique des adeptes de Johanna Southcott, prêtresse d'une secte extravagante qui prétendait être en relations avec le démon Shiloh (Conversations entre Marx et Engels). Il est curieux de constater qu'en 1814, quelque soixante ans après sa mort, " le groupe de Chatham des Southcottians comptait dans ses rangs un militaire, James White, qui, après son temps de service aux Indes, revint diriger le groupe local, répandant encore la doctrine de Johanna en lui donnant une coloration communiste " (James Hastings, Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. N. Y. Charles Scribner's Sons, 1921, XI, 756).

Karl ne parlait guère métaphysique en public, mais nous pouvons reconstituer sa pensée en nous référant aux hommes à qui il était associé. Parmi eux Michel Bakounine, membre de la Première Internationale, écrivait : " Satan est le premier libre-penseur et sauveur de ce monde. Il libère Adam et imprime sur son front le sceau de l'humanité et de la liberté en faisant désobéir " (Dieu et l'Etat, citations des Anarchistes, édité par Paul Berman, Praeger éditeur, N. Y. 1972).

Bakounine ne se contente pas de faire le panégyrique de Lucifer, il a également un programme concret de révolution - mais pas pour libérer les pauvres de l'exploitation. " Dans cette révolution, écrit-il, il nous faudra réveiller le diable chez le peuple et exciter en lui les passions les plus viles " (Cité dans Dzerjinski par R. Gul, " Most " Pub. House, New-York, en russe).

C'est précisément avec ce Bakounine dont le programme est si étrange que Karl Marx a créé la Première Internationale. C'est lui qui nous révèle que Proudhon, autre grand penseur socialiste et à l'époque ami de Karl Marx, " adorait Satan ", lui aussi. Proudhon avait été présenté à Marx par Hess ; il avait également le même style chevelu-barbu typique de la secte satanique de Johanna Southcott au XIXe siècle (Conversations avec Marx et En gels, Insel Verlag, 1973, Allemagne).

Dans son ouvrage " Sur la justice dans la révolution et dans l'Eglise ", Proudhon déclare que Dieu est le prototype de l'injustice. " Nous atteignons à la connaissance malgré lui, nous nous procurons le bien-être malgré lui, nous arrivons à la société malgré lui encore. Chaque pas en avant est une victoire où nous l'emportons sur le divin. "

Il s'exalte : " Dieu est stupidité et lâcheté, Dieu est hypocrisie et fausseté, Dieu est tyrannie et pauvreté, Dieu est mauvais. Partout où l'humanité s'incline devant un autel, esclave des rois et des prêtres, elle sera condamnée... Je jure, ô Dieu, la main levée vers le ciel, que tu n'es rien d'autre que l'exécuteur de ma raison, le sceptre de ma conscience... Dieu est essentiellement anti-civilisé, anti-libéral, anti-humain. " Proudhon déclare que Dieu est mauvais parce que l'homme, sa création, est mauvais. Mais de telles pensées ne sont pas originales : on les trouve d'ordinaire dans les sermons du culte de Satan.

Quand il se brouilla plus tard avec Proudhon, Marx écrivit un livre pour réfuter sa « Philosophie de la misère » où se trouvent les citations ci-dessus. Il contredit sa doctrine économique sur des points secondaires mais il n’a aucune objection sur sa révolte démoniaque contre Dieu. Il convient ici de souligner avec force que Marx et ses disciples, même s’ils étaient anti-Dieu, n’étaient pas pour autant des athées comme l’avancent pour­tant les communistes d’aujourd’hui. En d’autres termes, ils prouvaient leur haine pour un Dieu en qui ils croyaient en le dénonçant ouvertement et en l’insultant. Ce n’est pas son existence qu’ils remettaient en cause, mais sa suprématie.

Lors de l’insurrection de la Commune de Paris en 1871, le communard Flourens déclarait : « No­tre ennemi, c’est Dieu. La haine de Dieu est le commencement de la sagesse » (Philosophie du Communisme, Introduction par Charles Boyer, Fordham University Press, N. Y.)

Marx louait hautement les communards qui pro­clamaient ouvertement cet objectif. Mais quel rap­port cela peut-il bien avoir avec une distribution équitable des biens ou de meilleures institutions sociales ? Il ne s’agit là que d’un masque pour dissimuler le but véritable : l’extermination totale de la foi en en Dieu et de son culte. La preuve en sont aujourd’hui des pays comme la Chine (rouge), l’Albanie et la Corée du Nord où toutes les églises, mosquées et pagodes ont été fermées.

Marx a composé des poèmes très intéressants sur ce thème. De l’avis général ils n’ont aucune valeur littéraire, mais les pensées exprimées sont révélatrices. Dans « La prière d’un désespéré » et « Orgueil humain », la prière suprême de l’homme est pour sa propre grandeur. Si l’homme est condam­né à périr à cause de sa propre grandeur, ce sera la catastrophe cosmique, mais il mourra en être divin, pleuré des démons. Dans sa ballade intitulée « Le ménestrel » il célèbre la plainte du chanteur contre un dieu qui ne connaît ni ne respecte son art, qui émergeant du ténébreux abîme des enfers, « ensorcèle l’esprit et séduit le cœur - et sa danse est une danse macabre ». Le ménestrel tire son épée et l’enfonce dans le cœur du poète.

« L’art émergeant du ténébreux abîme des enfers ensorcelant l’esprit », cela évoque les paro­les du révolutionnaire américain Jerry Rubin dans « Do it » : « Nous avons associé jeunesse, musique, sexe, drogue, révolution avec trahison ; c’est là quelque chose de bien difficile à dépasser. »

Dans un autre poème où il avoue que son but n’est pas d’améliorer le monde, pas plus que de le réformer ou de le mettre en état de révolution, mais bien de le précipiter purement et simplement à sa ruine pour en jouir, Marx déclare notamment :

« Dédaigneusement je jetterai mon gant
A la face du monde
Et verrai s’effondrer ce géant pygmée
Dont la chute n’éteindra pas mon ardeur.
Puis comme un dieu victorieux j’irai au hasard
Parmi les ruines du monde
Et, donnant à mes paroles puissance d’action,
Je me sentirai l’égal du Créateur.»

(de la traduction du D. Mc Lellan de « Marx before marxism », McMiIlan)

Ce n’est pas sans lutte intérieure, en effet, qu’il choisit Satan. Ses poèmes furent achevés lors d’une grave maladie causée par la violente tempête déchaînée dans son cœur. Il note alors combien il se sent vexé de devoir se faire une idole d’une idée qu’il déteste. Il en tombe malade (ibidem).

La raison majeure de la conversion de Marx au communisme apparaît clairement dans une lettre de son ami Georges Jung à Ruge. Il n’est pas question de l’émancipation du prolétariat ni d’un ordre social meilleur. Lisons plutôt : « Si Marx, Bruno Bauer et Feuerbach s’associent pour fonder une revue politico-théologique, Dieu fera bien de s’entourer de tous ses anges et de se laisser aller à se plaindre car ces trois-là réussiront certainement à le chasser du ciel... » (Cité par Mc Lellan, voir ci-dessus).

2DE LA THEOLOGIE LIBERALE AU COMMUNISME

Tous les adeptes militants de Satan ont des vies privées tourmentées. C’est également le cas de Marx. Arnold Kunzli dans son livre « Karl Marx­ A psychogram » (Europa-Verlag, Zurich 1966), raconte sa vie qui mena au suicide deux de ses filles et un gendre. Trois enfants moururent de malnu­trition. Sa fille Laura, épouse du socialiste La­fargue, dut aussi conduire au cimetière trois de ses enfants après quoi elle se suicida avec son mari. Une autre de ses filles, Eleanor, décida avec son mari d’en faire autant ; elle mourut mais lui, à la dernière minute, renonça à son projet. Les familles des adeptes de Satan sont maudites. Marx ne se sentait aucune obligation de tra­vailler pour gagner le pain de sa famille. Il au­rait pu facilement le faire, doué comme il était pour l’étude des langues, mais il préférait vivre aux crochets d’Engels. Il avait eu de sa domestique un enfant naturel dont il attribua plus tard la paternité à Engels. Ce dernier accepta de jouer la comédie. Il buvait énormément. David Riazanov, directeur de l’institut Karl Marx à Moscou, y fait allusion dans son livre : Karl Marx le penseur, l’homme et le lutteur. (International Publishers, N. Y., 1927).

Puisque nous venons de dire un mot de Engels, nous pouvons ajouter que celui-ci avait été élevé dans une famille pieuse. Dans sa jeunesse il avait même composé quelques beaux poèmes chrétiens. Nous ignorons en quelles circonstances il perdit la foi, mais voici ses premières impressions après sa rencontre avec Marx : « Qui entre en chasse avec une sauvage ardeur ? - Un homme sombre de Trèves (lieu de naissance de Marx), un monstre remarquable. Il ne marche ni ne court, il pivote sur ses talons plein de rage et de colère comme s’il voulait attraper l’immense tente des cieux et la jeter sur la terre. Il bat l’air de ses bras, les étirant très haut. Ses poings sont serrés, menaçants, et il n’arrête pas de rager comme si dix mille diables l’avaient saisi par les cheveux » (M. Engels, Morceaux choisis en allemand, tome supplémentaire II, p. 301).

Engels avait commencé à douter de sa foi chrétienne après avoir lu un livre du théologien libéral Bruno Bauer. Son cœur avait été le théâtre d’un grand combat. Il écrivait à cette époque : « Je prie tous les jours et même à longueur de journée depuis que je me suis mis à douter, mais je ne peux pourtant pas revenir en arrière. Les larmes me viennent aux yeux tandis que j’écris » (cité dans Karl Marx de Franz Mehring, G. Allen & Unwin, Londres, 1936). De fait Engels ne retrouva pas la voie du retour à la parole de Dieu et il commença à suivre celui qu’il avait nommé « le monstre possédé par des milliers de diables ». C’était l’expérience d’une contre-conversion.

De quelle étoffe était donc ce Bruno Bauer, théologien libéral qui a joué un rôle décisif dans la destruction de la foi chrétienne chez Engels et qui a également réussi à donner confiance à Marx pour aller de l’avant dans sa voie nouvelle d’anti-christianisme ? A-t-il affaire, lui aussi, aux démons ? Ecoutons ce qu’il en dit lui-même dans une de ses lettres à Arnold Ruge, un ami commun de tous les trois, le 6 décembre 1841 :

« Je suis en train de donner une série de conférences ici, à l’Université, et il y a foule. Je ne me reconnais pas moi-même quand je profère des blasphèmes du haut de ma chaire ! Ils sont si forts que ces jeunes - que nul pourtant ne devrait scandaliser - en ont les cheveux qui se dressent sur la tête. Tandis que je les prononce, je ne puis m’empêcher de penser avec quelle piété, à la maison, je compose une apologie des Saintes Ecritures et de la Révélation. En tout cas, c’est un bien méchant démon qui s’empare de moi chaque fois que je monte en chaire, et je suis si faible que je suis incapable de faire autrement que de lui céder... Mon esprit de blasphème ne me laissera de trêve que si j’obtiens l’autorisation de prêcher ouvertement en tant que professeur du système athée » (Marx-Engels ; Historic critic complete édition - Archiv Verlags-gesellschaft, Frankfurt a. Main, 1927, vol I, 1).

L’homme qui convainquit Engels de devenir communiste était le même qui avait convaincu Marx auparavant. Hess relate à la suite de sa rencontre avec Engels à Cologne : « Il me quitta en communiste super militant. Voilà comment j’exerce des ravages! » (Moses Hess, OEuvres choisies, éd. Joseph Melzer, Cologne 1962). « J’exerce des ravages », (Moses Hess, OEuvres choisies, éd. Joseph Melzer, Cologne 1962). « J’exerce des ravages », était-ce donc là le but suprême de la vie de Hess ? C’est en tout cas celui de Lucifer.

*

Les traces du chrétien qu’il avait été ne disparurent jamais de l’esprit d’Engels. En 1865, il exprime son admiration pour l’hymne de la Réforme : C’est un rempart que notre Dieu. Il dit que c’est un hymne triomphal, une sorte de Marseillaise du XVIe siècle » (Introduction à la dialectique de la nature). On pourrait trouver d’autres propos analogues de caractère pro-chré­tien chez Engels.

Sa tragédie est plus bouleversante et plus poignante encore que celle de Marx. Ecoutons ce beau poème de jeunesse, d’inspiration chrétienne, composé par celui-là même qui deviendrait plus tard le bras droit de Marx dans sa lutte destructrice contre la religion :

1. « Jésus-Christ, Seigneur, Fils Unique de Dieu,
Daigne descendre de Ton trône des cieux
Pour venir sauver mon âme.
Descends avec toutes tes bénédictions,
Toi, Lumière de la Sainteté du Père !
Permets que je Te choisisse.
Oh ! qu’elle est aimable, belle sans ombre de tristesse,
La joie avec laquelle, ô Sauveur,
Nous faisons monter vers Toi notre louange.2. Quand je rendrai le dernier soupir
Et souffrirai les affres de la mort,
Que je m’accroche ferme à Toi !
Lorsque mes yeux se voileront
Et que mon cœur cessera de battre,
Que mon corps se refroidisse entre Tes bras.
Dans les hauteurs du ciel,
Que mon esprit loue Ton Nom éternellement,
Tandis qu’il reposera en sécurité en Toi.
3. A quand ce temps de joie, proche néanmoins,
Où, né de Ton sein de Tendresse,
Je pourrai me réchauffer d’une vie nouvelle ?
Alors, ô Dieu, tout en Te disant mes actions de grâces,
Je pourrai aussi enlacer de mes bras,
Et pour toujours, ceux qui me sont chers.
Oui, vivant, vivant pour toujours,
Vivant dans Ta contemplation,
Que ma vie se déroule inlassablement, toujours neuve !
… Tu es venu libérer l’humanité
De la mort et du Mal,
Pour qu’il y ait des bénédictions et un sort heureux partout.
Et désormais avec Ton Retour sur la Terre,
Tout sera différent ;
A chaque homme, Tu donneras sa part. »

Quand Bruno Bauer eut semé le trouble dans son âme, il trace ces lignes à quelques amis : « Il est écrit : Demandez et vous recevrez. Pour moi, je cherche la vérité partout où j’ai l’espoir d’en trouver, fût-ce une bribe. Or jusqu’ici je n’ai pas réussi à reconnaître en votre vérité la vérité éternelle. Oui, c’est écrit : Cherchez et vous trouverez. Et encore : Quel homme donnerait une pierre à son enfant qui lui demande du pain ? Que dire alors s’il s’agit de votre Père qui est dans les cieux ? Les larmes me montent aux yeux tandis que j’écris cela ; je suis profondément ému mais, je le sens, je ne serai pas perdu. Je viendrai vers mon Dieu après lequel mon âme tout entière soupire. Cela aussi, c’est un témoignage de l’Esprit Saint. Je vis de ce témoignage, et je mourrai avec la même conviction... L’Esprit de Dieu témoigne en moi que je suis enfant de Dieu. »

Il avait donc parfaitement conscience du danger que constituait Satan...

Dans son livre, Schelling, the philosopher in Christ, nous trouvons ceci sous la plume d’Engels : « Depuis la terrible Révolution française, un esprit diabolique, complètement nouveau, a pénétré une grande partie de l’humanité et l’athéisme dresse sa tête menaçante d’une manière subtile et sans pudeur si bien que l’on pourrait penser que les temps annoncés par les prophéties de l’Ecriture sont accomplis. Voyons, en effet, ce que la Bible nous dit des « sans Dieu » dans les derniers temps. Et d’abord Jésus dans Matthieu, 24,11-13 : « De faux prophètes surgiront nombreux et abuseront bien des gens. Par suite de l’iniquité croissante, l’amour se refroidira chez le grand nombre. Mais celui qui aura tenu bon jusqu’au bout, celui-là sera sauvé. »

« Cette Bonne Nouvelle du Royaume sera proclamée dans le monde entier, en témoignage à la face de toutes les nations. Et alors viendra la fin. »

Et, au verset 24 : « Il surgira en effet des faux Christs et des faux prophètes qui produiront de grands signes et des prodiges, au point d’abuser, s’il était possible, même les élus. » Dans la seconde Lettre aux Thessaloniciens 2, 3 et ss. « . . . Auparavant doit venir l’apostasie et se révéler l’Homme impie, l’Etre perdu, l’Adversaire, celui qui s’élève au-dessus de tout ce qui porte le nom de Dieu ou reçoit un culte... Sa venue à lui, l’Impie, aura été marquée par l’influence de Satan, de toute espèce d’œuvres de puissance, de signes et de prodiges comme de toutes les tromperies du mal, à l’adresse de ceux qui sont voués à la perdition pour n’avoir pas accueilli l’amour de la vérité qui leur aurait valu d’être sauvés. Voilà pourquoi Dieu leur envoie une influence qui les égare, qui les pousse à croire le mensonge, en sorte que soient condamnés tous ceux qui auront refusé de croire la vérité et pris parti pour le mal. » Engels cite des passages de l’Ecriture comme le ferait le théologien le plus averti.

Il continue : « Nous ne pouvons plus adopter une attitude de froideur ou d’indifférence vis-à­vis du Seigneur. Non, c’est d’une inimitié ouverte et déclarée qu’il s’agit et au lieu de tant de sectes et partis nous n’avons plus, en définitive, que deux camps en présence : les chrétiens et les non-chrétiens... Nous voyons les faux prophètes à l’œuvre parmi nous... Ils parcourent l’Allemagne et cherchent à pénétrer partout pour propager leur doctrine satanique sur les places et faire flotter l’étendard de Satan de ville en ville, séduisant la jeunesse infortunée pour l’entraîner au plus profond des abîmes de l’enfer et de la mort. » Et il termine son livre par les paroles de l’Apocalypse « Voici que mon retour est proche. Veillez sur ce que vous possédez afin que personne ne puisse vous arracher votre récompense. Amen » (Marx-Engels, Historic critic complete édition I, cf. plus haut).

Ainsi cet homme qui a écrit de tels poèmes et de tels avertissements contre Satan, l’homme qui a versé des larmes pour demander à être préservé de ce danger, celui qui a avoué que Marx était « possédé de mille démons », ce même homme est bien devenu son plus proche collaborateur dans sa lutte diabolique pour abolir jusqu’au dernier vestige de religion et de morale (Le ma­nifeste communiste de Marx et Engels).

C’est la théologie libérale qui l’a conduit jusque-là, c’est elle qui partage avec Marx et Engels la responsabilité des dizaines de millions de vies innocentes tuées par le communisme.

Après ce triste intermède, long mais instructif au sujet d’Engels, revenons-en à Marx.

*

Rolf Bauer, dans son livre Genie und Reichtum, nous décrit la vie extravagante de Marx sous le rapport finances : « Quand il était étudiant à Berlin, vrai fils à papa, il recevait 700 thalers par an comme argent de poche. » C’était une somme considérable car à l’époque 5% seulement de la population avait un revenu supérieur à 300 thalers. Et au cours de sa vie Marx reçut de Engels l’équivalent de six millions de francs français (chiffres de l’Institut Marx-Engels).

Il ne cessait de convoiter des héritages. L’un de ses oncles étant à l’agonie, Marx écrit : « Si le chien meurt, cela me tirera bien d’embarras. » A quoi Engels lui répond : « Je me félicite pour vous de la maladie de l’obstacle à l’héritage et j’espère que l’événement fatal ne va pas tarder à se produire. »

Enfin « le chien » meurt. Lisons Marx le 8 mars 1855 : « Une excellente nouvelle ! Hier on nous a annoncé la mort à quatre-vingt-dix ans du vieil oncle de ma femme. Cette dernière va toucher cent livres sterling environ et même davantage à moins que le vieux chien n’ait laissé une part de son argent à la dame qui tenait son ménage. »

Il n’avait pas des sentiments plus tendres à l’égard de personnes qui lui étaient cependant bien plus proches que cet oncle. Il était fâché avec sa mère. En décembre 1863 il écrit à Engels : « Voici deux heures, un télégramme m’annonçait que ma mère vient de mourir. Il fallait que le destin enlève encore un membre de ma famille. J’avais moi-même déjà un pied dans la tombe, mais dans les circonstances présentes ma santé est plus utile que celle de la vieille femme. Je dois aller à Trèves au sujet de l’héritage. »… C’est là tout ce qu’il trouve à dire pour la mort de sa mère.

Tout économiste qu’il fût, Marx perdait tout le temps - et de fortes sommes - à la bourse.

Comme la secte de Satan est extrêmement secrète nous ne connaissons qu’à travers des allusions - souvent à mots couverts - les rapports supposés de Marx avec elle. Sa vie de désordres n’est-elle pas un anneau de plus dans la chaîne d’éléments que nous venons d’invoquer en faveur de cette hypothèse ?

C’était un intellectuel de grande classe. Engels aussi. Et pourtant leur correspondance est émaillée de propos obscènes inusités dans ce rang social. Les grossièretés y abondent, mais nulle part ces idéalistes ne mentionnent leur rêve humaniste ou socialiste.

Tout le comportement et la conversation de Marx étaient de nature sataniques. Juif lui-même, il n’hésita pourtant pas à publier un livre antisémite : La question juive. Et il ne détestait pas que les Juifs. Son ami Weitling relate : « Le sujet de conversation habituel de Marx est l’athéisme, la guillotine, des histoires sur Hegel, des récits de corde ou de poignard. » Il n’aimait pas non plus les Allemands : « La seule façon de les réveiller, prétendait-il, est de les rouer de coups. » Et il parlait du « stupide peuple allemand ». Et encore : « Les Allemands, les Chinois et les Juifs peuvent être comparés à des colporteurs et à de petits marchands. » Il évoquait « la mesquinerie rebutante et nationale des Allemands » (Kunzli, Psychogram).

Il considérait les Russes comme des infra-humains (K. Marx sur la Russie, Publishing House Zaria - Canada, en russe). « Les peuples slaves sont des rebuts ethniques » (cité dans le New York Times du 25 juin 1963).

Nous venons de passer successivement en revue plusieurs aspects qui pourraient nous amener à conclure que Marx était vraiment un adepte de Satan, un homme voué au démon. Mais poursuivons.

L’enfant préférée de Marx était Eleanor. Il l’appelait Tussy et disait souvent : « Tussy, c’est tout mon portrait. » Voyons ce que Tussy de son côté peut nous apprendre.

Avec le consentement de son père, Eleanor épouse Edward Aveling, ami de Mme Besant, un nom dans la théosophie. Edward faisait des conférences sur des sujets comme la perversité de Dieu (tout à fait la pensée satanique ! on ne nie pas l’existence de Dieu comme les athées - sauf pour donner volontairement le change. On reconnaît au contraire que Dieu existe, mais en le qualifiant de pervers et de mauvais). Dans ses conférences, Edward essayait de démontrer que « Dieu est favorable à la polygamie et qu’il encourage le vol. » Il soutenait le droit au blasphème (The life of Eleanor Marx, par Chushichi Tsuzuki, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967).

Bornons-nous à écouter le poème théosophique suivant en nous rappelant que le gendre préféré de Marx était l’un des principaux conférenciers du mouvement. Des écrits de ce genre étaient en faveur au foyer et l’on aura ainsi une idée du climat spirituel que l’on y respirait :

« Vers toi mes vers effrénés et audacieux
Monteront, ô Satan, roi du banquet.
Foin de tes aspersions, ô prêtre, et de tes psal­modies,
Car jamais, ô prêtre, Satan ne se tiendra derrière toi.Ton souffle, ô Satan, inspire mes vers
Quand du tréfonds de moi-même je défie les dieux.
A bas pontifes rois, à bas rois inhumains ;
Tien est l’éclair qui fait trembler les esprits.
O âme qui erres loin de la voie droite,
Satan est miséricordieux. Vois Héloïse.
Telle la trombe qui étend ses ailes,
Il passe, ô peuple, Satan le grand !
Salut, grand défenseur de la raison !
Vers toi monteront l’encens sacré et les vœux :
Tu as détrôné le dieu du prêtre. »

cité dans : The Prince of Darkness par F. Tatford - Bible and Advent Testimony movement).

Le lien entre le marxisme et la théosophie n’est pas accidentel. La théosophie a répandu en Occident la doctrine hindoue de l’inexistence de l’âme individuelle. Ce que la théosophie réussit par la persuasion, le marxisme le fait à coups de fouet : il dépersonnalise les hommes et les transforme en robots esclaves de l’Etat.

*

Encore un fait intéressant à noter. Jacob Auguste Riis avait été disciple de Marx. Désolé en apprenant sa mort, il se rendit à Londres pour visiter la maison où avait vécu le maître admiré. La famille avait déménagé. La seule personne qu’il put interroger était son ancienne femme de chambre. Elle lui dit à son sujet ces paroles étonnantes : « C’était un homme craignant Dieu. Quand il était bien malade il priait seul dans sa chambre devant une rangée de cierges allumés - le front ceint d’une sorte de mètre en ruban. » Cela fait penser aux phylactères, talismans portés par les juifs orthodoxes pour la prière du matin. Or, baptisé dans la religion chrétienne, Marx n’avait jamais pratiqué le judaïsme. Devenu ennemi acharné de Dieu, il avait écrit des livres contre la religion et élevé tous ses enfants dans l’athéisme. Quel était au juste ce rite que la servante, dans son ignorance, prenait pour une prière ? Quand les juifs prient, phylactères au front, ils n’ont jamais une rangée de cierges devant eux. S’agirait-il d’une pratique magique ? (Les manuscrits de M. Rus sont à la Bibliothèque Russel Sage. Voir Jacob Riis revisi-ted, Doubleday, 1968)

On trouve un autre indice en faveur de cette hypothèse dans une lettre écrite à Marx par son fils Edgar le 31 mars 1854 (M. E. Briefwechsel, II Vol. M. E. Lenin Institute, Moscou p. 18) Elle commence par ces mots renversants : « Mon cher diable » ! A-t-on jamais entendu un fils s’adresser à son père en ces termes ? C’est pourtant bien ainsi qu’un adepte de Satan écrit à un ami. Le fils aurait-il donc été initié lui aussi ?

Certains biographes de Marx ont bien eu l’intuition des rapports entre le « héros » de leur livre et le culte du diable, mais, mal préparés spirituellement, ils ne pouvaient comprendre ce dont il s’agissait. Leur témoignage n’est pas pour autant dépourvu d’intérêt.

Le marxiste Franz Mehring écrit dans son livre : Karl Marx (G. Allen & Unwin Ltd, Lon-dres 1936) : « Bien que le père de Karl Marx soit mort peu de jours après les vingt ans de son fils, il paraît avoir décelé avec une secrète appréhension la présence du démon en son fils préféré... Henri Marx ne prévoyait pas - comment l’aurait-il pu ? - que le riche bagage de culture bourgeoise dont il avait doté son enfant comme d’un héritage de prix ne servirait qu’à ouvrir une nouvelle carrière au démon, dont il avait une crainte profonde. »

Marx mourut en désespéré comme d’ailleurs tous les adeptes de Satan. Le 25 mai 1883 il écrit à Engels : « Oh que la vie est donc vaine et vide, mais en même temps combien désirable aussi ! »

*

Il y a derrière le marxisme un secret connu seulement d’un très petit nombre de ses adhérents. Lénine a même pu écrire : « Un demi-siècle après lui, pas un seul marxiste ne peut se vanter d’avoir vraiment compris Marx » (Cité dans Hegel par M. Kaufman, Doubleday 1965).

3SOUS LE MASQUE DE L’ATHÉISME

J’écris tout ceci au hasard de mes découvertes. Les penseurs chrétiens, comme d’ailleurs tout être humain, succombent souvent à la tentation de prouver mordicus quelque idée préconçue. Ils ne se contentent généralement pas en ce cas de présenter la vérité qu’ils connaissent ils ont tendance à multiplier à outrance les arguments en faveur de la thèse qu’ils soutiennent.

En ce qui me concerne personnellement, je ne prétends pas apporter la preuve irréfutable de l’appartenance de Marx à une secte d’adorateurs de Satan, mais je crois qu’il y a suffisamment d’indices pour le laisser supposer. Ou, du moins, pour déceler une influence certaine du démon sur sa vie et sa doctrine, tout en admettant bien qu’il manque encore des anneaux à la chaîne d’éléments qui permettraient de vérifier l’hypothèse. J’ai ouvert le feu : à d’autres, maintenant, de poursuivre cette enquête importante sur la rela-tion entre marxisme et satanisme.

Je ne puis moi-même entreprendre ce travail, en premier lieu surtout parce que mon temps est pris au sein de l’organisation Action chrétienne pour l’Eglise du Silence dont le but est de venir en aide aux victimes innocentes de la persécution satanique sous domination communiste. En second lieu, je ne suis pas le saint qu’il faudrait pour creuser davantage un tel sujet. Je me suis contenté de pénétrer aussi avant que j’ai pu dans les arcanes du culte diabolique.

Au cours de la cérémonie d’initiation au troisième degré il faut faire le serment suivant : « En tout et pour tout je ne ferai jamais que ce qui me plaît. » C’est là refuser sciemment le commandement de Dieu : « Ne suivez plus les désirs de vos cœurs et de vos yeux qui vous ont conduits à vous prostituer » (Nombres 15,39). Le culte de Satan est très ancien, plus vieux que le christia-nisme. Peut-être le prophète Isaïe y faisait allusion quand il disait : « Tous comme des brebis nous étions errants, chacun suivant son propre chemin et Yahvé a fait retomber sur Lui (le Sauveur) les crimes de nous tous » (Isaïe 53,6).

Lorsqu’un homme ou une femme sont admis au septième degré, ils jurent que leur ligne de conduite sera : « Rien n’est vrai, tout est permis. » Cela m’a rappelé que Marx, remplissant un questionnaire pour sa fille, répondait à la question « Quel est votre principe favori ? » par ces mots : « Le doute en toutes choses. » Je me suis également souvenu de ce qu’il écrivait dans le Manifeste communiste, à savoir, que son but était d’abolir non seulement toute religion mais aussi toute morale, ce qui rendrait tout permis.

Lors des événements de mai 68, j’ai été bou-leversé en lisant sur un placard, à l’Université de Paris, le mystère même du septième degré du satanisme synthétisé dans cette formule lapidaire : « Il est interdit d’interdire », conséquence logique du « rien n’est vrai, tout est permis ». Les jeunes n’ont certainement pas réalisé tout le ridicule de cette affirmation ! En effet, s’il est « interdit d’interdire », l’est tout autant le fait même d’interdire cela ! Si « tout est permis », comment serait-il défendu d’interdire ? Pour ces étudiants, permissivité et liberté allaient de pair. Mais les marxistes vont plus loin. Pour eux « tout est permis » équivaut à dire qu’il est interdit d’interdire la vieille et cruelle dictature du modèle Chine Rouge et Union Soviétique.

Je suis moi-même porté par nature à dominer. En étudiant les grands personnages de l’histoire qui ont choisi de se livrer totalement à l’influence tyrannique de Satan, j’ai senti ces tendances mauvaises se développer en moi. Aussi plutôt que de mettre en danger le joyau le plus précieux qui m’appartienne, mon âme, j’ai pris la décision de ne pas pousser plus avant mes investigations, même si leur but, hautement moral, est de mettre en lumière les ressorts du Mal.

Satan est un archange déchu, mais il a gardé son intelligence d’archange. Nous autres, hommes, nous ne pouvons pas nous mesurer avec lui, et j’ai compris ce conseil de sagesse donné par une Prieure de Carmélites : « Envoyez donc le diable... au diable, au lieu de chercher à pénétrer ses secrets ! »

J’ai eu véritablement la nausée à la découverte des arcanes immondes du satanisme, et j’ai laissé tomber toute recherche en ce sens. J’ai pensé aux paroles de Douglas Hunt dans son livre Researches in the sphere of the occult : « Il faut absolument mettre tout le monde en garde contre quelque participation que ce soit à la magie noire vraie ou fausse. Ne touchez pas à ces choses et évitez comme la peste tous ceux qui y sont engagés. Même si tout est truqué - comme c’est souvent le cas - ce sont cependant des choses rebutantes et bestiales, quand bien même le caractère en est parfois puéril. Cela ne mène qu’à la dégradation et à la décomposition de l’âme. Quand il s’agit de pouvoirs réels (comme, je le note, pour le marxisme) les conséquences n’en sont pas moins terriblement funestes pour les participants. »

Le communisme est une possession démoniaque collective. Soljenitsyne dans L’Archipel du Goulag nous donne précisément une idée de ces résultats désastreux pour l’âme et la vie des êtres.

J’ai bien conscience que les arguments que j’apporte ici sont des preuves indirectes. Encore une foi, le problème devra être étudié plus à fond par quelqu’un d’autre. Mais ce que j’ai écrit suffit à démontrer, me semble-t-il, que ce que les marxistes disent de Marx n’est qu’un simple mythe. Il n’était pas frappé de la pauvreté du prolétariat pour qui la révolution était la seule solution, il n’aimait pas les prolétaires qu’il appelait des « cinglés ».

Il n’aimait pas non plus ses camarades de combat pour le communisme. Il appelait Freiligrath « le cochon », Lassalle « le juif nègre », le camarade Liebknecht « la vache » et Bakounine « un triple zéro ».

Un militant de la Révolution de 1848, le lieutenant Tchechov, qui passait à boire avec Marx des nuits entières, disait que son ambition personnelle avait fait disparaître en lui jusqu’au dernier vestige de bien.

Et enfin il n’aimait pas davantage l’humanité. Mazzini, qui le connaissait bien, déclarait : « Il a l’esprit destructeur et son cœur déborde plus de haine que d’amour pour les hommes » (Toutes ces citations sont tirées de Karl Marx, par Fritz Raddatz, édité par la Maison Hoffman & Campe, Allemagne, 1975).

A ma connaissance, aucun témoignage de la part de ses contemporains ne contredit ce qui précède. « Marx, l’homme plein d’amour pour l’humanité », n’est qu’un mythe élaboré seulement après sa mort.

Il ne détestait pas la religion parce qu’elle fait obstacle au bonheur des hommes ; il souhaitait au contraire rendre l’humanité malheureuse pour le temps et pour l’éternité. Il proclamait que c’était là son idéal. Son vrai but était la destruction de la religion. Le socialisme, le souci du prolétariat, l’humanisme sont autant de prétextes fallacieux.

Venant de lire L’origine des espèces par voie de sélection naturelle de Darwin, il prend la plume pour écrire à Lassalle une lettre dans laquelle il exulte parce que Dieu - du moins dans les sciences naturelles - avait reçu « le coup de grâce. » (Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, par G. de Beer, Oxford University Press, 1974). Qu’est-ce donc qui en réalité prédominait dans son esprit ? Le souci de secourir le prolétariat dans la misère ? Comment la théorie de Darwin pouvait-elle y contribuer en bien ou en mal ? Son but primordial n’était-il pas plutôt de démolir la religion ?

Le bien des travailleurs n’était qu’un prétexte.

Partout où les prolétaires ne luttent pas pour leur idéal socialiste, les marxistes exploiteront les différences raciales ou les conflits de générations. L’important pour eux, c’est que la religion soit détruite.

*

Marx croyait à l’enfer et son programme consistait à y acheminer les hommes. Il serait intéressant sur ce point de noter dans sa biographie que Boukharine - secrétaire général de l’Internationale communiste et l’un des principaux doctrinaires marxistes du siècle - avait eu, dès l’âge de douze ans, après une lecture de l’Apocalypse, un désir irrésistible de devenir l’Antichrist. Ayant réalisé que d’après l’Ecriture ce dernier devait être le fils de la grande prostituée apocalyptique, il insistait auprès de sa mère pour qu’elle lui avoue s’être livrée à la prostitution (Georges Katkov, The trial of Bukharin, Stein and Day, N. Y. 1969).

Ce même Boukharine, qui s’y connaissait en la matière, disait de Staline que « ce n’était pas un homme, mais un démon ». Précisément le premier pseudonyme choisi par Staline dans ses écrits était Demonoshvili - ce qui est à peu près l’équivalent de l’émule du démon en géorgien (Grani N° 90-4) et Besoshvili - le démoniaque (A. Avtorhanov - The provenience of Partocraty Posev, Allemagne)

Mao déclare : « Dès l’âge de huit ans, j’ai haï Confucius. Il avait son temple dans notre village et de tout mon cœur je ne désirais qu’une chose, sa destruction de fond en comble » (Mao Tsé Toung par M. Zach, Berchtel édit. Allemagne).

Avez-vous souvent rencontré un enfant de cet âge ne désirant ainsi pas autre chose que l’anéantissement de sa propre religion ? Des pensées de ce genre ne peuvent venir que d’êtres possédés du démon.

Soljenitsyne, également dans L’Archipel du Goulag, raconte que Yagoda, ministre des Affaires intérieures en Union Soviétique, avait comme occupation favorite de tirer sur des images de Jésus et des saints. Encore un rite satanique pratiqué dans les hauts degrés de la hiérarchie communiste. Comment explique-t-on que les hommes représentant le prolétariat aient pris pour cible l’image de Jésus, un ouvrier, ou celle de la Vierge Marie, une femme du peuple ?

Des Pentecôtistes relatent un cas survenu en Russie au cours de la seconde guerre mondiale. Un de leurs prédicateurs avait exorcisé un démon. Ce dernier, avant de quitter le possédé, menaça de se venger. Or le prédicateur pentecôtiste en question fut fusillé pour la foi. L’officier qui l’exécuta dit auparavant : « Et maintenant, nous voilà quittes ! »... Des agents du communisme sont-ils donc parfois possédés du démon et servent-ils alors d’instruments de vengeance sur les chrétiens qui, eux, font tout pour renverser Satan de son trône ?

En Russie, le docteur Profirevitch avait une fille qu’il avait élevée dans la foi, mais elle dut fréquenter les écoles communistes. A douze ans, elle revint chez elle et déclara à ses parents : « La religion est une superstition des capitalistes. C’est complètement dépassé à notre époque ! Elle abandonna tout à fait le christianisme et s’engagea plus tard dans le Parti communiste où elle devint agent de la police secrète. Pour les parents, le choc fut terrible.

Dans la suite, on vint arrêter sa mère. C’est que, dans le communisme, personne ne possède rien en propre, pas même ses enfants, ni sa femme, ni sa liberté. L’Etat peut les prendre s’il le désire.

A l’arrestation de sa mère, le fils pleura beaucoup. Un an après, il se pendait. Le docteur Profirevitch trouva une lettre à son adresse : « Père, me condamnerez-vous ? Je suis membre de l’organisation de la Jeunesse Communiste. J’ai dû signer que je rapporterais tout ce qui serait contre les autorités soviétiques. Un jour j’ai été convoqué par la police et ma sœur Varia me demanda de signer une dénonciation contre ma mère parce qu’elle était chrétienne. Elle était considérée comme contre-révolutionnaire. Je signai... Je suis coupable de son emprisonnement. On m’ordonne maintenant de vous épier... Cela aboutirait au même résultat. Pardonnez-moi, Père, mais j’ai pris la décision de me supprimer. » Le suicide du fils eut pour conséquence l’incarcération du père » (Russkaia Misl, Paris, 13 mars 1975).

Au cours d’une grève organisée par les communistes français en 1974 les ouvriers étaient invités à défiler dans les rues de Paris en scandant ce slogan :

« Giscard d’Estaing est foutu,
Les démons sont dans la rue ! »

Pourquoi nommément « les démons », plutôt que « les travailleurs » ou « le peuple » ? Pourquoi cette évocation des puissances sataniques ? Qu’ont-elles affaire avec les revendications légitimes de la classe ouvrière pour des salaires plus élevés ?

Je puis comprendre à la rigueur que des communistes aient arrêté des prêtres et des pasteurs sous prétexte qu’ils étaient contre-révolutionnaires. Mais comment expliquer que des prêtres aient été forcés par des marxistes à dire la messe sur des excréments et de l’urine dans les prisons roumaines de Piteshti ? Pourquoi des moqueries obscènes sur la religion ? (I Cirja Retour de l’Enfer et D. Bacu : Piteshti). Pourquoi le prêtre orthodoxe roumain Roman Braga (son adresse actuelle est : Romanian Orthodox Bishopric, Jacksonville, Michigan, U.S.A), quand il était prisonnier des communistes, s’est-il vu briser les dents une à une à coups de barre de fer pour l’obliger à blasphémer ? Les communistes avaient expliqué - à lui et aux autres : « Si nous vous tuons, vous autres chrétiens, vous irez au ciel. Mais nous ne voulons pas que vous receviez la palme du martyre ! Il faut que vous maudissiez Dieu et que vous alliez en enfer ! » Les marxistes sont soi-disant des athées qui ne croient ni à dieu ni à diable. Dans ces cas extrêmes le marxisme a simplement ôté son masque d’athéisme pour montrer son vrai visage, celui de Satan.

La persécution de la religion par les communistes peut s’expliquer humainement, mais la fureur dont elle s’accompagne au-delà de toute raison est, selon toute évidence, d’origine satanique.

Vetchernaia Moskva, journal communiste, a vendu la mèche : « Nous ne combattons pas directement les croyants, ni même les prêtres. Nous luttons contre Dieu pour lui arracher ses fidèles » (Cité par le prêtre Dudko dans « O nachem oupavaü », YMCA Press, Paris).

Le journal soviétique Sovietskaia Molodioj du 14 février 1976 raconte comment sous le régime du tsar les communistes russes entraient dans les églises pour se moquer de Dieu. Voici leur « Notre Père » blasphématoire et satanique :

« Notre Père qui êtes à Pétersbourg
Que votre nom soit maudit,
Que votre règne s’effondre,
Que votre volonté ne soit pas accomplie, pas même en enfer.
Donnez-nous notre pain que vous nous avez volé,
Et payez nos dettes, comme nous avons payé les vôtres jusqu’à maintenant.
Et ne nous induisez plus en tentation,
Mais délivrez-nous du mal, la police de Plehve (le Premier ministre du tsar),
Et anéantissez son maudit gouvernement.
Mais comme vous êtes faible et pauvre en esprit, en pouvoir et en autorité,
Que c’en soit fini de vous pour l’éternité.Amen. »

Si l’on veut en savoir davantage sur les rapports du marxisme et des sciences occultes, on peut se référer à l’ouvrage de Cheila Ostrander et Lynn Chröder Psychic discoveries behind the Iron Curtain, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice Hall, 1970. On y découvrira avec stupéfaction que les pays de l’Est communiste sont beaucoup plus avancés que ceux de l’Occident dans la recherche de toutes les forces occultes manœuvrées par Satan.

Le docteur Edouard Naumov, membre de l’Association internationale des parapsychologues, a été arrêté à Moscou.

Le physicien moscovite L. Regelsohn, juif converti au christianisme, qui prit sa défense, nous apprend le motif de son arrestation : la tentative, de la part de Naumov, de maintenir le domaine de la vie psychique libre de toute domination absolue par les forces mauvaises qui ne s’intéressaient à cette science, en fin de compte, que parce qu’elles y voyaient un nouvel instrument d’oppression de la personnalité humaine.

En Tchécoslovaquie, en Bulgarie, etc., le Parti communiste investit des sommes énormes à des recherches secrètes en métapsychique. Il en existe vingt Instituts en Union Soviétique, mais un rideau de fer hermétique empêche l’Occident d’avoir la moindre idée de ce qui s’y passe (Novoie Russkoie Slovo, 30 juillet 1975).

*

Quelle a été, au juste, la contribution de Marx au plan de Satan sur l’humanité ? Une contribution importante, peut-on affirmer.

La Bible nous enseigne que Dieu a créé l’homme à son image (Genèse 1,26). Jusqu’à l’apparition de Marx, l’homme avait toujours été considéré comme l’achèvement, le sommet de la création. Mais Marx a servi d’instrument de choix à Satan en faisant perdre à l’homme, en même temps que sa propre estime, la conviction qu’il est issu d’un passé glorieux auquel il doit revenir un jour. Le marxisme est la première philosophie systématique et détaillée qui rabaisse brutalement la notion d’homme. Selon son auteur, l’homme est essentiellement un ventre affamé qu’il faut satisfaire continuellement. Ses intérêts suprêmes sont d’ordre économique. Il produit en fonction de ses besoins et pour cela il entre en relation avec d’autres hommes. Telle est la base de la société que Marx qualifie d’infrastructure. Le mariage, l’amour, l’art, la science, la religion, la philosophie - tout ce qui n’est pas, précisément, satisfaction du ventre, sont des superstructures déterminées, en dernière analyse, par l’état du ventre.

Comment s’étonner dès lors que Marx se soit grandement réjoui à la lecture du livre de Darwin qui a été, à sa façon, un coup de maître pour faire oublier à l’homme son origine et sa fin divines. Il prétend, en effet, que l’homme descend du singe et n’a d’autre but que sa simple survie.

Le roi de la nature a été ainsi habilement détrôné par ces deux hommes. Ne pouvant directement s’attaquer à Dieu, Satan a dévalué l’homme à ses propres yeux en le rabaissant à la condition d’esclave de ses instincts et de progéniture d’animaux.

Plus tard Freud allait compléter le travail de ces deux géants du satanisme en réduisant l’homme fondamentalement à l’instinct sexuel, instinct parfois sublimé en politique, en art et en religion. Ce fut le psychologue suisse Jung qui revint à la doctrine de la Bible selon laquelle l’instinct religieux est fondamental chez l’homme.

4LE CATÉCHISME ROUGE

Pour achever le tableau, un mot encore sur Moses Hess, l’homme qui a converti Marx et Engels à l’idée socialiste. Il y a en Israël une tombe sur laquelle on peut lire : « Moses Hess, fondateur du parti social-démocrate allemand. »

Dans son Catéchisme rouge pour le peuple allemand (Catéchismes politiques édités par K. M. Michel, Insel Publ. Allemagne 1966), il écrivait : « Qu’est-ce qui est noir ? - Noir est le clergé ! ... Ces théologiens sont les pires des aristocrates. Le prêtre, en effet, enseigne premièrement aux princes à opprimer le peuple au nom de Dieu ; deuxièmement, il apprend au peuple à se laisser brimer et exploiter au nom de Dieu. Troisièmement enfin, et surtout, il se procure à lui-même, avec l’idée de Dieu, une vie confortable sur terre, tout en conseillant au peuple d’attendre le ciel... »

« Le drapeau rouge est le symbole de la révolution permanente jusqu’à la victoire définitive des classes laborieuses dans tous les pays civilisés, autrement dit, la République Rouge... La révolution socialiste est ma religion... Les travailleurs, quand ils auront conquis un pays, devront aller aider leurs frères dans le reste du monde. »

Telle était la religion de Hess au moment où il publiait son Catéchisme. Mais, dans sa seconde édition, il y ajoute quelques chapitres cette fois, la même religion - la révolution socialiste - emploie un langage chrétien pour avoir crédit auprès des croyants. On y trouve, en même temps qu’une propagande en faveur de la révolution, quelques mots aimables en faveur du christianisme, religion d’amour et d’humanisme. Mais il convient de rendre son message plus clair : son enfer ne doit pas être sur terre ni son ciel au-delà. La société socialiste sera l’accomplissement véritable du christianisme. C’est ainsi que Satan se déguise en ange de lumière.

Après avoir convaincu Marx et Engels de l’idéal socialiste en ne cachant pas, dès le départ, que son but était « de donner le coup de grâce à la religion du Moyen Age » - (son ami Jung le dit plutôt clairement : « Marx réussira sûrement à chasser Dieu de son ciel ») - il se produisit un événement intéressant dans la vie de Hess. Cet homme qui avait fondé le socialisme moderne devint également le promoteur d’un mouvement totalement différent une forme particulière de sionisme.

Personnellement, je suis partisan du sionisme. L’Etat d’Israël appartient aux juifs de droit divin. Dieu, créateur de la terre, a dit et répété par les prophètes qu’il avait donné la terre de Palestine aux Juifs. Mais cela ne veut pas dire pour autant que je souscrive indistinctement à tout ce que les sionistes ont pu penser.

De même, je suis chrétien, mais cela ne veut pas non plus dire pour autant que j’approuve tout ce qu’enseignent et font les chrétiens. Ce serait d’ailleurs impossible car les chrétiens sont divisés entre eux et professent des choses contradictoires. Il en va de même en ce qui concerne les sionistes, il en existe plus d’une sorte : il y a un sionisme socialiste, un sionisme judaïque religieux et un sionisme de chrétiens juifs, un sionisme pacifique et un autre, agressif. Il y a même un sionisme meurtrier et terroriste - celui du groupe Stern, par exemple, qui a causé la mort de bien des innocents.

Et au sein du christianisme, il y a ce qui vient de Dieu, ce que les hommes y ont ajouté, mais il y a également l’influence du diable. Jésus lui-même n’a-t-Il pas dit à l’un de ses apôtres qu’il était un démon ?

Le sionisme est, lui aussi, un mélange. Tout en étant l’accomplissement d’un plan divin, c’est en même temps un mouvement humain - avec tous les risques que comportent faiblesses et péchés. Il y a eu même une tentative d’instaurer un type de sionisme satanique qui, fort heureusement, a avorté. En effet Herzl a donné au sionisme une tournure raisonnable et dans sa forme moderne il n’y subsiste aucune trace de satanisme.

Hess, le fondateur du socialisme moderne dont le but, nous venons de le rappeler, est de chasser Dieu de son ciel, a été, à son heure, promoteur d’un type diabolique de sionisme destiné à démolir le pieux sionisme, celui de l’amour, de l’entente et de la concorde avec les pays voisins.

Cet homme qui avait appris à Marx l’importance de la lutte des classes, écrivait en 1862 ces mots - qui nous étonnent sous sa plume : « La lutte des races est prioritaire ; celle des classes ne vient qu’en second » (M. Hess, Rome and Jerusalem, Philosophical Library, New York). C’est lui qui, pour la lutte des classes, attisa un feu inextinguible au lieu de montrer aux classes sociales comment coopérer au bien commun.

C’est donc ainsi que ce même Hess devint l’instigateur d’une déviation du sionisme - sionisme à caractère racial, imposant la lutte contre ceux qui ne sont pas de race juive. De même que nous rejetons le marxisme satanique, de même tout juif ou chrétien qui se respecte doit-il écarter cette contrefaçon démoniaque du sionisme.

Hess revendique bien Jérusalem pour les Juifs, mais « sans Jésus, le Roi des juifs ». On n’a que faire de Jésus ! « Tout Juif, en effet, ne porte-t-il pas en lui l’étoffe d’un messie et toute Juive, celle d’une Mater Dolorosa ? » Pourquoi, dès lors, n’a-t-il pas fait du Juif qu’était Marx un messie, un oint de Dieu au lieu d’un être entièrement tendu dans son effort plein de haine pour expulser Dieu du ciel ? Pour Hess, Jésus est un Juif que les païens ont déifié comme leur Sauveur. Ni lui ni les Juifs ne semblent avoir besoin de Lui comme Sauveur personnel.

Il ne souhaite pas être sauvé et prétend que la recherche individuelle de la sainteté est de nature indo-germanique. L’idéal des Juifs, selon lui, doit être un « état messianique » pour rendre le monde conforme au plan divin, ce qui équivaut - comme il le reconnaît d’ailleurs lui-même dans son Catéchisme Rouge - à faire la révolution socialiste en se servant pour cela de la lutte raciale et de la lutte des classes.

Moses Hess, qui assignait à Marx, son idole, la tâche de mettre un terme à la religion du Moyen Age et de lui substituer la religion de la révolution socialiste, écrit ces mots qui de sa part sont assez surprenants : « J’ai toujours été édifié par les prières hébraïques. » Quelles prières disent donc ceux qui considèrent la religion comme l’opium du peuple ? Nous avons déjà vu que le fondateur de l’athéisme priait devant des cierges allumés et qu’il portait des phylactères. C’est que les prières juives, à l’instar des prières chrétiennes, peuvent être utilisées à des fins blasphématoires dans le rituel de Satan.

Hess avait inculqué à Marx un socialisme indissolublement lié à l’internationalisme. Et Marx note bien dans son Manifeste communiste que le prolétariat ne connaît pas de frontières. Quant à Hess, dans son Catéchisme rouge, il ne manque pas de railler le chauvinisme des Allemands.

Il en aurait d’ailleurs fait autant avec la notion de patrie de n’importe quelle autre nation d’Europe. Il critiquait le programme d’Erfurt du Parti social-démocrate allemand à cause de sa reconnaissance inconditionnelle du principe national. Mais c’est un internationaliste d’exception car pour lui le patriotisme juif doit demeurer. Il écrit : « Celui qui renie le nationalisme juif est un apostat, un renégat - au sens religieux - c’est aussi un traître à son peuple et à sa famille. S’il devait être établi que l’émancipation des Juifs est incompatible avec le nationalisme juif, les Juifs devraient sans la moindre hésitation sacrifier leur émancipation. »... « Les Juifs doivent, avant tout, être patriotes. »

Pour ma part je suis d’accord avec les idées patriotiques de Hess dans la mesure où elles sont valables pour tous. Je suis partisan en effet de tout patriotisme, qu’il s’agisse des Juifs, des Arabes, des Allemands, des Français, des Américains. C’est une vertu s’il implique la préoccupation d’assurer le bonheur d’une nation au niveau économique, politique, spirituel et religieux, à condition bien entendu que ce soit dans l’amitié et la coopération avec d’autres nations.

En revanche le patriotisme juif du socialiste révolutionnaire qui rejette celui de tous les autres pays me paraît extrêmement suspect : c’est comme un plan diabolique pour faire haïr les Juifs de tous les autres peuples. Mais fort heureusement aucun Juif à ma connaissance n’a accepté ce plan de Satan.

La lutte raciale dont Hess s’est fait le protagoniste est aussi erronée que la lutte des classes dont il a été l’instigateur.

Il n’abandonna pas le socialisme pour s’orienter vers cette forme particulière de sionisme mais, après avoir écrit Rome et Jérusalem il poursuivit son activité au sein du mouvement socialiste mondial.

Il n’exprime pas clairement ses pensées, aussi est-il malaisé de les comprendre. Qu’il nous suffise de savoir que, d’après lui, « le monde chrétien voit en Jésus un saint Juif devenu païen. Nous autres aujourd’hui, prétend-il dans ce livre, nous aspirons à un salut beaucoup plus large que celui que le christianisme a jamais été capable de nous offrir ». Rappelons que, d’après le Catéchisme Rouge, ce salut beaucoup plus large n’est autre que la révolution socialiste.

Nous pourrions ajouter que Hess n’a pas été seulement la source originelle du marxisme et celui qui a tenté de créer un sionisme anti-Dieu, mais qu’il a été également le père de la théologie de la Révolution, thème d’actualité pour le Conseil Mondial des Eglises et aussi pour certaines tendances nouvelles du catholicisme selon lesquelles il est question d’un salut dès aujourd’hui. Par conséquent ce même et unique homme, demeuré presque inconnu, a été le porte-parole de trois mouvements d’origine satanique : le communisme, un détestable sionisme raciste et une prétendue théologie de la révolution.

Nul ne saurait être chrétien s’il n’aime les Juifs. Jésus était de race juive ; de même la Vierge Marie et tous les apôtres. Notre Bible est hébraïque et le Seigneur lui-même a déclaré : « Le salut vient des Juifs. » Au contraire Hess exalte les Juifs exactement comme s’il cherchait à susciter une violente réaction antisémite. Il a affirmé que sa religion n’était que la révolution socialiste et que le clergé de toutes les « autres » religions était fait d’escrocs. Oui, la révolution est bien l’unique religion pour laquelle Hess professe un grand respect. Il écrit : « Notre religion (le judaïsme) possède à son point de départ l’enthousiasme d’une race qui, dès son apparition sur la scène de l’histoire, a prévu l’objectif final de l’humanité et qui pressent les temps messianiques où l’esprit de cette humanité arrive à son accomplissement, non pas en tel ou tel individu en particulier, ni en partie seulement mais dans les Institutions sociales de l’humanité tout entière. » (Toutes les citations qui précèdent sont tirées des OEuvres choisies de Moses Hess, Berchtel édit., Allemagne). Ce temps que Hess programme « messianique » est celui de la victoire de la révolution socialiste mondiale. L’idée d’après laquelle la religion juive avait comme point de départ le concept d’une révolution socialiste athée n’est qu’une vilaine plaisanterie et une véritable insulte au peuple juif.

Tout en s’exprimant continuellement en termes religieux, Hess ne croit pas en Dieu. Il prétend que « notre dieu n’est autre que notre race humaine unie dans l’amour ». La voie qui mène à une telle union est la révolution socialiste où des dizaines de millions de membres de cette humanité bien-aimée seront torturés et mis à mort. Il ne cache pas, par ailleurs, qu’il n’accepte aucune domination du ciel ni des puissances de ce monde, car elles ont pour caractère commun l’oppression. Il n’y a de bien dans aucune religion excepté dans la révolution socialiste. « Il est absolument vain et inefficace d’élever le peuple jusqu’à la liberté authentique et de le faire participer aux biens de la vie, dit-il, si on ne le libère pas de l’esclavage spirituel, autrement dit, de la religion. » Dans la même ligne, il fait allusion à « l’absolutisme des tyrans célestes et terrestres sur leurs esclaves ».

Ce n’est qu’en comprenant bien Moses Hess - celui, qui influença à la fois Marx, Engels et Bakounine, les trois fondateurs de la Première Internationale (D. Mc Lellan, Marx before Marxism, Mc Millan), que nous serons à même de découvrir les racines sataniques du communisme.

Cette longue digression au sujet de Hess s’avérait donc nécessaire car si on ne le connaît pas, Marx demeure impénétrable puisqu’il a été en-traîné par lui au socialisme.

Répétons ici les paroles de Marx déjà citées plus haut :

« J’enseigne des mots enchevêtrés dans un embrouillamini diabolique, ainsi chacun peut croire vrai ce qu’il choisit de penser. »

C’est bien ainsi, effectivement, le style de Marx. Quant aux ouvrages de Hess, c’est un embrouillamini encore plus inextricable et diabolique, véritable labyrinthe où il est difficile de retrouver son chemin mais qu’il convient d’analyser pour déceler les liens possibles de Marx avec le satanisme.

Le premier livre de Hess s’intitule : Histoire sainte de l’humanité. C’était, selon lui, un ouvrage du saint esprit de vérité. Au jour du lancement, il notait dans son journal (folio 101) : « Le Fils de Dieu a libéré les hommes de leur esclavage personnel, Hess, à son tour, les libérera de l’asservissement politique. » Et encore : « Je suis appelé comme Jean-Baptiste à témoigner de la lumière. »

A cette époque, Marx, encore opposé au socialisme, ne connaissait pas Hess personnellement et il commença même un livre pour le réfuter. Mais, pour des raisons qui nous échappent, ce livre ne fut jamais achevé (MARX-ENGELS, OEu-vres complètes, Moscou, 1927-1935, Vol. 1). Il devint par la suite disciple de Hess.

Qui donc est ce Hess, ce soi-disant messager de l’Esprit Saint ? Nous avons déjà vu que son but avoué était de donner le coup de grâce à la religion et de causer des ravages. Dans l’introduction à son ouvrage Jugement dernier, il ne cache pas sa satisfaction de ce que le philosophe allemand Kant ait, prétend-il, « décapité le vieux Père Jéhovah ainsi que toute la sainte famille ». Hess fait passer ses propres idées sous le couvert du grand philosophe. Mais Kant n’avait pas de telles intentions ! Il a écrit, au contraire : « Je dois limiter ma connaissance pour laisser du terrain à ma foi. » Hess affirme que la religion juive est morte ainsi que la religion chrétienne (La Revue n° 1, p. 288), ce qui d’ailleurs ne l’empêche pas dans Rome et Jérusalem d’évoquer nos Saintes Ecritures, le saint langage de nos pères, notre culte et la loi divine, les voies de la Providence et la vie de sainteté...

Ce n’est pas qu’il ait changé d’opinion aux divers stades de sa vie. Il a déclaré lui-même en écrivant son livre pseudo-sioniste, qu’il ne désavoue en rien ses essais athées antérieurs (Nieder-rheinische Volks-Zeitung du 15-7-1862). Il s’agit là d’un embrouillamini diabolique volontaire.

Hess était juif et précurseur du sionisme. Et c’est précisément parce que avec Marx et d’autres, il était de race juive que certains pensent que le communisme est tramé par les Juifs. Mais ceux-là semblent oublier que Marx a écrit un livre antisémite, en disciple de son maître Hess même sur ce point. Ce sioniste qui élève le judaïsme jusqu’aux nues a dit dans son ouvrage Sur le système monétaire (Rheinische Jarbücher, Vol. 1, 18-45) : « Les Juifs qui, dans l’histoire naturelle et dans le monde de la société animale, avaient mission de développer l’humanité pour en faire un animal sauvage, se sont bien acquittés de cette tâche professionnelle. Le mystère du judaïsme et du christianisme a été révélé dans le judéo-chrétien moderne : le mystère du sang du Christ tel celui de l’antique culte juif du sang - apparaît ainsi dévoilé, et c’est le mystère de l’animal de proie. »

Peu importe si le sens de ces paroles demeure obscur pour vous : elles ont été « enchevêtrées dans un embrouillamini diabolique », mais toute la haine qu’elles renferment n’est que trop évidente. Pour les besoins de la cause Hess est tour à tour juif ou antisémite, selon l’esprit qu’il qualifie de saint et qui est l’inspirateur de ses écrits.

Il est possible que Hitler ait puisé son racisme chez Hess qui avait appris à Marx que l’appartenance à une classe sociale est le facteur décisif et qui affirmait aussi tout le contraire : « La vie est le produit immédiat de la race (Rome et Jéru-salem). Les institutions et conceptions tant sociales que religieuses sont des créations spécifiques et originales de la race. » « Le problème racial est en filigrane dans tous les problèmes de nationalités et de liberté. Toute l’histoire du passé a été une lutte entre classes et races. La lutte raciale vient en premier lieu, celle des classes, en second » (ibidem).

Comment Hess réussira-t-il à faire triompher toutes ses idées nombreuses et contradictoires ? « Je passerai au fil de l’épée tous les citoyens qui opposeront résistance aux efforts du prolétariat » (Lettre à Lassalle, Correspondance de Moses Hess, éd. Gravenhage, 1959). Marx nous dit la même chose en d’autres termes : « La violence est la sage-femme qui aide la nouvelle société à naître des entrailles de l’ancienne » (Le Capital).

*

Le tout premier maître de Marx fut le philosophe Hegel qui ne fit que frayer la route à Hess. Marx avait aussi pris de la graine chez Hegel. Pour ce penseur, le christianisme était pitoyable comparé au glorieux hellénisme. « Les chrétiens ont accumulé un tel monceau de bonnes raisons pour se réconforter dans le malheur qu’en définitive nous devrions être navrés de ne pas avoir la possibilité de perdre père ou mère une fois par semaine, alors que pour les Grecs le malheur était vraiment malheur et la douleur, douleur » (Citations de Mc Lellan, cf. ci-dessus).

Le christianisme n’avait pas attendu Hegel pour être raillé en Allemagne, mais Hegel a été le premier à se moquer de la Personne même de Jésus.

Nous sommes ce que la nourriture que nous prenons nous fait devenir. Marx, nourri d’idées sataniques, n’a pu que fabriquer une doctrine satanique.

5DE MARX AU MARXISTE DE LA BASE

D’ordinaire les communiste fondent des organisations déguisées. Tous les indices précités montrent que, selon toute probabilité, les mouvements communistes eux-mêmes sont des organisations déguisées d’un satanisme occulte. Cela expliquerait aussi que toutes les armes politiques, économiques, culturelles et militaires employées pour réduire le communisme se soient jusqu’ici avérées inefficaces. Les moyens de combattre le satanisme sont spirituels et non d’ordre matériel. Autrement, en écrasant une organisation comme le nazisme par exemple, on contribue du même coup à la plus grande victoire d’une autre organisation de choc de cette même famille occulte de Satan !

Himmler, ministre de l’Intérieur de l’Allemagne nazie, pensait qu’il était une réincarnation du Roi Henri l’Oiseleur. Il croyait possible de mettre les puissances occultes au service de l’armée nazie. Plusieurs des chefs nazis, en effet, trempaient dans la magie noire.

Des fondateurs aussi bien du communisme que du nazisme moderne ont été en relation avec des créatures surnaturelles douées d’intelligence, avec des anges déchus dépourvus de tout principe moral. Marx a reçu de leur part la mission avouée « de mettre par terre toute religion et toute morale ».

Toutefois le simple marxiste de la base est loin d’être animé du même esprit que Marx. Il aime l’humanité et croit s’être enrôlé dans une armée qui combat pour le bien de cette dernière. Il n’a nullement l’intention d’être le jouet d’une étrange secte satanique. Pour un tel marxiste ces lignes pourraient être éclairantes...

Quant au marxisme satanique, il a une philosophie matérialiste qui rend ses adeptes aveugles aux réalités spirituelles. Il y a cependant plus que la matière. Il existe tout un monde de l’esprit de vérité, de beauté et des idéaux de justice... Il existe également un monde d’esprits mauvais dont le chef est Satan. Il est tombé du ciel à cause de son orgueil et il a entraîné avec lui d’abord une multitude d’anges puis le premier couple humain. Depuis la chute, son message s’est perpétué et s’est accru au moyen de tous les artifices possibles. C’est ainsi que nous voyons la somptueuse création de Dieu ravagée par des guerres mondiales, des révolutions et contre-révolutions sanglantes, des dictatures, par l’exploitation de l’homme, les racismes de toutes sortes, les fausses religions, l’agnosticisme et l’athéisme, par les crimes et les escroqueries, les infidélités dans l’amour et l’amitié, les divorces, les enfants rebelles.

L’humanité a perdu la vision de Dieu.

Et qu’est-ce qui a remplacé cette vision ? Quelque chose de supérieur ? Une Commission anglicane d’enquête sur les Sciences occultes réunie en Australie a déposé son rapport le 13 août 1975. Il en ressort que la moitié des lycéens de Sydney ont trempé dans l’occultisme et le satanisme. Dans d’autres villes d’Australie, même constatation. La moitié de la jeunesse participe à la sorcellerie et aux messes noires. La situation n’est peut-être pas aussi tragique dans d’autres pays du monde libre ; mais de toutes façons l’intrusion du marxisme chez les jeunes va de pair avec celle du satanisme, même si les liens entre les deux ne sont pas toujours apparents.

Les créatures ont pu abandonner Dieu. Dieu, Lui, n’abandonne jamais ses créatures. Il a envoyé dans le monde Son Fils unique Jésus-Christ. Amour incarné et tout de compassion, Jésus a vécu sur terre comme enfant juif pauvre, comme un modeste charpentier, et enfin comme un maître de vie. Un homme foulé aux pieds, c’est bien évident, ne peut se relever tout seul, pas plus qu’un homme en train de se noyer ne peut sortir de l’eau sans aide. C’est pourquoi Jésus, pleinement compréhensif de nos conflits intérieurs, a pris sur Lui tous nos péchés - même ceux de Marx et de ses disciples - et Il a souffert la punition du mal que nous avons fait. Il a expié nos péchés en mourant sur la croix au Golgotha après avoir subi les pires humiliations.

Il nous a dit et promis : celui qui met sa foi en Lui est pardonné et vivra éternellement avec Lui dans le paradis.

Même des marxistes notoires peuvent recevoir le salut ! Il est intéressant de signaler que deux prix Nobel soviétiques - Pasternak et Soljenitsyne - après avoir consigné dans leurs écrits les extrémités criminelles auxquelles conduit le marxisme, ont confessé leur foi au Christ.

N’oublions pas que l’idéal de Marx était de descendre en personne aux abîmes de l’enfer et d’y entraîner avec lui l’humanité entière. Puissions-nous ne pas le suivre sur cette voie de perdition, mais bien plutôt mettre nos pas dans ceux du Christ, pour atteindre avec notre Sauveur des sommets de lumière, de sagesse, d’amour, et le ciel d’une gloire inénarrable.

CONCLUSION

Ma brochure en américain en est à sa deuxième édition, revue et augmentée.

La première a donné lieu à des réactions intéressantes. Beaucoup l’ont appréciée comme un pas en avant dans la connaissance de Marx et m’ont donné des pistes valables où je pourrai trouver d’autres matériaux de travail.

Plusieurs colonnes d’une revue hollandaise de théologie ont cherché à minimiser l’importance de cette recherche. « Bien dit l’auteur, il est fort possible que Marx ait trempé dans la magie noire, mais ceci, en définitive, importe peu. Tous les hommes, en effet, sont pécheurs ; tous les hommes ont de mauvaises pensées. Ne nous alarmons pas pour si peu. »

Oui, certes, tous les hommes sont pécheurs, mais tous ne sont pas pour autant criminels ! Oui, tous les hommes sont pécheurs mais parmi ces derniers, les uns sont criminels et les autres sont les juges rigides qui les font paraître en jugement. Les crimes du Communisme sont sans précédent. Quel autre système politique pourrait se vanter d’avoir mis à mort soixante millions d’hommes en un demi-siècle, comme c’est le cas pour les Soviets ? (Soljenitsyne, L’Archipel du Goulag, Seuil). Soixante autres millions ont été tués en Chine Rouge. Il y a des degrés dans le péché et la criminalité. Le comble du crime vient du comble d’influence satanique sur le fondateur du Communisme moderne. Les péchés du marxisme, comme ceux du nazisme, dépassent la mesure ordinaire. Ils sont démoniaques !

J’ai reçu des lettres d’adeptes de Satan faisant l’apologie de leur religion. L’un d’eux écrit : « Pour défendre ses positions, le satanisme peut se contenter de la Bible comme évidence documentaire. Pensez à ces milliers de gens de ce monde créés à l’image de Dieu et détruits, rappelez-vous, par le feu et le soufre (Sodome et Gomorrhe) ; à la série de plaies affreuses et, pour couronner le tout, à la noyade de toute la population de la terre, à l’exception de la famille de Noé. Toutes ces dévastations n’ont elles pas été causées par un Dieu « miséricordieux », le Seigneur Jéhovah ? Qu’est ce que cela aurait été s’il se fût agi d’un Dieu sans pitié ? »

« D’autre part, dans toute la Bible, on ne voit nulle part une seule mort causée par Satan !!! Donc, retenons cela en faveur de Satan ! »

Cet émule de Satan n’a probablement pas étudié la Bible de près. La mort, en effet, est venue dans le monde à cause de la tromperie de Satan qui a entraîné Eve au péché. Cet émule de Satan tire peut-être aussi trop vite ses conclusions, car Dieu n’a pas encore dit son dernier mot avec sa création...

Quand on le commence, tout tableau ressemble à un affreux mélange de points et de lignes de différentes couleurs et qui n’a aucun sens. Il a fallu vingt ans à Léonard de Vinci pour en faire jaillir son chef-d’œuvre, la Joconde. Dieu aussi prend son temps pour créer. Au moment voulu, il façonne les êtres, au moment voulu il les détruit pour leur donner une nouvelle forme. La graine qui n’a ni beauté ni parfum doit d’abord mourir à son état de graine pour devenir une fleur merveilleuse et embaumée. Les chenilles doivent disparaître pour que de la chrysalide sortent des papillons aux couleurs chatoyantes. De même Dieu permet-Il que les hommes passent par le feu purifiant de la souffrance et de la mort. Les cieux nouveaux et la terre nouvelle où la justice triomphera seront l’apothéose de la création.

Alors, ceux qui auront suivi Satan souffriront pendant une éternité de regrets. On se trompe lourdement en choisissant Satan !

Jésus a passé par la flagellation et la crucifixion. Mais qui désire connaître Dieu doit regarder au-delà de la tombe de Jésus sa résurrection et son ascension. Au contraire, les ennemis de Jésus qui ont comploté sa mort n’ont fait qu’apporter à leur peuple et à leur temple la destruction, et ils ont perdu leur âme.

Notre contestataire désirait saisir Dieu par sa raison, mais ce n’est pas le bon moyen pour une créature. On ne peut pas comprendre Dieu, mais seulement l’accueillir par le cœur dans la foi.

Un Jamaïquain me demande si l’Amérique, en train d’exploiter son pays, n’est pas adepte de Satan au même titre que Marx ! Non, elle ne l’est pas. Les Américains sont pécheurs comme tout le reste des mortels, il est vrai, mais le nom d’adeptes de Satan ne peut être donné qu’à ceux qui, consciemment, rendent au diable un culte d’adoration. Or, si l’Amérique compte un petit groupe de tels adeptes, la nation tout entière est loin d’avoir choisi Satan pour Dieu !

J’ai reçu en outre des lettres de marxistes. La plus remarquable de la plume d’un Nigérien, leader pendant vingt ans de l’union travailliste. Mes écrits l’ont aidé à voir qu’il avait été trompé par Satan. Il est devenu chrétien.

Je lance cette édition française de ma brochure avec l’espoir qu’elle pourra éclairer adeptes de Satan et marxistes dans leur recherche de Jésus.

Evidemment il est impossible d’établir une comparaison entre Jésus et Marx. Jésus n’est pas plus grand ni meilleur : Il appartient à une catégorie totalement différente.

Marx était un homme et, vraisemblablement, un adorateur du Mauvais. Jésus, Lui, est un Dieu qui s’est anéanti jusqu’à la condition d’homme pour sauver l’humanité.

Marx a proposé un paradis terrestre. Mais quand les Soviets ont essayé de le rendre effectif, le résultat a été un véritable enfer.

Le Royaume de Jésus n’est pas de ce monde. C’est un Royaume d’amour, de justice et de vérité. Il appelle tous les hommes sans exception, y compris par conséquent les marxistes et partisans de Satan : « Venez à Moi, vous tous qui êtes chargés et fatigués et Moi je vous soulagerai » (Matthieu 11,28). Croyez en Lui et vous aurez la vie éternelle dans le Paradis de son ciel.

Aucun compromis possible, par conséquent, entre le christianisme et le marxisme, de même qu’entre Dieu et le diable. Jésus est venu pour détruire les oeuvres du Mauvais (1 Jean 3,8). En se mettant à Sa suite, les chrétiens essaient donc de détruire le marxisme, tout en gardant tout leur amour aux marxistes individuellement et en désirant les gagner au Christ.

Certains prétendent être des chrétiens marxistes. Ils font erreur ou ils veulent tromper les autres exprès. On ne peut pas davantage être un chrétien marxiste qu’un chrétien adorateur du diable.

Il y a un abîme entre christianisme et communisme. Un pont peut être jeté entre les deux à cette seule condition que les marxistes abandonnent leur maître inspiré de Satan, qu’ils se repentent de leurs péchés et qu’ils se mettent à la suite de Jésus.

Le présent ouvrage n’a d’autre intention que de les y acheminer.

Les marxistes sont concernés par les problèmes sociaux et politiques. Il leur faut chercher des solutions en dehors des principes marxistes. D’ailleurs pour Marx le socialisme était uniquement un prétexte. Son véritable objectif était le plan diabolique d’anéantir l’humanité pour toujours. Mais le Christ veut notre bonheur éternel.

FIN.Pages 1 à 95 incluse de l’original en français.

---

Mis en ligne en Janvier 2008.

---

---

---

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: I Banchieri di Dio

from FreemasonryWatch Website Curious Ommissions 'Inside the Brotherhood' - Martin Short 'St. Peter's Squared', Chapter 8 Excerpts Harper Collins, 1989 If they were not doing evil they would not have so great a hatred of the light. Ever since 1738 when Clement XII issued his bull In Eminenti against the 'depraved and perverted' societies of Freemasons, the Roman Catholic Church has been condemning Freemasonry as if it were the child of the devil. Ironically, it was only in recent years, as Protestant churches were at last plucking up courage to round on the brotherhood, that the Vatican softened its opposition and seemed almost to welcome its centuries-old enemy beneath the canopy of St Peter's itself. In eminenti - the first of more than twenty bulls against Freemasonry - was issued partly on doctrinal grounds but also because, in the 1730's, the Papacy felt its temporal power was being subverted by a lodge in Florence. The lodge, set up by Englishmen, was being used by English agents as a cell for intrigue and espionage. As I explain in Chapter 33, the agents target was the Stuart Pretender, James, who was holding court in the Holy City, but the lodge also contained Italian freethinkers who mocked the Papacy. On both these grounds Clement railed against societies called 'Liberi Muratori' or 'Freemasons' for the 'great mischiefs' they did to the 'temporal tranquility' of the state: Since we are taught by the divine word to watch, like a faithful servant, night and day, lest this sort of men break as thieves into the house, and like foxes endeavor to root up the vineyard... we do condemn and prohibit the same societies... The Pope commended that no members of 'the faithful in Christ', whatever their status, laymen or clergy, should join Masonic societies, or give Masons shelter, help them meet, 'afford them counsel, help or favor', assist them to recruit, or 'in any manner aid and promote them'. Those who did would suffer the penalty of excommunication, 'without any other declaration; from which no one can obtain the benefit of absolution from any other but us... except at the point of death'. Enforcing the new law fell to the Holy Inquisition which promptly jailed an Italian member of the Florence lodge. The lodge closed but some of its members still conspired against Rome. For the next 100 years Freemasonry grew throughout Italy as a cover for nationalist revolutionary activity. According to one Masonic writer, from the middle of the nineteenth century 'the salient point of Italian politics was war against Catholicism directly led by the lodges'. By 1848 Pius IX and the Papal States were overwhelmed by the movement for Italian unification. The papal prime minister was assassinated, an act which the revolutions leader, [and Mafia founder - FW] the Freemason Giuseppe Mazzini, deemed 'necessary and just'. Rome rebelled, Pius fled, and Mazzini set up a Roman Republic. It did not last. In 1850 the French put Pius back on the Roman throne, but the secret societies had signaled the end of his territorial power. Twenty years later Italian unity was achieved, largely through the efforts of three Masons; the revolutionary Mazzini, the soldier Garibaldi and the statesman Cavour. By 1870 these men had destroyed the Pope's earthly dominion. Rome was made the capital of an independent secular nation state and the Papacy was reduced to 109 acres around St. Peter's. In his tortured thirty-two year reign Pius IX issued six bulls attacking Masonry but the definitive condemnation came in 1884 with Humanum Genus, in which Leo XIII lamented that the pontiff was falsely deprived of temporal power, the stronghold of his rights and of his freedom. He was next reduced to an iniquitous condition, unbearable for its numberless burdens until it has come to this, that the sectarians may openly say what they had already in secret devised for a long time, namely, that the very spiritual power of the Pope ought to be taken away and the divine institution of the Roman Pontificate ought to disappear from the world. Leo endorsed the view that the Freemasons' 'real supreme aim' is, 'to persecute Christianity with untamed hatred, and they will never rest until they see cast to the ground all religious institutions established by the Pope'. Masons insinuate themselves 'into the hearts of Princes' in order to exploit them as 'accomplices to overcome Christianity'. Then they resole to 'shake the foundations of the thrones, and persecute, calumniate or banish those sovereigns who refuse to rule as they desire'. The Masons deceived the people too into believing that 'the Church is the cause of the iniquitous servitude and misery in which they are suffering' but, 'It would be more according to civil wisdom and more necessary to universal welfare that Princes and Peoples, instead of joining the Freemasons against the Church, should unite with the Church to resist the Freemasons' attacks'. The turning point was the Papacy of John XXIII. THE USURPATION OF GOD BY MAN OF THE APOSTATE ROBBER COUNCIL OF VATICAN II click on picture In 1962 his second Vatican Council promoted a new climate of religious tolerance and raised hopes of a coming together of all churches and faiths. It called for a dialogue with all 'men of goodwill' who showed a readiness to talk with the Church. Leading Masons felt this must include them because their order was built on a similar concept of 'gather together, beyond the limits of the various religions and world views, men of goodwill on the basis of humanistic values comprehensible and acceptable to everyone. It was also told that Masonry's moral values encourage men to embrace their own religions even more strongly, so that Catholics who are Masons become even better Catholics. In the decade after Vatican II, Catholic leaders in several countries were solicited by Freemasons. In 1968 a prominent English Mason named Harry Carr persuaded the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster to propose a softer line on Freemasonry to the Vatican. Cardinal Heenan was sympathetic because of the sad tale of one of his parishioners. In his autobiography he told of his visits to a Yeoman of the Guard (a Beefeater at the Tower of London) who was 'over seventy with a well-trimmed white beard'. The man always attended Sunday Mass and 'prayed with great recollection', but never took Communion. 'There was only one black mark in the Yeoman's record. He had not received the sacraments within living memory. His children knew the reason. In the army he had become a Freemason in the belief that this would further his career.' Heenan felt it was 'probably only a matter of time' before the general ban on Masonry would be lifted, but not even he dared ask the Vatican to allow the Yeoman to take Communion while he was still a Mason. Instead the Cardinal urged the Beefeater to quit the Craft, but he never did because he, 'was under the almost certainly false impression that he would have to cease to be a Yeoman if he resigned from his masonic lodge'. As it happens, the Yeoman's 'impression' was almost certainly correct for the Craft is strong in the army, the Territorial and in many quasi-military organizations. At that time it may have held sway among Beefeaters. Ignoring such worldly obstacles, Heenan embraced Carr's view that 'regular' Masons had never plotted against the Church and accepted the need to draw a 'sharp line' between English-style Freemasonry and the 'atheistic or anti-Christian Grand Orient type'. In his own book Carr says he urged Heenan to urge Rome that it could use the English model to distinguish between good and bad Freemasonry. He added: 'What we really need is an intermediary, to convince your authorities.' Heenan replied: 'I am your intermediary.' The Cardinal then took up the cause of 'regular' Freemasonry with Pope Paul VI. By 1971 he was able to report some progress... Similar Church-Mason canoodling was going on in France, where Freemasonry has an even stronger anti-clerical tradition than in Italy. The French Revolution was largely inspired by Masonic notions and by masons such as Diderot, Voltaire and Lafayette. French history thereafter is littered with Masonic onslaughts on Catholics and Catholicism... In March 1985 the Vatican newspaper, L' Osservatore Romano, published an article showing that all those cozy chats between folk like Harry Carr and Cardinal Heenan had missed the central issue. What mattered was not which lot of Masons plotted against the Church but whether Freemasonry's 'philosophical ideas and moral conceptions' could ever be reconciled with the fundamentals of Christian faith. Even a century before, when the Papacy had just been territorially destroyed by Masons, its opposition had been primarily doctrinal. In Humanum Genus Leo XIII condemned the brotherhood's 'rationistic naturalism'. Elsewhere, he said: 'Christianity and Freemasonry are essentially irreconcilable, so that enrolment in one means separation from the other.' L'Osservatore Romano expressed in its Latin way most of the objections later raised by Britain's Protestant Churches. Above all it must be remembered that the community of 'Freemasons' and its moral obligations are presented as a progressive system of symbols of an extremely binding nature. The rigid rule of secrecy which prevails there further strengthens the weight of the interaction of signs and ideas. For the members, this climate of secrecy entails above all the risk of becoming an instrument of strategies unknown to them. Freemasonry's 'relativism', its failure to differentiate between right and wrong paths to God, reducing all religions to facets of 'a broader and elusive truth', is unacceptable. A Catholic cannot live his relation withGod in a two-fold mode... dividing it into a supraconfessional humanitarian form and an interior Christian form. He cannot cultivate relations of two types of God, no express his relation with the Creator through symbolic forms of two types... On the one hand, a Catholic Christian cannot at the same time share in the full communion of Christian brotherhood and, on the other, look upon his Christian brother, from the Masonic perspective, as an 'outsider'. After fifteen years of flirting with Freemasonry, the Church had come back to where it had stood before Vatican II, and before that for more than 200 years. Yet from 1974 an unknown number of Catholics had joined the Craft. The Vatican has still not made clear where they now stand. Should they follow a 1911 decree which instructed Catholic Masons to move into 'passive membership' abstaining from all participation and 'communion' with Freemasonry, or quit altogether if they can so do without causing themselves or their family 'serious harm'? Without express guidance, Catholics already active in Freemasonry will probably stay active. They may find 'grave sin' more fun than Holy Communion. The dalliance is over, but crucial questions still need to be answered. Why did the kissing stop in 1981? And how had it ever begun? Was it just Vatican II which caused the Church to drop its centuries-old hostility or was some other force at work? A 'topside' interpretation might claim the kissing had to stop as soon as Germany's bishops produced a devastating statement on six years of discussion with their Masonic countrymen. In 1980 they reported: 'It is impossible to belong to the Catholic Church and to Freemasonry at the same time.' For all the Craft's humanitarian and charitable aspects, and its stand against 'materialistic ideology', it still denies the 'objective validity of revealed truth'. Being a Mason 'is to question the fundamental principles of Christian life'. The bishops slated Freemasonry for its many 'isms': indifferentism, relativism, subjectivism, deism. To the Masons 'all religions are competitive attempts to express the ultimate unattainable truth about God '. This 'undermines the faith of a Catholic' whose Church - despite Vatican II - still lays claim to absolute truth. The bishops' statement was published ten months before the Vatican made its 1981 declaration that Catholic Masons still faced excommunication, but everything they said was as plain as a Swiss Guard's pikestaff. Anyone with the slightest awareness of Catholic dogma and Masonic 'tolerance' would already have known the two could never be reconciled without intellectual dishonesty. It is unlikely, therefore, that the volte-face had nothing to do with the German bishops but everything to do with the scandal of Propaganda Massonica Due, the 'regular' Masonic Lodge otherwise known as P2. I tell the inside Masonic story of P2 in Chapter 33. Here I point out that this plot to subvert the entire Italian nation first penetrated St Peter's in the 1960s, soon after Vatican II. It was only on the eve of the P2 scandal that the Sacred Congregation published its 1981 'no-change' statement. P2's shocking 'state within a state' membership lists were discovered one month later, but magistrates had already been investigating P2's Grand Master Lucio Gelli for two years and knew how deeply he and his Masonic cronies had subverted the Vatican in the eighteen years since Paul VI had become Pope. Now the Vatican suddenly realized Freemasonry was still a perfect vehicle for conspiracies against Church and State. 'Times change,' the English bishops had said in 1974. They failed to say that Freemasonry remains the same. The P2 scandal was 1738 and 1848 all over again. 'Men of goodwill' in Britain, France and Italy would bluster that P2 had nothing to do with 'regular' Freemasonry, but this was a lie and those who uttered it were either fools or knaves. P2 was a recognized part of the 'regular' Grand Orient of Italy - itself recognized by the Grand Lodge of England in 1972 - and three successive Italian Grand Masters were up to their necks in the conspiracy. Yes Virginia, Freemasonry Lies 'Inside the Brotherhood' - Martin Short'Spooks in Aprons', Chapter 33 Excerpts Harper Collins, 1989 Despite the combined claims of Bentine, Knight and Chinaman, I sense that this 'KGB infiltration' view of British Freemasonry is a distraction: not invalid, but far less significant than the greater truth that stolid Whitehall bureaucrats have joined Freemasonry in far greater numbers than any spies. Such mandarins may be mediocre, even incompetent, but they are the people who keep the ship of state afloat. If a few of them corruptly feather their nests by feeding juicy contracts to Masonic friends in private industry, so be it. These men may not be the backbone of the civil service, but they constitute several ribs. Knight went more dangerously off-course with a second KGB theory: that Italy's P2 Masonic Lodge conspiracy was a KGB plot. He was fed this idea by someone whom he described as 'an impeccable source within British Intelligence', but his strongest evidence appears to have been the perverse fact that of all Italy's leading political parties, 'only the Communist Party had no links with P2' and so could exploit the P2 scandal with impunity. 'From the beginning,' he continued, 'Lodge P2 was a KGB-sponsored program aimed at destabilizing Italy, weakening NATO's southern flank, sweeping the Communists into power in Italy, and sending resultant shock waves throughout the western world.' Even when The Brotherhood first appeared, this seemed an unlikely story. Five years later it is clear that Knight's 'impeccable source' had filled him with disinformation. To understand this government spook's motives we have to explore the P2 story from several angles, but first a brief summary of P2. In March 1981 two Milan magistrates were investigating the fake kidnapping in 1979 of a swindling Sicilian-born international banker, Michele Sindona. They were also probing his role as financial advisor to the Vatican and the Mafia. They discovered that, while he was hiding in Palermo, one of his 'minders' had traveled 600 miles north to Arezzo to visit a textile manufacturer, Licio Gelli. They promptly ordered a search of Gelli's premises. On 17 March finance policemen discovered 962 Italian names on lists kept in his office safe and a suitcase. The names belonged to members of a Masonic Lodge named Propaganda Massonica, also known as P2. Gelli was its Venerable Master. What astonished the investigators was that the names on the lists amounted to a state within a state. They included forty-three MPs (among them three cabinet ministers), forty-three generals and eight admirals (including the current heads of all the armed forces), security service bosses, hundreds of public servants and diplomats, the police chiefs of Italy's four biggest cities, industrialists and financiers, television stars and twenty-four journalists, including the editor and publisher of Corriere della Sera. Sindona was a member. So was another controversial banker, Roberto Calvi, who would later be found hanging under London's Blackfriars Bridge. But who was Gelli? In succeeding months the magistrates discovered that this seeming small-town industrialist was a fascist war criminal who had opportunistically betrayed his colleagues as soon as he realized Germany was going to lose the war. A few years later his past caught up with him, so he fled to Argentina and made valuable political friends such as General Peron. In the mid-1960s he returned to Italy and was appointed Argentina's honorary consul. He soon had connections everywhere. He had no problems doing textile business in Eastern Europe, but he also popped up in Rome's right-wing circles. He even had friends in America's Republican Party, through whom he was invited to President Reagan's 1981 inauguration. He was masterly at collecting influential people. He manipulated them to aggrandize himself. At times his motive seemed to be financial, at others ideological, but what was his ideology? What mystified the Milan magistrates - and other people on his trail - was, who did he really work for? For Italy's secret services, for America's CIA or Russia's KGB? The KGB theory was always the least likely. There was little evidence to support it, whereas there was overwhelming proof of Gelli's continuous involvement with fascism for more than forty years. Significantly, the 'P2-KGB plot' fantasy resembles a parallel propaganda myth which fooled many other journalists at the time: that the 1981 assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II was a Bulgarian plot. "Western intelligence experts are now generally agreed that the attempted killing was inspired by the KGB," wrote Stephen Knight. If Western Intelligence experts really believed that, the West was (and is) in deep trouble. It has now been shown that this theory was concocted by two Americans: a former CIA operative named Paul Henze and a right-wing journalist named Michael Ledeen. Ledeen had previously known a rising Italian businessman, Francesco Pazienza, who had links with SISMI: Italian Military Intelligence. However, Pazienza rejects the 'Bulgarian plot' theory and claims he is himself the victim of black propaganda, falsely branded as a P2 member and as Gelli's nominated successor. He is a Mason, but says he never met Gelli. In 1988 he was sentenced to a ten years in prison over the 1980 bombing of Bologna railway station, but he claims he will be cleared on appeal. At a future date I hope to portray the political, military, and commercial rackets which P2 members have continued to perpetrate years after P2 was officially dissolved. Here I show how the reactionary forces, in Italy and America, which created P2 are tied in with British Intelligence and British Freemasonry. Many of my comments are based on evidence gathered by an Italian Parliamentary Inquiry into P2. Its 1984 report was never published in English. Indeed, it has rarely been mentioned in the British or American media, even though its contents have world wide significance. The report also helps explain why - and on what basis - British Intelligence misled Stephen Knight into believing P2 was a KGB plot. To understand P2, however, we must have some idea of the history of Freemasonry in Italy. The brotherhood has had a controversial history ever since it reached Italy in the early 1730's (see Chapter 8), but its political ascendancy was ended in 1925 when it was outlawed by the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Twenty years later it was legalized again, but only after the US Office of Strategic Services (the forerunner of the CIA) had pressured Italy's weak and impoverished government. The OSS planned to use Freemasonry just as it used the Mafia: to prop up a sickly democracy threatened by Soviet-inspired destabilization and the prospect of a communist election victory. The OSS/CIA backed Italy's strongest Masonic faction, the Grand Orient, which today has some 15,000 members. From 1961 until 1970 its Grand Master was Giordano Gamberini who (whether for the CIA or his own ends) sought to influence Italian elections by canvassing for candidates who were Freemasons and giving them money. At the time he was desperate to win recognition from the United Grand Lodge of England, which most 'regular' Masons in the world regard as the sole source of legitimacy. If England could be persuaded to recognize the Grand Orient, all other Grand Lodges would follow suit. England had always refused, largely because of Italian Freemasonry's historic involvement in politics. This offends the Basic Principles on which England's Grand Lodge decides whether to recognize any other. Principal 7 states: 'The discussion of politics and religion within the Lodge shall be strictly prohibited.' By meddling in politics Gamberini was breaching this principal, so the Grand Lodge of England should have shunned him like the plague. Instead it acted as if in totally favor - or blissful ignorance - of his political game. In the 1960s Grand Lodge was more distracted by the fact that the Grand Orient (also known as 'Palazzo Giustiani') was one of two Italian Grand Lodges clamoring for recognition. There was also the Palazzo del Gesu, with some 5,000 members. James Stubbs, then England's Grand Secretary, described the dilemma in his 1985 biography, Freemasonry in my Life: It was... well known in Italy that we were not prepared to plump for one, leaving the other out, or even to recognize them both; eventually the moment came when at last the cracks were papered over and the Palazzo Giustiniani seemed to be in control. We felt justified in recognizing Italy. The man who had master-minded the unification of the Grand Orient and Palazzo del Gesu, paving the way for recognition by England, was none other than the subsequently notorious Licio Gelli. He had entered Freemasonry only in 1965, yet he was instantly recommended to Grand Master Gamberini as someone 'able to make a great contribution to the institution in terms of recruiting qualified people'; in other words, to draw into Masonry men dedicated to right-wing goals. If we remember the OSS's fierce anti-communist intent in resurrecting Freemasonry after World War II, and Gamerini's 1960s electioneering, it is clear that the political meddling of modern Italian Freemasonry did not start with Licio Gelli. He merely increased its effectiveness. In 1970 a Florence doctor named Lino Salvini became Grand Master. This freed Gamberini to act as the Grand Orient's roving ambassador in the search for international recognition. At the same time he sought to develop Propaganda Massonica Lodge (P2) as a nexus for the Italian Right to seize control of Italian society, if ever the need arose. The lodge had been founded in 1877 to meet the needs of provincial Masons living temporarily in Rome and thus unable to attend their home lodges. It soon evolved into a 'reserved' or secret lodge whose members were known only to the Grand Secretary, allegedly to protect them from Papal wrath. In the mid-1960s P2 had only fourteen members, but in 1970 Salvini asked Gelli to 'restructure' the lodge. Suddenly numbers soared. Within a decade it had 400 members, a few years later almost 1,000. Gelli has received all the credit and blame for this achievement, but Gamberini supervised many of the initiation ceremonies which Gelli performed in P2's Excelsior Hotel headquarters. Grand Master Salvini was just as involved. In December 1971 he told P2 members that henceforth they could pursue their 'profane' (worldly) aims under the cover of their concealed order: If until known it has not been possible to meet at our places of work, with this restructuring we shall have the possibility and pleasure of more frequent meetings, to discuss not only the various problems of a social and economic order which interest our brothers, but also those regarding the whole of society. The minutes of one P2 meeting in the early 1970s reveal what kind of society appealed to Gelli, Salvini and Gamberini. Gelli wrote that members discussed: the political and economic situation of Italy, the threat of the Italian Communist Party, in accord with clericalism, aiming at the conquest of power, the lack of power in the forces of law and order, the spread of immorality, indiscipline and all the worst aspects of morality and civic virtue... relationships with the Italian state. In a note to absent members Gelli added: Many have asked... how we should behave if one morning we awoke to find the clerico-Communists had seized power, whether it would be best to resign ourselves to passive acquiescence, or to take on well-defined positions - and if so, on the basis of what emergency plan. In other words, P2 was a secret cell for the preparation of a right-wing coup like those which engulfed Greece in 1967 and Chile in 1973 (in Chile's case, to overthrow President Allende, who was a communist Freemason of an 'irregular' Masonic order). Gelli hosted frequent P2 meetings where the politics of destabilization and subversion were discussed by police chiefs, army generals, security service bosses and appeal court judges. He knew this was not orthodox Freemasonry: 'Philosophy has been banished, but we felt we had to do this in order to tackle only solid and concrete arguments affecting national life.' During these years Grand Master Salvini knew exactly what Gelli was doing, indeed he had told him to do it. The same year that P2 'banished philosophy' with Salvini's blessing, Salvini himself was blessed by the Grand Lodge of England. In September 1972 Great Queen Street declared it was 'convinced that the time is ripe and conditions are favorable' for recognizing the Grand Orient. The 1970s were some of the blackest years in the history of modern Italy. The state was torn apart by left- and right- wing terror, but many of the horrific acts originally blamed on the Left (from the Red Brigades to the Communist Party) turned out to be acts of black propaganda by the extreme Right. These included the 'Italicus' train bombing in 1974, in which twelve people were killed, and the 1980 Bologna Station massacre in which eight-five died. In both events P2 had a guiding control. In July 1976 the Grand Orient formally suspended P2, but Salvini secretly authorized it to carry on. At a meeting in Rome in September a 'democratic' Mason named Francesco Siniscalchi asked Salvini to answer a series of questions on Gelli and P2. Siniscalchi added that if a 'profane' (non-Masonic) magistrate ever asked him what he knew about Masonic wrongdoing he would have to tell the truth. Salvini not only refused to answer the questions; he expelled Siniscalchi and other 'democratic' Masons from the Grand Orient as traitors for daring to confront him. In December 1976 he (Siniscalchi) gave Rome judges a dossier exposing numerous illegalities by Gelli and his P2 clan. It was this dossier, and other discoveries by Siniscalchi, which first exposed the P2 conspiracy to 'profane' eyes. Five years later, when finance police raided Gelli's office, they already had a good idea from Siniscalchi what they might find. In 1987 I wrote to Grand Secretary Ernesto Zampieri and asked why the Grand Orient had not reinstated its expelled brother Siniscalchi and honored him for the sterling service which he had done Italian Freemasonry exposing the evil of P2. Zampieri's reply made no reference to Siniscalchi but stated: 'We can assure you that our organs of Justice do act with a great sense of responsibility from the safeguard of our institution.' This presumably means Siniscalchi will not be reinstated, probably because the Grand Orient feels he has done it no good whatsoever. Like many Masons who practice the movement's finest principals, Siniscalchi has been ostracized by his Masonic bosses who, no doubt, would have preferred him to keep his mouth shut. In September 1981 the Grand Lodge of England felt obliged to explain where it stood to its own bemused members, 'in view of the very wide publicity attracted by the so-called P2 Lodge'. It said it had recognized the Grand Orient in 1972 when satisfied that it accepted Principle no. 7 banning discussion of politics and religion. Now, Grand Lodge said, it 'had been informed' that the Grand Orient had suspended P2 in 1976 and had authorized no Masonic activity by P2 since then. Licio Gelli had also been suspended, and the Grand Orient had recently reaffirmed adherence to the Principles of Recognition, including no. 7. Grand Lodge would keep the matter under review, but in the meantime did not intend to take action. Had Grand Lodge 'been informed' of the real truth if would have had to take action, even to withdraw recognition, but its 1981 statement contained many untruths. P2 was not a 'so-called' lodge. It had been a legitimate lodge for almost a century. Furthermore, its suspension in 1976 had been a sham for as we have seen, Grand Master Salvini promptly authorized it to carry on. In 1977 he instructed Gelli to continue 'perfecting the Masonic vocation of P2 members: You will answer only to me for what you do to this end, promoting and encouraging those activities which you think of use and interest to Masonry. I am sure that you will conduct the task with the fearless spirit you showed when faced by the treacherous attacks of the traitors of the institution. Grand Master Salvini resigned in 1978, but his successor, General Ennio Battelli, continued to accept all Gelli's recruits as legitimate Freemasons. In 1980 the Grand Orient was still accepting lump sum payments from Licio Gelli as P2 members' dues. Battelli also supplied Gelli with blank Grand Orient membership cards. In autumn 1981, when P2 had at last been officially dissolved and Gelli suspended, the Grand Orient transferred P2's members to other lodges: an act which proved the P2 shut-down was a cosmetic device. In reality the lodges reactionary ethos was now spread like a virus throughout the Grand Orient. Salvini had been forced to resign because of intense American Masonic dissatisfaction over his relationship with Gelli. Yet the new Grand Master, General Ennio Battelli, brought even greater shame on the movement. It turned out that Gelli had paid for Battelli's Masonic election campaign and then gave him regular pay-offs in succeeding years. The general would later be charged with criminal involvement with the Bologna Station massacre. When England's Grand Lodge goes silent about a Masonic controversy the nearest thing to a leak may be found in the magazine Masonic Square. In March 1987 it published an article on Italian Freemasonry which referred to the 'bogus P2 lodge, a spurious body not affiliated in any way to the Grand Orient.' Was this untruth published through ignorance or had the writer been fed disinformation to delude England's Masonic faithful? Either way the writer also claimed that the Grand Orient 'enjoys the warmest relations' with the Grand Lodges of England, Ireland and Scotland. Perhaps these 'warmest relations' have blinded England's Grand Lodge to the need to discover and disseminate the truth about Italian Freemasonry. To spread the myth that P2 was a perversion, rather than the logical climax, of the Grand Orient tradition would obviously suit the Grand Orient. In the early 1980's not only England's Masonic masses but also much of the Western press were hoodwinked into thinking P2 was not part of Freemasonry at all. This was necessary if a second act of deception - blaming the P2 scandal on the KGB - could be achieved without tainting the Grand Orient or the Grand Lodge of England. This may explain why British Intelligence sought to mislead Stephen Knight in 1983. Masonic Lodge Propaganda Due (P2) St. Peter's Banker Luigi DiFonzoFranklin Watts Ltd. 1983 Formed in the 19th century by the Grande Orient of Italy for the elites, the organization evolved out of the violent organization known as the Carbonari. Pagan elements suffused the rituals of the organization to which all Grand Masters of regular Italian Freemasonry of course belonged. The head was known as Naj Hannah (King Cobra). In interviews two former members have described the oaths they took. They were taken to a compound, a Villa hidden in the Apennines in the region of Tuscany. A 12-foot wall seals the neatly manicured grounds from view. In the centre of the main courtyard stands a fountain shaped like a tree trunk. The cobra-like sculpture, with its inflated hood, watches over the compound in a protective posture, as if ready to strike. The cobra's head is twice the size of a human skull. It has a single eye, which is blue during daylight and red after nightfall, for inside the cobra's hood and behind its eye there is a closed-circuit camera that follows a visitor, invited or unwelcome, as the fountain rotates in the direction the intruder moves. The fountain-camera is controlled from a room within the villa where eight monitors, each with five stations, cover eight guest rooms, patio, pool, dining room, sitting room, and party room. Approximately ten cameras, including the one inside the cobra, have infrared lenses. All of the exterior cameras are camouflaged by the landscaping. The Villa's interior is magnificent. Every room has marble floors and is furnished with antiques. Observing the high ceilings, the finely crafted gold-leaf moldings, the portraits of Mussolini, Hitler, and Peron, the visitor experiences a feeling, a sort of living, breathing odor of danger and power that penetrates the soul and cell by cell contaminates the mind with fear. The year is 1964. In the meeting room, twelve members of P-2, dressed in satin ceremonial robes and wearing black hoods reminiscent of those worn by members of the Ku Klux Klan, sit in leather chairs at a red marble conference table. They are the elite members of the Wolf Pack, Gelli's disciples - some say his execution squad. None of the black-clad disciples knows the identity of any of his eleven brothers. Grand Master Licio Gelli is the only one who bares his face. Two Masons stand post at the entrance to the meeting room. Their faces are also covered. They are Naja Hannah's personal bodyguards some say his death squad-former Mussolini Facists whose job is to protect the Grand Master and kill any of the twelve disciples who betray the cause "Il Momento di Passare all..." (The Time for Real Action)... Like Naja Hannah and his disciples, each bodyguard carries an axe; they also bear automatic weapons. The ceremony begins. There is an uneven series of knocks at the door. "Your Worshipful," a disciple announces, "a pagan wishes to enter". The Grand Master strikes the table with one blow with his axe. Immediately the oversized door swings open and slams against the inner wall. Two guards escort the initiate to the center of the room where he faces the twelve Masons with his back to the grand masters throne. The Pagan, as he is called, is wearing a plain black hood and a blindfold. His identity is known to Grand Master Licio Gelli but to no one else. He is asked one question by each of the disciples, but the Pagan does not answer, instead, one of the guards speaks for him. Once all the ritual questions about purpose and belief and reason for wanting to become a member of Propaganda Due are answered, the Pagan is turned to face the Grand Master, who asks, "Pagan, are you prepared to die in order to preserve the secrets of Propaganda Due?" The initiate now answers for himself: "I am" "Do you have the necessary quality of contempt for danger?" "I do" "Do you have the necessary quality of courage?" "I am courageous" "Do you proclaim yourself an Anti-Communist?" "I do" "And Pagan, are you prepared to fight and perhaps face shame, even death, so that we who may become your Brothers may destroy this Government and form a Presidency?" "I am" Then the blindfold is removed. It takes a moment for the initiate's vision to clear, because this is the first time since entering the compound that he has been allowed to see light. The blindfold serves a purpose other than security. It also represents the power of P-2: "Without membership one is blind; with the help of the order, however, the way is clear." Licio Gelli, Grand Master P2 St. Peter's Banker Luigi DiFonzoFranklin Watts Ltd. 1983 Called Naja Hannah (King Cobra) by P2 members. Born 1919 in Pistoia, a provincial capital of Tuscany. At Seventeen he left high school to fight with the Fascist Italian Blackshirt division in Spain, and during World War II Gelli zealously supported the Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini. Gelli served as an Officer in the notorious German SS Herman Goering Division which saw extensive duty in the battles of Sicily and Mainland Italy. When the dictator fell, Gelli fled to Argentina, where he allied himself with Juan Peron, became Peron's economic advisor to Italy, and was granted dual citizenship. Operated the "Rat Line" which orchestrated the escape of hundreds of indicted or suspected Nazi War Criminals, "Scientists", and Nazi Intelligence Officers including likely Klaus Barbie the Butcher of Lyon, Via Switzerland to South America under the direction of OSS/CIA, and M.I.5 using the code name "Operation Paperclip". With the help of the Grande Oriente of Italy the Anti-Fascist Commission cleared Gelli of War Crime charges related to his involvement with the executions of Partisans by the SS, contradicting claims by Masons of Anti-Masonry by Italian Fascists, and Anti-Fascism by Italian Masons. When Juan Peron died, Eva Peron called him back to organize the transition. In early 1960's he joined the Masonic Order of Freemasonry known in Italy as the Grande Oriente (recognized by mainstream Freemasonry UGLE & U.S. Grand Lodges). As Grand Master of P2 Gelli declared himself "a lifelong anti-communist". Secret Head of CIA and MI5 "Stay Behind" Underground Resistance Force Plan with the codename Operation "Gladio", who worked under the direct supervision of Freemason Dulles, who later became the CIA director fired by JFK. In the event of a takeover by Communists or anyone else the CIA, MI5 or Pentagon didn't like in Europe or Latin America, "Gladio" would wage a clandestine war of subversion and terrorism against the offending Government/Movement/People. This is likely what happened to Salvador Allende of Chile and the Socialist Government of Greece in the "Colonels Coupe". Under Gelli P2 Masonic Lodge was the most powerful, political, and violent secret organization in Italy. Important Italian Generals, magistrates, and businessmen became members of P2 Masonic Lodge which Gelli served from the hierarchy of Freemasonry. Determined to destroy Italy's parliamentary system of government in order to form a Presidential Dictatorship, Gelli recruited members who swore allegiance to him rather than to the nation of Italy. Gelli was not brilliant so much as shrewd and devious. He had money and power, but he realized that wealth and position meant little without the weapon of fear. Gelli believed that fear was the instrument by which real power could be masterfully employed, and he believed fear was most useful when cloaked in silence. So Grand Master Gelli divided members of P2 Masonic Lodge into divisions and forbade them to disclose their membership. In 1980 Gelli was the Guest of Honour at one of Ronald Reagan's Presidential Inauguration Balls. It has been suggested that Gelli worked closely with Reagan CIA Director Appointee William Casey in the "October Surprise" involving the delayed release of U.S. hostages held by the Ayatollah Khomeini until after the elections, which contributed greatly to Jimmy Carters defeat. Ronald Reagan received an "honorary" 33rd Scottish Rite Freemason Degree after he was elected President. Michele Sindona St. Peter's Banker Luigi DiFonzoFranklin Watts Ltd. 1983 Pope Paul VI's banker and confident. This was part of an elaborate scheme by the Mafia, the CIA, MI-5, Neo Fascist Groups, and the defacto controlling body of all Italian Freemasonry - P2 (which was called by Italy's Interior Minister a State within a State) to subvert, bankrupt, and destroy the Vatican and the Parliamentary System and replace it with a "Presidential" system (i.e. a Dictatorship). Born in 1920 in Patti, Sicily. Sindona became the most successful tax lawyer and the most powerful banker in Italy. Years later, as one of the wealthiest men in the world, Sindona was identified by the Italian and U.S. governments as the Mafia's banker (appointed as such at a International Mafia conclave in Palermo Sicily in 1957). He was accused of washing heroin profits through his banks and of smuggling currency out of Italy through the Bank of the Vatican and help organize with P2 Grand Master Gelli and the CIA/MI5 the coup in Greece in '69, an attempted coup in Italy plus others in Spain and Latin America). In 1972 Sindona purchased controlling interest of Franklin National Bank. Two years later Franklin Bank collapsed, the largest bank failure in American history. On August 2, 1979, while under indictment,Michele Sindona disappeared and was believed to have been kidnapped by left-wing terrorists (subsequently proved to be a staged kidnapping by Sindona and the Mafia to avoid trial). He reappeared on October 16, 1979, was later convicted of bank fraud, and was sentenced to twenty five years in prison. P2 Masonic Lodge Member. Roberto Calvi, Banco Ambrosiano President St. Peter's Banker Luigi DiFonzoFranklin Watts Ltd. 1983 Member Masonic Lodge P2. Received millions of dollars from CIA and British Intelligence which he laundered to P2 for support of various right wing activities and coups throughout Southern Europe and Latin America. Calvi's secretary "falls" to her death from 4th floor window of Banks International Headquarters and then the next day Calvi is found hanging from Black Friars bridge in London with a false passport and twelve pounds of bricks and rocks shoved in his pockets (i.e. masonry). Flavio Carboni and Roberto Calvi's Flight The Life & Death of Roberto Calvi Rupert Cornwell Rome Correspondant The Financial Post Victor Golancz Ltd, 1983 Flavio Carboni is perhaps the key figure in the final stages of Calvi's life. From January 1982 onwards, he would with with increasing frequency visit Calvi in Milan, or for weekend consultations at Drezzo. The small Sardinian, who once boasted to his family he would become the richest man in Italy, would be companion and paid counselor to the chairman of Ambrosiano, right up to the end. Vaunting contacts among the Roman politicians, the press and the highest echelons of Italian Freemasonry, Carboni took over the role that Gelli had once assumed for Calvi - and more besides. For Carboni was not only on good terms with Armando Corona, who in March 1982 was to become the head of the Italian Grand Orient. He could also enlist the services of such as Ernesto Diotallevi andDanilo Abbruciati, notorious bosses of the Rome underworld. Magistrates would later charge that Carboni's building and property businesses were used to recycle the proceeds of organized crime and maybe right-wing terrorism also. In most of the subsequent discoveries which seemed to link Calvi's Ambrosiano with common crime, the name of Carboni would be a constant thread. Calvi was attracted to Carboni, as he was to Pazienza, by his promised access to hidden and therefore real power. Precisely to what extent his helpers were in collusion it is hard to establish. But Calvi feared Carboni, just as he was afraid of Pazienza with his vaguely threatening braggadocio, and well-advertised secret service connections. Reading of The Godfather was not only instructive of the advantages of hidden power, but also of the fate which might befall those who offended it. Calvi was by this stage scared not only for his own safety (his retinues of bullet-proof Alfa Romeos and bodyguards were costing his bank four million lire every day) but for that of his family as well. From February on, he was imploring his wife to leave Italy for somewhere less dangerous. In May, and with some reluctance, she finally yielded to his urgings and went to join their son Carlo in Washington. And with good reason, for the violent undertows gripping Ambrosiano's affairs had broken dramatically to the surface.  Roberto Rosone The Life & Death of Roberto Calvi Rupert Cornwell Rome Correspondant The Financial Post Victor Golancz Ltd, 1983 Despite his lofty rank of general manager and deputy chairman of Banco Ambrosiano, had lived for many years in a modest first-floor flat in a corner block of Via Olofredi, close to the central station in Milan. On the ground floor of the same building was the branch office No. 18 of Ambrosiano in Milan. It was protected round the clock by armed private guards, as indeed are bank premises up and down Italy, as a matter of routine. On the morning of April 27, 1982 Rosone left as usual for his office shortly after 8 a.m. Suddenly, as he turned into the street, a man with a pistol stepped forward and fired wounding him in the legs. But the guards had quickly noticed the danger and shot back, killing the assailant outright. To their great surprise police identified the corpse as that of no ordinary Milanese delinquent, but the important Rome gangland figure Abbruciati. Abbrucati's links with Carboni, and indeed Carboni's intimate dealings with Calvi, were not yet public knowledge. Even so, the episode raised more questions than it answered, casting a yet more sinister shadow over Ambrosiano. What was a high-ranking gangster from Rome doing carrying out a task that would normally fall to a minion ? Was the attack a botched attempt at murder, to punish Rosone for some affront to the underworld; or was it a deliberate warning and no more, delivered in classic fashion? Or was the warning intended not for him but for Calvi himself? Later, after Calvi and Ambrosiano had perished, as still darker possibility emerged - that Calvi himself, through Carboni and Abbruciati, was directly or indirectly responsible for the attack on his own vice-chairman, suspected of plotting against him. What is certain is that Carboni was already receiving money from Calvi. In Italy, Ambrosiano lent large sums to companies owned by Carboni, and Calvi even provided finance to help the campaign of Corona to become the new head of Italian Freemasonry. Timeline Early September 1978: Pope John Paul I asks his secretary of state, Cardinal Jean Villot, to initiate an investigation into Vatican bank operations. September 28, 1978: John Paul I presents Cardinal Villot with a list of people who are to be transferred, asked for their resignations, or reassigned. All the people on the list are suspected to be members of the Freemason's group "P2." The reshuffle of power will have major implications for the existing Vatican power structure and its financial dealings. September 29, 1978: John Paul I found dead in his bed. Villot issues false statements to the press about the circumstances surrounding the death, removes key evidence from John Paul's room, and orders the body to be embalmed immediately without an autopsy. October 1978: John Paul II to replace John Paul I. None of John Paul I's instructions to Villot before his death are carried out. January 21, 1979: Murder of Judge Emilio Alessandrini, the Milan magistrate investigating the activities of Banco Ambrosiano, whose director, Roberto Calvi, has close ties with Michele Sindona and the Vatican. March 20, 1979: Murder of Mino Pecorelli, an investigative journalist in the process of publishing articles exposing the membership and dealings of "P2" -- a powerful group of Freemasons whose membership was involved in Vatican financial dealings, and whose founder, Lucio Gelli, was deeply connected with Roberto Calvi. March 25, 1979: Arrests on false charges of Mario Sarcinelli and Paolo Baffi of the Bank of Italy. The two men were pressing for action on the investigation of the financial dealings of Roberto Calvi and Banco Ambrosiano. July 11, 1979: Murder of Giorgio Ambrosoli following his testimony concerning Michele Sindona's financial dealings with Calvi and other Vatican interests, the activities of P2 and its members among powerful government and business circles, and the connections between Calvi, Sindona, and Bishop Paul Marcinkus of the Vatican Bank. July 13, 1979: Murder of Lt. Col. Antonio Varisco, head of the Rome security service, who was investigating the activities and membership of P2 and had spoken with Giorgio Ambrosoli two days before Ambrosoli's death. July 21, 1979: Murder of Boris Guilano, the Palermo police deputy superintendent and head of Palermo CID. Guilano had spoken with Giorgio Ambrosoli two days before Ambrosoli's death concerning Sindona's laundering of Mafia money through the Vatican Bank into Switzerland. October 1979: Bomb explosion at the apartment of Enrico Cuccia, managing director of Mediobanca and witness to Sindona's threat to the life of Giorgio Ambrosoli. February 2, 1980: The Vatican withdraws at the last moment its agreement that Cardinals Guiseppe Caprio and Sergio Guerri and Bishop Paul Marcinkus will provide videotaped depositions on behalf of Michele Sindona in his trial in the US on charges of fraud, conspiracy and misappropriation of funds in connection with the collapse of Franklin National Bank. May 13, 1980: Michele Sindona attempts suicide in jail. June 13, 1980: Michele Sindona sentenced to 25 years. July 8, 1980: Roberto Calvi attempts suicide while in jail on charges of fraud, etc. Later released on bail and reconfirmed as chairman of Banco Ambrosiano. September 1, 1981: The Vatican Bank, apparently at the request of Roberto Calvi, issues "letters of comfort" acknowledging its controlling interest in, and assuming responsibility for, a more than 1 billion dollar debt of a number of banks controlled by Calvi. January 12, 1981: A group of shareholders in Banco Ambrosiano send a letter to John Paul II outlining the connections between the Vatican Bank, Roberto Calvi and the P2 and the Mafia. The letter is never acknowledged. April 27, 1982: Attempted murder of Roberto Rosone, general manager and deputy chairman of Banco Ambrosiano, who was trying to "clean up" the bank's operation. June 17, 1982: Roberto Calvi (image right) found hanged to death from a bridge in London. A few days later, a 1.3 billion dollar "hole" is discovered in Banco Ambrosiano, Milan. October 2, 1982: Guiseppe Dellacha, executive at Banco Ambrosiano, dead of a fall from a window of Banco Ambrosiano, in Milan. March 23, 1986: Michele Sindona found dead of poisoning in the Italian jail to which he had been extradited on charges of ordering the murder of Giorgio Ambrosoli. Albino Luciano, Pope John Paul I In Gods' Name David Yallop Bantam Books, 1984 "On September 28, 1978, he had been pope for thirty-three days. In little more than a month he had initiated various courses of action that, had they been completed, would have had a direct and dynamic effect on us all. The majority in this world would have applauded his decisions, a minority would have been appalled. The man who had quickly been labeled "the smiling pope" intended to remove the smiles from a number of faces on the following day." "The Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Jean Villot... studied the list of appointments, resignations to be asked for and transfers the pope had handed him. He had advised, argued, and remonstrated, but to no avail. Luciani had been adamant." "It was by any standards a dramatic reshuffle. It would set the Church in new directions - directions that Villot, and the others on the list who were about to be replaced, considered highly dangerous...." "There was one common denominator, one fact that linked each of the men about to be replaced. Villot was aware of it. More important, so was the pope. It had been one of the factors that had caused him to act, to strip these men of real power...it was Freemasonry." "The evidence the pope had acquired indicated that within the Vatican City State there were over one hundred Masons, ranging from cardinals to priests." "Luciani was further preoccupied with an illegal Masonic lodge that had penetrated far beyond Italy in its search for wealth and power. It called itself P2. The fact that it had penetrated the Vatican walls and formed links with priests, bishops, and even cardinals made P2 anathema to Albino Luciani." "That evening, September 28, 1978, thirty-three days after his election, Pope John Paul I, "the smiling pope", was declared dead. No official death certificate has ever been issued. No autopsy ever performed. His body was hastily embalmed. Cause of death: Unknown. And Vatican business continues..." "The facts are here in meticulous detail, documenting widespread corruption within the Vatican and presenting a compelling case that six powerful men, to protect their vast financial and political operations, decided on a shocking course of action -- Pope John Paul I must die." A List of Masons in the Vatican and Italian Church? The following is a list of Masons reprinted with some updates from the Bulletin de l'Occident Chrétien Nr.12, July, 1976, (Directeur Pierre Fautrad a Fye - 72490 Bourg Le Roi.) All of the men on this list, if they in fact be Masons, are excommunicated by Canon Law 2338. Each man's name is followed by his position, if known; the date he was initiated into Masonry, his code #; and his code name, if known: Albondi, Alberto. Bishop of Livorno, (Leghorn). Initiated 8-5-58; I.D. # 7-2431. Abrech, Pio. In the Sacred Congregation Bishops. 11-27-67; # 63-143. Acquaviva, Sabino. Professor of Religion at the University of Padova, (Padua). 12-3-69; # 275-69. Alessandro, Father Gottardi. (Addressed as Doctor in Masonic meetings.) President of Fratelli Maristi. 6-14-59. Angelini Fiorenzo. Bishop of Messenel Greece. 10-14-57; # 14-005. Argentieri, Benedetto. Patriarch to the Holy See. 3-11-70; # 298-A. Bea, Augustin. Cardinal. Secretary of State (next to Pope) under Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI. Baggio, Sebastiano. Cardinal. Prefect of the Sacred Congregation of Bishops. (This is a crucial Congregation since it appoints new Bishops.) Secretary of State under Pope John Paul II from 1989 to 1992. 8-14-57; # 85-1640. Masonic code name "SEBA." He controls consecration of Bishops. Balboni, Dante. Assistant to the Vatican Pontifical . Commission for Biblical Studies. 7-23-68; # 79-14 "BALDA." Baldassarri Salvatore. Bishop of Ravenna, Italy. 2-19-58; # 4315-19. "BALSA." Balducci, Ernesto. Religious sculpture artist. 5-16-66; # 1452-3. Basadonna, Ernesto. Prelate of Milan, 9-14-63; # 9-243. "BASE." Batelli, Guilio. Lay member of many scientific academies. 8-24-59; # 29-A. "GIBA." Bedeschi, Lorenzo. 2-19-59; # 24-041. "BELO." Belloli, Luigi. Rector of Seminar; Lombardy, Ita- ly. 4-6-58; # 22-04. "BELLU." Belluchi, Cleto. Coadjutor Bishop of Fermo, Italy. 6-4-68; # 12-217. Bettazzi, Luigi. Bishop of Ivera, Italy. 5-11-66; # 1347-45. "LUBE." Bianchi, Ciovanni. 10-23-69; # 2215-11. "BIGI." Biffi, Franco, Msgr. Rector of Church of St. John Lateran Pontifical University. He is head of this University and controls what is being taught. He heard confessions of Pope Paul VI. 8-15-59. "BIFRA." Bicarella, Mario. Prelate of Vicenza, Italy. 9-23-64; # 21-014. "BIMA." Bonicelli, Gaetano. Bishop of Albano, Italy. 5-12-59; # 63-1428, "BOGA." Boretti, Giancarlo. 3-21-65; # 0-241. "BORGI." Bovone, Alberto. Substitute Secretary of the Sacred Office. 3-30-67; # 254-3. "ALBO." Brini, Mario. Archbishop. Secretary of Chinese, Oriental, and Pagans. Member of Pontifical Commission to Russia. Has control of rewriting Canon Law. 7-7-68; # 15670. "MABRI." Bugnini, Annibale. Archbishop. Wrote Novus Ordo Mass. Envoy to Iran, 4-23-63; # 1365-75. "BUAN." Buro, Michele. Bishop. Prelate of Pontifical Commission to Latin America, 3-21-69; # 140-2. "BUMI." Cacciavillan, Agostino. Secretariat of State. 11-6-60; # 13-154. Cameli, Umberto. Director in Office of the Ecclesiastical Affairs of Italy in regard to education in Catholic doctrine. 11-17-60; # 9-1436. Caprile, Giovanni. Director of Catholic Civil Affairs. 9-5-57; # 21-014. "GICA." Caputo, Giuseppe. 11-15-71; # 6125-63. "GICAP." Casaroli, Agostino. Cardinal. Secretary of State (next to Pope) under Pope John Paul II since July 1, 1979 until retired in 1989. 9-28-57; # 41-076. "CASA." Cerruti, Flaminio. Chief of the Office of the University of Congregation Studies. 4-2-60; # 76-2154. "CEFLA." Ciarrocchi, Mario. Bishop. 8-23-62; # 123-A. "CIMA." Chiavacci, Enrico. Professor of Moral Theology, University of Florence, Italy. 7-2-70; # 121-34. "CHIE." Conte, Carmelo. 9-16-67; # 43-096. "CONCA." Csele, Alessandro. 3-25-60; # 1354-09. "ALCSE." Dadagio, Luigi. Papal Nuncio to Spain. Archbishop of Lero. 9-8-67. # 43-B. "LUDA." D'Antonio, Enzio. Archbishop of Trivento. 6-21-69; # 214-53. De Bous, Donate. Bishop. 6-24-68; # 321-02. "DEBO." Del Gallo Reoccagiovane, Luigi. Bishop. Del Monte, Aldo. Bishop of Novara, Italy. 8-25-69; # 32-012. "ADELMO." Faltin, Danielle. 6-4-70; # 9-1207. "FADA." Ferraioli, Giuseppe. Member of Sacred Congregation for Public Affairs. 11-24-69; # 004-125. "GIFE." Fiorenzo, Angelinin. Bishop. Title of Commendator of the Holy Spirit. Vicar General of Roman Hospitals. Controls hospital trust funds. Consecrated Bishop 7-19-56; joined Masons 10-14-57. Franzoni, Giovanni. 3-2-65; # 2246-47. "FRAGI." Gemmiti, Vito. Sacred Congregation of Bishops. 3-25-68; # 54-13. "VIGE." Girardi, Giulio. 9-8-70; # 1471-52. "GIG." Giustetti, Massimo. 4-12-70; # 13-065. "GIUMA." Gottardi, Alessandro. Procurator and Postulator General of Fratelli Maristi. Archbishop of Trent. 6-13-59; # 2437-14. "ALGO." Gozzini, Mario. 5-14-70; # 31-11. "MAGO." Grazinai, Carlo. Rector of the Vatican Minor Seminary. 7-23-61; # 156-3. "GRACA." Gregagnin, Antonio. Tribune of First Causes for Beatification. 10-19-67; # 8-45. "GREA." Gualdrini, Franco. Rector of Capranica. 5-22-61; # 21-352. "GUFRA." Ilari, Annibale. Abbot. 3-16-69; # 43-86. "ILA." Laghi, Pio. Nunzio, Apostolic Delegate to Argentina, and then to U.S.A. until 1995. 8-24-69; # 0-538. "LAPI." Lajolo, Giovanni. Member of Council of Public Affairs of the Church. 7-27-70; # 21-1397. "LAGI." Lanzoni, Angelo. Chief of the Office of Secretary of State. 9-24-56; # 6-324. "LANA." Levi, Virgillio (alias Levine), Monsignor. Assistant Director of Official Vatican Newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano. Manages Vatican Radio Station. 7-4-58; # 241-3. "VILE." Lozza, Lino. Chancellor of Rome Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas of Catholic Religion. 7-23-69; # 12-768. "LOLI." Lienart, Achille. Cardinal. Grand Master top Mason. Bishop of Lille, France. Recruits Masons. Was leader of progressive forces at Vatican II Council. Macchi, Pasquale. Cardinal. Pope Paul's Prelate of Honour and Private Secretary until he was excommunicated for heresy by Pope Paul VI. Was reinstated by Secretary of State Jean Villot, and made a Cardinal. 4-23-58; # 5463-2. "MAPA." Mancini, Italo. Director of Sua Santita. 3-18-68; # l551-142. "MANI." Manfrini, Enrico. Lay Consultor of Pontifical Commission of Sacred Art. 2-21-68; # 968-c. "MANE." Marchisano, Francesco. Prelate Honour of the Pope. Secretary Congregation for Seminaries and Universities of Studies. 2-4-61; 4536-3. "FRAMA." Marcinkus, Paul. American bodyguard for imposter Pope. From Cicero, Illinois. Stands 6'4". President for Institute for Training Religious. 8-21-67; # 43-649. Called "GORILLA." Code name "MARPA." Marsili, Saltvatore. Abbot of Order of St. Benedict of Finalpia near Modena, Italy. 7-2-63; # 1278-49. "SALMA." Mazza, Antonio. Titular Bishop of Velia. Secretary General of Holy Year, 1975. 4-14-71. # 054-329. "MANU." Mazzi, Venerio. Member of Council of Public Affairs of the Church. 10-13-66; # 052-s. "MAVE." Mazzoni, Pier Luigi. Congregation of Bishops. 9-14-59; # 59-2. "PILUM." Maverna, Luigi. Bishop of Chiavari, Genoa, Italy. Assistant General of Italian Catholic Azione. 6-3-68; # 441-c. "LUMA." Mensa, Albino. Archbishop of Vercelli, Piedmont, Italy. 7-23-59; # 53-23. " MENA." Messina, Carlo. 3-21-70; # 21-045. "MECA." Messina, Zanon (Adele). 9-25-68; # 045-329. " AMEZ." Monduzzi, Dino. Regent to the Prefect of the Pontifical House. 3-11 -67; # 190-2. "MONDI." Mongillo, Daimazio. Professor of Dominican Moral Theology, Holy Angels Institute of Roma. 2-16-69;# 2145-22. "MONDA." Morgante, Marcello. Bishop of Ascoli Piceno in East Italy. 7-22-55; # 78-3601. MORMA." Natalini, Teuzo. Vice President of the Archives of Secretariat of the Vatican. 6-17-67; # 21-44d. "NATE." Nigro, Carmelo. Rector of the Seminary, Pontifical of Major Studies. 12-21-70; # 23-154. "CARNI." Noe, Virgillio. Head of the Sacred Congregation of Divine Worship. He and Bugnini paid 5 Protestant Ministers and one Jewish Rabbi to create the Novus Ordo Mass. 4-3-61; # 43652-21. "VINO." Palestra, Vittorie. He is Legal Council of the Sacred Rota of the Vatican State. 5-6-43; # 1965. "PAVI." Pappalardo, Salvatore. Cardinal. Archbishop of Palermo, Sicily. 4-15-68; # 234-07. "SALPA." Pasqualetti, Gottardo. 6-15-60; # 4-231. "COPA." Pasquinelli, Dante. Council of Nunzio of Madrid. 1-12-69; # 32-124. "PADA." Pellegrino, Michele. Cardinal. Called "Protector of the Church", Archbishop of Torino (Turin, where the Holy Shroud of Jesus is kept). 5-2-60; # 352-36. "PALMI." Piana, Giannino. 9-2-70; # 314-52. "GIPI." Pimpo, Mario. Vicar of Office of General Affairs. 3-15-70; # 793-43. "PIMA." Pinto, Monsignor Pio Vito. Attaché of Secretary of State and Notare of Second Section of Supreme Tribunal and of Apostolic Signature. 4-2-70; # 3317-42. "PIPIVI." Poletti, Ugo. Cardinal. Vicar of S.S. Diocese of Rome. Controls clergy of Rome since 3-6-73. Member of Sacred Congregation of Sacraments and of Divine Worship. He is President of Pontifical Works and Preservation of the Faith. Also President of the Liturgical Academy. 2-17-69; # 32-1425. "UPO." Rizzi, Monsignor Mario. Sacred Congregation of Oriental Rites. Listed as "Prelate Bishop of Honour of the Holy Father, the Pope." Works under top-Mason Mario Brini in manipulating Canon Law. 9-16-69; # 43-179. "MARI," "MONMARI." Romita, Florenzo. Was in Sacred Congregation of Clergy. 4-21-56; # 52-142. "FIRO." Rogger, Igine. Officer in S.S. (Diocese of Rome). 4-16-68; # 319-13. "IGRO." Rossano, Pietro. Sacred Congregation of Non-Christian Religions. 2-12-68; # 3421-a. "PIRO." Rovela, Virgillio. 6-12-64; # 32-14. "ROVI." Sabbatani, Aurelio. Archbishop of Giustiniana (Giusgno, Milar Province, Italy). First Secretary Supreme Apostolic Segnatura. 6-22-69; # 87-43. "ASA" Sacchetti, Guilio. Delegate of Governors - Marchese. 8-23-59; # 0991-b. "SAGI." Salerno, Francesco. Bishop. Prefect Atti. Eccles. 5-4-62; # 0437-1. "SAFRA" Santangelo, Franceso. Substitute General of Defense Legal Counsel. 11-12-70; # 32-096. "FRASA." Santini, Pietro. Vice Official of the Vicar. 8-23-64; # 326-11. "SAPI." Savorelli, Fernando. 1-14-69; # 004-51. "SAFE." Savorelli, Renzo. 6-12-65; # 34-692. "RESA." Scanagatta, Gaetano. Sacred Congregation of the Clergy. Member of Commission of Pomei and Loreto, Italy. 9-23-71; # 42-023. "GASCA." Schasching, Giovanni. 3-18-65; # 6374-23. "GISCHA," "GESUITA." Schierano, Mario. Titular Bishop of Acrida (Acri in Cosenza Province, Italy.) Chief Military Chaplain of the Italian Armed Forces. 7-3-59; #14-3641. "MASCHI." Semproni, Domenico. Tribunal of the Vicarate of the Vatican. 4-16-60; # 00-12. "DOSE." Sensi, Giuseppe Mario. Titular Archbishop of Sardi (Asia Minor near Smyrna). Papal Nunzio to Portugal. 11-2-67; # 18911-47. "GIMASE." Sposito, Luigi. Pontifical Commission for the Archives of the Church in Italy. Head Administrator of the Apostolic Seat of the Vatican. Suenens, Leo. Cardinal. Title: Protector of the Church of St. Peter in Chains, outside Rome. Promotes Protestant Pentecostalism (Charismatics). Destroyed much Church dogma when he worked in 3 Sacred Congregations: Propagation of the Faith; Rites and Ceremonies in the Liturgy; Seminaries. 6-15-67; # 21-64. "LESU." Trabalzini, Dino. Bishop of Rieti (Reate, Peruga, Italy). Auxiliary Bishop of Southern Rome. 2-6-65; # 61-956. "TRADI." Travia, Antonio. Titular Archbishop of Termini Imerese. Head of Catholic schools. 9-15-67; # 16-141. "ATRA." Trocchi, Vittorio. Secretary for Catholic Laity in Consistory of the Vatican State Consultations. 7-12-62; # 3-896. "TROVI." Tucci, Roberto. Director General of Vatican Radio. 6-21-57; # 42-58. "TURO." Turoldo, David. 6-9-67; # 191-44. "DATU." Vale, Georgio. Priest. Official of Rome Diocese. 2-21-71; # 21-328. "VAGI." Vergari, Piero. Head Protocol Officer of the Vatican Office Segnatura. 12-14-70; # 3241-6. "PIVE." Villot, Jean. Cardinal. Secretary of State during Pope Paul VI. He is Camerlengo (Treasurer). "JEANNI," "ZURIGO." Zanini, Lino. Titular Archbishop of Adrianopoli, which is Andrianopolis, Turkey. Apostolic Nuncio. Member of the Revered Fabric of St. Peter's Basilica. THE FOLLOWING CLERGY WERE EXPOSED AFTER THE ABOVE LIST WAS COMPILED: Cresti, Osvaldo. 5-22-63; # 1653-6. "CRESO" Crosta, Sante. 11-17-63; # 1254-65. "CROSTAS" Drusilla, Italia. 10-12-63; # 1653-2. "'DRUSI" Fregi, Francesco Egisto. 2-14-63; # 1435-87 Orbasi, Igino. 9-17-73; # 1326-97. "ORBI" Ratosi, Tito. 11-22-63; # 1542-74 "TRATO" Rotardi, Tito. 8-13-63; # 1865-34. "TROTA" Tirelli, Sotiro. 5-16-63; # 1257-9. "TIRSO" Events Foretold? "I Saw Satans' Smoke Entering the Vatican" Anne Catherine Emmerich (1774-1824), a German Augustinian nun, stigmatist (bore the wounds of Christ), and miracle-worker, who subsisted entirely on water and Holy Communion for many years, received numerous visions of the future crisis in the Church and the infiltration of the Masons. In her visions, she describes men in aprons destroying the Church with a trowel, The Masons wear aprons and their symbol is the Mason's trowel. The following excerpts are from page 565 of Life of Anne Catherine Emmerich, Vol. 1, by Rev. K.E. Schmöger, Tan Books, 1976: "I saw St. Peter's. A great crowd of men was trying to pull it down whilst others constantly built it up again. Lines connected these men one with another and with others throughout the whole world. I was amazed at their perfect understanding. "The demolishers, mostly apostates and members of different sects, broke off whole pieces and worked according to rules and instructions. They wore WHITE APRONS bound with blue riband. In them were pockets and they had TROWELS stuck in their belts. The costumes of the others were various. "There were among the demolishers distinguished men wearing uniforms and crosses. They did not work themselves but they marked out on the wall with a TROWEL where and how it should be torn down. To my horror, I saw among them Catholic Priests. Whenever the workmen did not know how to go on, they went to a certain one in their party. He had a large book which seemed to contain the whole plan of the building and the way to destroy it. They marked out exactly with a TROWEL the parts to be attacked, and they soon came down. They worked quietly and confidently, but slyly, furtively and warily. I saw the Pope praying, surrounded by false friends who often did the very opposite to what he had ordered..." Video The Vaticans Banker Return to Vatican-Pope and The New World Order Return to The Dark History of The Vatican Return to Masons and Knights Templars Return to Temas / Sociopolitica Return to Global Banking

It all infested the New World -

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: THE UNDERGROUND NAZI INVASION OF THE UNITED STATES

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: The Mae Brussel Reference Site

God and His Messiah Jesus Christ our Lord - our right and duty to witness to Him: THE DAY ADMIRAL BOORDA DIED

THE DAY ADMIRAL BOORDA DIED - Roots in ZioNazi Marine Corps Mob Killing Machine responsible for subverting the nation and handing over America to "Israel" on 911 - Part 2