 |
| The Titanic on the bottom of the Ocean. Sunk just like "Roman Catholicism" was sunk on December 8, 1965. |
 |
| The Britanic, the Titanic's sister ship, sunk on the bottom of the Aegean Sea, just like the "Orthodox Church" is sunk. The final sinking was at Vatican II in which the Orthodox were totally complicit through their Freemasonic masters - the same Freemasonic masters that control the Vatican. |
The below in what it relates concerning fifty years ago can be likened to sitting on the deck of the Titanic, and as the ship is sinking, asking oneself if leaving right now would be appropriate. The continuing debate now - figuratively speaking, must be taking place by ghosts on the bottom of the Ocean as the ship sunk those approximately fifty years ago {49 years to be exact, when the arch heretic and crypto Jew Satan worshipping Apostate "Paul VI" on December 8, 1965 proclaimed Vatican II and the heretofore unknown and heretical doctrine of Papal Infallibility based on Ratification (which claims that God will Ratify any decision made by the "Pope" - i.e. cause it to be true, even if it never was before - actually that is ancient pagan Satanic Greco-Egyptian theurgic magic), all total lies}. Our Lord Jesus Christ guaranteed the Catholic faith is to remain impervious to Satan and the gates of hell eternally. But no guarantee is given to specific individuals nor to specific ecclesial bodies nor to offices within those bodies. Roman Catholicism based on and centered on the Vatican, ended as any kind of profession of Christian faith and any kind of profession of Catholic faith on December 8, 1965. It is true that the enthronement of Satan occurred in the Vatican two years earlier, but that was done in secret and kept from the people in the pews. The "replacing" of Jesus Christ as head of His Church was done in public at the Promulgation of Vatican I/II and ever since hammered into every one unfortunate enough to be inside the, from that time on, gates of hell - Fallen Babylon the Great. Vatican II, that utterly absolutely false council continuing the unfinished and not promulgated Vatican I, the so called Second Vatican Council, opened on October 11th, 1962 and closed, see video directly below, on December 8, 1965. That promulgated the doctrine that made the "Pope" the Head of the Church of which ONLY Jesus Christ is actually and truly Head of His body, the faithful. What they actually accomplished was to separate themselves and ANYONE who follows them or has ANY fellowship with them at all from Our Lord Jesus Christ and instead made anyone who follows or has any fellowship with the Vatican slaves of the Devil and ONLY on the road to hell and eternal damnation. The Vatican at that point is Babylon and anyone that does not come out of Babylon completely is damned to hell by God.
See these: The Justice of God: The Justice of God: The Apocalypse, the Book of the Revelation: 18. - The Complete Apostasy and fall into absolute Satanic decadence and Fall of Rome-the Vatican and its total destruction by the command of God Almighty
and
The Justice of God: Spiritual wickednesses in high places - Black Magic "Mary" Gnostic Devil Mother Goddess of all religions falsely Resurrected Assumed
and
The Justice of God: Apostate Antipope and antichrist and damned false prophet Paul VI: enthronement of Satan, papal infallibility,
Here are the examples of "strain out the gnat and swallow the camel" which pretend to have a higher and purer view but still ONLY insist on binding people to Papal Infallibility - which is actually pagan infidel Ratification, NO MATTER WHO WAS CONSIDERED "POPE," and will only drag you into the gates of hell and eternal damnation. Notice the last comment was not published by Mr. Sanborn on "A failed strategy | Bp. Sanborn's Blog" below, but is only awaiting moderation - in fact, Mr. Sanborn does not want to present the truth and which that comment is in fact an absolutely true comment. Even if the Vatican was cleansed of the enthronement of Satan and all of the pedophiles and all of the False doctrine except one - Papal Infallibility, it would still be totally Apostate and would only drag anyone having ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT TO HELL FOREVER. That would be because of that one absolute Evil doctrine of trying to replace with anyone else the Immortal Son of God the Father Who is only Our God and Lord Jesus Christ as Head of His Church.
Novus Ordo Wire | Blog, News Archive at NOVUS ORDO WATCH
Maurice Pinay
On the Contrary
Most Holy Trinity Seminary-Bishop's Blog
A failed strategy | Bp. Sanborn's Blog
A failed strategy
[Previously published post, now available here]
When I made the decision to go to Ecône forty-three years ago, I was told by many friends and advisers that I was going too far, that I was being too radical. Instead, I should stay within the structures that had embraced Vatican II, the New Mass, and Modernism, and work for change from within.
I have heard this same theme repeated to me over and over again during these same forty-three years. In January of this year, a Novus Ordo priest whom I have known since 1969 told me to “come home,” sounding again the familiar theme that the right path is to work from within, to overcome the Modernists within the Novus Ordo structures. This admonition came from the same priest, nevertheless, who says that he agrees with me in nearly everything I say.
Now that fifty years have transpired since Vatican II, can we really say that the movement from within has succeeded? After a half a century of resisting from within, has the tidal wave of Vatican II receded? Has the Catholic faith become stronger in the souls of baptized Catholics? As we look around at the vineyard of the Church, is it flourishing with deep faith and obedience to the commandments of God? Are the sheep of Christ in good hands? Are they confirmed in the doctrines of the Catholic Faith?
Is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the central act of worship of the Catholic Church, in good order? Has progress been made to turn back the tide of the devastating liturgical reform of Vatican II?
The answer is, of course, no. What words can we muster to describe the state of the Catholic Church today: Disaster? Ashes? Hiroshima? Great Apostasy? Is there, indeed, a word that could adequately describe the collapse of an institution which has taken place in the past fifty years?
Recently a Novus Ordo priest by the name of Father Thomas Kocik published a letter entitled Reforming the Irreformable? He is most noted for leading the charge over the past two decades of a movement known as the Reform of the Reform. This movement sought to “fix up” the Paul VI Mass of 1969, so that it would become something acceptable to Catholic tradition, something that could be legitimately called continuity.
In this letter, Fr. Kocik declares that such a project is no longer possible. He states:
[T]he ‘reform of the reform’ is not realizable because the material discontinuity between the two forms of the Roman rite presently in use is much broader and much deeper than I had first imagined. In the decade that has elapsed since the publication of my book, The Reform of the Reform? A Liturgical Debate (Ignatius Press, 2003), which concerns almost exclusively the rite of Mass, a number of important scholarly studies, most notably those of László Dobszay (†2011)6 and Lauren Pristas,7 have opened my eyes to the hack-job inflicted by Pope Paul VI’sConsilium on the whole liturgical edifice of the Latin Church: the Mass; the Divine Office; the rites of the sacraments, sacramentals, blessings and other services of the Roman Ritual; and so forth.8 Whatever else might be said of the reformed liturgy—its pastoral benefits, its legitimacy, its rootedness in theological ressourcement, its hegemonic status, etc.—the fact remains: it does not represent an organic development of the liturgy which Vatican II (and, four centuries earlier, the Council of Trent) inherited. (The full text of the letter can be found on the New Liturgical Movement website)
Such admissions on the part of someone who has tirelessly worked from within are truly startling.
What has “working from within” obtained? Modernism has triumphed, and is in full control in all Catholic institutions. The New Mass is everywhere celebrated. All of the life signs of the Church, and particularly belief in the dogmas of faith, are alarmingly low. The most that can be said for “working from within” is that here and there tiny pockets of liturgical tradition may be found, all operating nonetheless under the aegis of Modernism and in the doctrinal discontinuity of Vatican II. It has obtained for us a liturgical High Church, that is, isolated communities of Modernists clothed in the trapping of tradition. After fifty years!
What has “working from without” obtained? It has (1) assured the continuity of a valid episcopacy and a valid priesthood; (2) preserved the faithful from Modernism; (3) trained priests who are firm against the Modernist heresy; (4) preserved the integral traditional Mass and traditional sacraments; (5) preserved the pre-Vatican II traditions and practices of the Catholic Church in all things; (6) preserved what alonecan claim continuity with the Catholic Church’s tradition.
If our numbers are not strong, it is because for the past half-century the “workers from within” have reviled and scorned us as renegades. If they had joined us, tremendous pressure could have been put upon the Modernists to abandon their program.
Time has told that working from within is a failed strategy.
Nor for a single moment should anyone think that I concede that we have been working outside the Catholic Church. What sets you outside the Church is heresy. It is those who have embraced the Modernist heresy that are working outside the Church. Those who have resisted the heresy are inside. It is adherence to Catholic doctrine which keeps you inside the Church; it is adherence to heresy that sets you outside.
After fifty years of failure, it is high time that those “working from within” should scrap their plans, and look for something more successful.
4 thoughts on “A failed strategy”